Impact of socio-economic determinants on goat farmers' adaptations to climate change: A multivariate probit approach
227 / 187
Keywords:
Adaptation, Climate change, Goat farming, Probit Socio-economicAbstract
This study overviews at how goat farmers in the Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh are adapting to the climate change and effects of these strategies on their socio-economic situation. The research used data from 300 households in the Banda and Mahoba districts. A multivariate probit econometric model was used to understand what factors influence farmers' choices when adapting to climate change. The results showed that factors like landholding size, farming experience, gender of the household head and especially access to credit institutions significantly influence farmers’ adaptation strategies. Additionally, the study highlights the need for improved infrastructure and services particularly in areas like agricultural extension and market access—to support greater adoption of adaptation measures. These findings can help researchers, environmentalists, and policymakers create better strategies to support sustainable goat farming in the area.
Downloads
References
Aemro T K, Mengistu and T Beyene. 2012. Climate change adaptation strategies of smallholder farmers: The case of Babile District, East Hararghe Zone of Oromiya Regional State of Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 3(14): 1–12.
Agarwal A. 2008b. The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. Paper prepared for a workshop on social dimensions of climate change organized by the Social Development Department, The World Bank, Washington, DC, March 5–6: 2008. 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/28274
Agarwal A and N Perrin. 2008a: Climate adaptation, local institutions, and rural livelihoods. IFRI Working Paper, W081-6. International Forestry Resources and Institutions Program, University of Michigan.
Arimi K. 2014. Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies used among fish farmers in Epe Local Government Areas of Lagos state, Nigeria. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 94 (7): 1470–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6452
Belderbos R M, Carree B, Diederen B, Lokshin and R Veugelers. 2004. Heterogeneity in R and D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization 22: 1237–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 /j.ijindorg.2004.08.001 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001
Bradshaw B. H. Dolan and B. Smit. 2004. Farm-level adaptation to climatic variability and change: Crop diversification in the Canadian prairies. Climatic Change 67(1): 119–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-0710-z
Bryan E ,T T Deressa, G A Gbetibouo and C Ringler. 2009. Adaptation to climate change in Ethiopia and South Africa: Options and Constraints. Environmental Science and Policy 12(4): 413–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.002
Deressa T T, R M Hassan, C Ringler, T Alemu and M Yesuf. 2009. Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change 19 (2): 248–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.002
Deressa T T, R M Hassan, C Ringler, T Alemu and M. Yesuf. 2008. Analysing the determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods and perceptions of climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. (IFPRI Discussion Paper 00798).
Dixit A K and M K Singh. 2014. Economic analysis of goat rearing under field conditions of Bundelkhand region, The Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 20(2): 165–8.
Feleke F B, Berhe M, Gebru G and Hoag D. 2016. Determinants of adaptation choices to climate change by sheep and goat farmers in Northern Ethiopia: The case of Southern and Central Tigray, Ethiopia. Springer Plus 5: 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3042-3
Geweke J. 1996. Variable selection and model comparison in regression in Bayesian Statistics, eds. J. M. Benardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, London: Oxford Press, Vol 5, pp. 609–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198523567.003.0039
Golob T F and A C Regan. 2002. Trucking industry adoption of information technology: A multivariate discrete choice model. Transportation Research Part C 10(3): 205–228. Retreived from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222701744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(02)00006-2
Gould B W, W E Saupe and R M Klemme. 1989. Conservation tillage: The role of farm and operator characteristics and the perception of soil erosion. Land Economics 65: 167–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3146791
Hassan R and C Nhemachena. 2008. Determinants of African farmers’ strategies for adapting to climate change: Multinomial choice analysis. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate. net.
Hassan R. 2010. Implications of climate change for agricultural sector performance in Africa: Policy challenges and research agenda. Journal of African Economies 19, S2: 77–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejp026
Hausman J and D Wise. 1978. A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: Discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica 46: 403–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913909
IPCC Report. 2007. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf.
Jain R, P S Chand, S Rao and S Agarwal. 2020. Crop and soil suitability analysis using multi-criteria decision making in drought-prone semi-arid tropics. Indian Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 19(3): 271–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2455-7145.2020.00036.3
Kabubo – Mariara J and K Karanja. 2007. The economic impact of climate change on Kenyan crop agriculture: A Ricardian approach. World Bank Policy Res. Series Work. P. 4334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4334
Kandlinkar, M. and J. Risbey. 2000. Agricultural impacts of climate change: If adaptation is the answer, what is the question? Climatic Change 45: 529–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005546716266
Kumar K N R, M J M Reddy, K V Reddy, V Paramesha, M Balasubramanian, TK Kumar, RM Kumar and DD Reddy. 2023. Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies in South India: Empirical evidence. Front. Sustain. Food Systems 7:1010527. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1010527Sec. Land, Livelihoods and Food Security DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1010527
Lin C T J, K L Jensen and S T Yen. 2005. Awareness of Food-Borne Pathogens among US consumers. Food Quality and Preference 16 (5): 401–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.07.001
Maddison D. 2007. The perception of and adaptation to climate change in Africa. In Policy Research Working Paper 4308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4308
Washington DC: The World Bank.
Molla E Y, Melka and G Desta. 2023. Determinants of farmers’ adaptation strategies to climate change impacts in northwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon 9 (8): e18514: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18514
Nhemachena C R, Hassan and J Chakwizira. 2014. Analysis of determinants of farm-level adaptation measures to climate change in Southern Africa. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics 6(5): 232–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE12.0441
Nzeadibe T C, C L Egbule, N Chukwuone and V Agu. 2011. Farmers’ perceptions of climate change Governance and adaptation constraints in Niger delta region of Nigeria. African Technology Policy Network, Research Paper No. 7.
Ojo T and L Baiyegunhi. 2018. Determinants of Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change among Rice Farmers in Southwestern Nigeria: A Multivariate Probit Approach, 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277011, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
Reid S B, Smit W, Caldwell and S. Belliveau. 2007. Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Risks in Ontario Agriculture. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12: 609–637. Online https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9051-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9051-8
Reidsma P F, Ewert A O, Lansink and R Leemans. 2009. Vulnerability and adaptation of European farmers: A multi-level analysis of yield and income responses to climate variability. Regional Environmental Change 9(1): 25–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0059-3
Sofoluwe N A, A A Tijani and O I Baruwa. 2011. Farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate change in Osun State, Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(20): 4789–4794. Retrieved online at http://www.academicjournals. org/AJAR.
Stern N. 2007. The economics of climate change: the Stern review, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
Tirivangasi H M. 2019. Challenges faced by rural people in mitigating the effects of climate change in the Mazungunye communal lands, Zimbabwe. Jamba, Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 11(1): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v11i1.596
Vogel C. and K O’Brien. 2006. Who can eat information? Examining the effectiveness of seasonal climate forecasts and regional climate-risk management strategies. Climate Research 33: 111–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/cr033111
Weber C, Dixit A K, Singh M K, Kumar V, Jha A K, Teufel N and Baltenweck, I. 2018. Development of goat milk and meat value chains in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. ILRI Project Report. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.
Ziervogel G, M Bithell, R Washington and T Downing: Agent-based social simulation: A method for assessing the impact of seasonal climate forecasts among smallholder farmers. Agricultural Systems 83(1): 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2004.02.009
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.