Evaluation of genetic diversity of Indigenous poultry (Khukhri) found in Chotanagpur Plateau of Jharkhand
80 / 52
Keywords:
Khukhri, Indigenous chicken, Genetic diversity, Phenotypic traits, RAPDAbstract
Indigenous poultry farming plays an important role in livelihood and nutritional security of rural and tribal populations of Jharkhand. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the phenotypic performance and genetic diversity of Khukhri chicken of the Chotanagpur plateau. A field survey was conducted on 270 households covering 540 birds. Phenotypic characterization revealed predominance of mixed plumage with yellow shank colour (85.56%) and uniform red earlobe, comb and white skin. However, variability in comb type was observed with single comb (≈52%) being predominant. Adult body weight of males and females averaged 1552.18 ± 27.46 g and 1182.04 ± 14.30 g, while shank length was 9.85 ± 0.08 cm and 8.73 ± 0.05 cm, respectively. Genetic diversity was assessed using RAPD markers on 50 birds. Out of 22 primers, 16 produced polymorphic bands generating 172 bands, of which 168
(97.67%) were polymorphic. Nei’s gene diversity ranged from 0.28 ± 0.01 to 0.29 ± 0.01, and Shannon’s information index ranged from 0.43 ± 0.01 to 0.44 ± 0.01 across populations. The study indicated moderate genetic variability within Khukhri chicken populations. However, the observed variability in comb type suggested that further studies focusing on uniform sub-populations (particularly single-comb birds) are necessary for breed standardization and conservation planning.
Downloads
References
Ahmad LS and Al-Barzinji YMS. 2019. Genetic diversity among local quail using RAPD-DNA marker. Revista Cientifica de Veterinaria 29(3): 178–185.
Banerjee S. 2012. Morphological characterization of indigenous chickens of Sikkim and West Bengal, India. Animal Genetic Resources 51: 57–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633612000343
Goli RC, Sukhija N, Rathi P, Chishi KG, Koloi S, Malik AA, Sree CC, Purohit PB, Shetkar M and Kanaka KK. 2024. Unraveling the genetic tapestry of Indian chicken: A comprehensive study of molecular variations and diversity. Ecological Genetics and Genomics 30: 100220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egg.2024.100220
Gorkhali NA, Dhakal R, Sapkota S, Koirala P, Pokhrel P, Pokhrel BR, Kolachhapati MR and Bhattarai N. 2020. Polymorphism of Sakini chicken population from different locations/altitudes of Nepal using RAPD markers. SAARC Journal of Agriculture 18(2): 115–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v18i2.51113
Karabag K and Balcioglu MS. 2010. Genetic diversity among selected Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) lines using RAPD markers. Journal of Applied Animal Research 38: 149–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2010.9707176
Kim SH. 2021. Identification of genetic association among different colors of Korean native chicken breeds through RAPD-PCR method. Journal of Animal Health and Production 9(1): 33–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2021/9.1.33.39
Kimura M and Crow JF. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49: 725–738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/49.4.725
Lewontin RC. 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Evolutionary Biology 6: 381–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9063-3_14
Liswaniso S, Mwambilwa K, Odubote K, Tyasi TL, Mweni M, Sun X, Xu R and Qin N. 2024. Zambian indigenous chicken genetic resources: Phenotypic characteristics and their production systems among small-scale farmers. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 11: 1429869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1429869
Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/282771
Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 70: 3321–3323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321
Olowofeso O, Wang JY, Zhang P and Dai GJ. 2006. Genetic analysis of Haimen chicken populations using decamer random markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 19(11): 1519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1519
Prabhakaran R and Valavan ES. 2020. Breeding strategies for native chicken production in India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 8(3): 193–199.
Rachman MP, Bamidele O, Dessie T, Smith J, Hanotte O and Gheyas AA. 2024. Genomic analysis of Nigerian indigenous chickens reveals their genetic diversity and adaptation to heat stress. Scientific Reports 14: 2209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52569-4
Radwan LM, Mahrous MY and El-Denary ME. 2015. Assessing the genetic variability in egg production and egg quality traits of four Egyptian local strains of chickens using RAPD and SSR techniques. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production 52(1): 55–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejap.2015.93639
Sovi S, Adomako K, Kyei B, Kena AW, Olympio OS and Aggrey SE. 2024. Comparative study of population structure and genetic diversity of commercial and indigenous chickens from different agro-ecological zones in Ghana using SilicoDArT and SNP markers. Gene 929: 148823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2024.148823
Tantia MS, Ganai N, Vij PK, Vijh RK and Ahlawat SPS. 2005. Chicken breeds of India—Kashmir Faverolla. Leaflet No. 1. National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, India.
Wen Z, Cai X, Liu Z, Tan L, Kong Y, Wang Y and Zhao Y. 2025. Genomic analyses reveal a lack of widespread strong selection in indigenous chickens. Poultry Science 104(5): 105081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105081
Wu S, Chen Z, Zhou X, Lu J, Tian Y, Jiang Y, Liu Q, Wang Z, Li H, Qu L and Zhang F. 2024. Analysis of genetic diversity and genetic structure of indigenous chicken populations in Guizhou province based on genome-wide SNP markers. Poultry Science 103(12): 104383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104383
Wu S, Dou T, Wang K, Yuan S, Yan S, Xu Z, Liu Y, Jian Z, Zhao J, Zhao R, Wu H, Gu D, Liu L, Li Q, Wu DD, Ge C, Su Z and Jia J. 2024. Artificial selection footprints in indigenous and commercial chicken genomes. BMC Genomics 25: 428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10291-5
Yeh FC, Boyle T, Rongcai Y, Ye Z and Xian JM. 1999. POPGENE Version 3.1. Available at: http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/ (cited from American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 1(2): 17–22.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.