Comparative evaluation of performance and genetic diversity of Indigenous poultry (Khukhri) found in Chotanagpur Plateau of Jharkhand


3

Authors

  • Dr Ravindra Kumar Scientist, LPM

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i1.174030

Keywords:

Khukhri, Poultry, Backyard, phenotypic, genetic characterization

Abstract

 In Jharkhand, indigenous poultry farming, also known as backyard poultry, is a widespread and culturally significant practice, particularly among the rural and tribal populations.  The present study was conducted to survey, evaluate the performance under village and farm management conditions and molecular characterization of Khukhri chickens of Chotanagpur plateau of Jharkhand. The survey was conducted on 270 households and 540 native chickens. The phenotypic characters of native chickens studied showed the mix type predominant plumage colour. The overall shank colour was predominantly yellow (85.56 %) followed by slaty-black. All the chickens (100 %) had red earlobe, white skin and red comb. Adult body weight were observed to be 1552.18 ± 27.46 and 1182.04 ± 14.30 kg, however shank length (cm) were observed to be 9.85 ± 0.08 and 8.73 ± 0.05 for cock and hen, respectively. Twenty blood samples were collected in group 1 and 30 from Ranchi district in group 2. Twenty primers were screened, out of which 16 generated polymorphic amplification patterns. RAPD-PCR analysis generated a total of 172 bands, 168 of them were polymorphic. It was observed that primer OPA-16 amplified maximum number (16) of polymorphic bands and PBG-5 amplified lowest number (5) of polymorphic bands. Among the 16 primers used, three-fourth (75%) were highly polymorphic. The average number of amplified bands per primer ranged from 2.2 to 7.46 and the size of the amplified bands varied between 100 to 3000 base pairs. The mean value of Nei’s gene diversity and Shannon’s information index was 0.28 ± 0.01 and 0.43 ± 0.01 in group 1 and 0.29 ± 0.01 and 0.44 ± 0.01 165 in group 2 respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Dr Ravindra Kumar, Scientist, LPM

    Department of Livestock production Management, Sr Assistant professor, College of Veterinary Science, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand

References

Abdulrazaq H S and Ali Suliaman N M. 2016. Polymorphism between five local chickens in Erbil using RAPD, ZANCO. J. Pure Appl. Sci. 58(1): 65-69.

Ahmad L S and AL-Barzinji Y M S. 2019. Genetic diversity among local quail using RAPD-DNA marker. Revista Cientifica de Veterinaria, xxlx. (3):178-185.

Baloza S H, Hemeda S A, Sosa G A and Shady A A. 2013. Assessment of genetic variability among Fayoumi, Rhod Island Red and their crosses using RAPD-PCR. Benha Vet. Med. J. 25(2): 232-239.

Banerjee S. 2012. Morphological characterization of indigenous chickens of Sikkim and West Bengal, India. Anim. Genet Resour. 51: 57-71.

Dehghanzadeh H, Mirhoseini S Z, Ramanov M N and Ghorbani A. 2009. Evaluation of genetic variability and distances among five Iranian native chicken populations using RAPD markers. Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 12 (11): 866-871.

Fadhil I A, Dakheel M H and Hussein T H. 2016. Detection of genetic diversity through two poultry breeds by using RAPD-PCR Technique. J. Babylon Univ./Pure and Appl. Sci. 9(24): 2661-2668.

Gorkhail N A, Dhakal R, Sapkota S, Koirala P, Pokhrel P, Pokhrel B R, Kolachhapati M R and Bhattarai N. 2020. Polymorphism of Sakini chicken population from different locations / altitudes of Nepal using Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. SAARC J. Agric., 18 (2): 115-124.

Ibrahim A M, Sabry A M, Hassan M M, El-Hallous E I and Mohamed A A. 2015. Genetic characterization of local chicken from Taif region in Saudi Arabia using RAPD markers. Int. J. Biosci. 6(10): 142-148.

Kim S-H. 2021. Identification of genetic association among different colors of Korean native chicken breeds through the RAPD-PCR method. J. Anim. Health Prod. 9(1) : 33-39.

Karabag K and Balcioglu M S. 2010. Genetic diversity among selected Japanese quail (Coturnix Coturnix japonica) lines using RAPD markers. J. App. Anim. Res. 38: 149-152.

Kimura M and Crow J F. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genet. 49: 725-738.

Lewontin R C. 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Evol. Biol. 6: 381-398

Nei M.1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat., 106: 283–292.

Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 70: 3321-3323.

Olowofeso O, Wang J Y, Zhang P and Dai G J. 2006. Genetic Analysis of Haimen Chicken Populations Using Decamer Random Markers. Asian Austr. J. Anim. Sci. 19(11) DOI:10.5713/ajas.2006.1519.

Prabhakaran R and Valavan E S. 2020. Breeding strategies for native chicken production in India. J. Entom. Zoo. Stud. 8(3): 193-199.

Radwan L M, Mahrous M Y and EL-Denary M E. 2015. Assessing the genetic variability in egg production and egg quality traits of four Egyptian local strains of chickens using RAPD and SSR techniques. Egyptian J. Anim. Prod. 52(1): 55-61.

Sambrook J, Fritsch E F and Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd ed. Cold spring Harbour, Cold Laboratory press; NY.

Shivaprasad Ch, Gupta B R and Chatterjee R N. 2016. Genetic characterization of dahlem red layers by PCR-RAPD. Indian J. Anim. Res. 50(6): 877-880.

Tantia M S, Ganai N, Vij P K, Vijh R K and Ahlawat S P S. 2005. Chicken breeds of India-Kashmir Faverolla. Leaflet 1. National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, P. O. Box 129, Karnal, 132001.

Yeh F, Boyle C T, Ronagcai Y, Ye Z and Xian J M. 1999. POPGENE Version 3.1 (http:/ www.ualberta.Ca/-Fyeh/Fyah.). Cited from American J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 1(2): 17-22, 2006.

Submitted

2025-12-10

Published

2026-06-16

How to Cite

Dr Ravindra Kumar. (2026). Comparative evaluation of performance and genetic diversity of Indigenous poultry (Khukhri) found in Chotanagpur Plateau of Jharkhand. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 96(1). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i1.174030
Citation