Udder morphology and linear udder scoring as indicators for functional adaptation and selection in Yemeni indigenous sheep breeds


7

Authors

  • Abed Al-Bial Agricultural Research and Extension Authority(AREA)

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i6.174631

Keywords:

Yemeni sheep, Udder characteristics, Linear scoring,

Abstract

Yemeni indigenous sheep are well adapted to various and poor agro-ecological conditions, but there is little information on their characteristic's morphology. The present study evaluated the measurements of the udder and teats, linear udder scores, and their relationships in Yemeni indigenous sheep breeds. One hundred and fifty ewes in their lactating stage belong six indigenous breeds were assessed in semi-extensive conditions. Eight udders' measurements and four linear udder traits (1 9 scale) were recorded. The mean length of the udder, depth, and circumference were 13.49, 12.70, and 24.61 cm, respectively, which showed a significant phenotypic variability. Most of the measures of the udder (P < 0.01) and scores of the linear udder were significantly affected by breed, and only dam age (udder circumference and width) was affected. Udder circumference and udder width had a high positive correlation (r = 0.82, P < 0.01), but distance between teats had negative correlation with distance to the ground (r = -0.49, P < 0.01). Strong correlations were between udder measures and linear scores that proved the reliability of both evaluation methods. In general, the Yemeni indigenous sheep have good and varied udder characteristics that can be put into good use in within-breed selection programs to enhance udder functionality, productivity, and adaptation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altincekic S O, Koyuncu M. 2011. Relationship between udder measurements and milk yield in different sheep breeds. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10(9), 1163–1169.

Birteeb P T, Peters S O, Yakubu A, Adeleke M A, Ozoje M O. 2012. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous sheep breeds in Ghana using multivariate analysis. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 1711–1719.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0148-7.

Casu S, Carta A, Ruda G, 2006. Genetic improvement of udder morphology in dairy sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 62, 221–227.

Dogan S, Altincekic S O, Koyuncu M. 2013. Relationships between udder traits and milk yield in different sheep breeds. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 12, 226–231.

Dzidic A, Prpic Z, Mioc B. 2004. Udder morphology and milkability of Istrian sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 52, 183–189.

Fernandez G, Baro J A, De la Fuente L F. 1997. Relationship between udder measurements and milk yield in dairy sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 24, 153–159.

Gelasakis A I, Valergakis G E, Arsenos G, Banos G. 2012. Description and typology of intensive Chios dairy sheep farms in Greece. Journal of Dairy Science, 95(6), 3070–3079. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4955.

Ivanova T, Raicheva E. 2019. Application of linear scoring method of the udder in sheep. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 25: 87-90.

Karakus F. 2024. Determination of linear udder traits of Norduz sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 58(1): 161–166. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJAR.BF-1558.

Kominakis A P, Papavasiliou D, Rogdakis E. 2009. Relationships among udder characteristics, milk yield and, non yield traits in Frizarta dairy sheep. Small Ruminant Research 84:82-88.

Labussiere J, Dotchewski D, Combaud J F. 1981. Morphological characteristics of the udder of dairy ewes and their relationship with milk yield. Annales de Zootechnie, 30, 115–136.

Makovicky P, Margetín M, Apolen D. 2013. Relationships between udder morphology and milk yield in dairy sheep breeds. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 102, 25–34.

Margetin M, Milerski M, Apolen D, Capistrak A. 2013. Relationships between external udder measurements and milk yield in dairy sheep during lactation. Small Ruminant Research, 110(2–3), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.10.006.

Marie-Etancelin C, Astruc J M, Lagriffoul G. 2006. Genetic analysis of udder morphology traits in dairy sheep. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 3541–3552. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72381-5.

Mavrogenis A P, Papachristoforou C, Lysandrides P. 1988. Environmental and genetic factors affecting udder characteristics and milk yield in Chios sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 1, 245–252.

Milerski M, Margetin M, Apolen D, Capistrak A. 2006. Relationships between external udder measurements and milk yield in dairy sheep.Small Ruminant Research, 64 (3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.05.011.

Murphy T W, Taylor J B. 2021. The relationship between milk score near parturition and udder score near weaning and their effects on Polypay, Rambouillet and Targhee ewe productivity. Translational Animal Science. 5: 134 138. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txab176.

Ozyurek S, Turkyilmaz D, Yaprak M, Esenbuga N. 2018. Determination of morphological and linear udder traits in Morkaraman, Tuj and Awassi sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 52(3): 424–430. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.7256.

Prpic Z, Vnucec I, Benic M, Konjacic M, Kelava Ugarkovic N, Mioc B. 2020. Udder shape and milk yield of different sheep breeds. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 21(2): 197-206.

SAS, Institute., 2002. Version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Shettima S M, Aliyu J, Abbator F I, Lamido M, Abdulhamid A D. 2022.

Phenotypic correlations of body weight, milk yield with udder and teat measurements in three Nigerian breeds of sheep. Nigerian Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 5(1): 103–110.

Vnucec I, Benic M, Konjacic M, Kelava Ugarkovic N, Mioc B. 2020. Udder shape and milk yield of different sheep breeds. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 21(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/21.2.2455

Submitted

2025-12-29

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Al-Bial, A. (2026). Udder morphology and linear udder scoring as indicators for functional adaptation and selection in Yemeni indigenous sheep breeds. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 96(6). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i6.174631
Citation