Impact of Different Cost-Effective Maintenance Rations on Economics, Nutrient Intake and Physiological Responses of Unproductive Tharparkar Cattle
1
Keywords:
Cost-effective ration, Tharparkar, TMR, Economic viability, Unproductive cattle, Urea-treated strawAbstract
An experiment was conducted for 60 days on 24 non-pregnant, non-lactating, unproductive Tharparkar cows to evaluate the impact of different cost-effective maintenance rations on economics, nutrient intake, and physiological responses. The animals were randomly divided into four groups: a control group (T0) receiving farm-level diet consisting of conventional green fodder and concentrate-based ration, and three treatment groups evaluating cost-effective concentrate mixture (T1), Total Mixed Ration (T2), and urea-treated wheat straw supplemented with minimal concentrate (T3). It was observed that total dry matter intake and body weight remained stable across all groups (P > 0.05), indicating that the cost-effective rations provided sufficient nutrients for maintenance without compromising the physical condition of the animals. The physiological profile, including hematological indices and serum biochemical constituents (total protein, glucose, and creatinine), remained within the normal range for all treatments, confirming metabolic safety. While serum urea levels were significantly higher in the urea-treated straw group (T3: 19.08 ±0.36mg/dl) compared to control (T0: 12.54±0.32 mg/dl) at day 60 (P<0.001), they remained well within safe physiological thresholds. Stress biomarkers, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and serum cortisol, showed no significant change. The daily feeding cost was significantly reduced by up to 37.3% in the T3 group (₹81.6 vs. ₹130.18/day) compared to the control. These results demonstrate that strategic use of urea-ammoniated straw and cost-effective concentrates offer a scalable, economically viable approach for the sustainable management of unproductive cattle under resource-constrained conditions.
Downloads
References
20th Livestock Census. (2019). Livestock Census-2019. Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, New Delhi.
Aanvi, Sharma, R. K., Khan, N., Rastogi, A., Pathak, A. K., & Sharma, V. K. (2025). Evaluation of dietary incorporation of treated waste silkworm pupae meal on nutrient utilization and performance of broiler chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 95(7): 627–633.
AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis (18th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
BAHS. (2025). Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics-2025. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, New Delhi.
Banday, M. T., Bhat, G. A., Shenaz, S., & Bhakat, M. (2009). Influence of feeding processed silkworm pupae meal on the performance of broiler chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 26(3): 292–295.
Beauchemin, K.A., Eriksen, L., Nørgaard, P. and Rode, L.M. 2008. Salivary secretion during meals in lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91(5): 2077-2081.
Bertoni, G., Trevisi, E.R.M.I.N.I.O., Han, X. and Bionaz, M. 2008. Effects of inflammatory conditions on liver activity in puerperium period and consequences for performance in dairy cows. Journal of dairy science 91(9): 3300-3310.
Bijla, S. and Singh, A. 2019. Economic study of Gaushalas in Haryana: functioning and profitability. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 72(1).
Bionaz, M.E.A., Trevisi, E.R.M.I.N.I.O., Calamari, L.U.I.G.I., Librandi, F., Ferrari, A. and Bertoni, G. 2007. Plasma paraoxonase, health, inflammatory conditions, and liver function in transition dairy cows. Journal of dairy science 90(4):1740-1750.
Ceciliani, F., Ceron, J.J., Eckersall, P.D. and Sauerwein, H. 2012. Acute phase proteins in ruminants. Journal of proteomics 75(14): 4207-4231.
Celi, P., & Gabai, G. (2015). Oxidant/antioxidant balance in animal health and disease. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 1(1): 1–2.
Chilliard, Y., Ferlay, A., Rouel, J. and Lamberet, G. 2003. A review of nutritional and physiological factors affecting goat milk lipid synthesis and lipolysis. Journal of dairy science 86(5): 1751-1770.
Devendra, C., & Leng, R. A. (2011). Feed resources for animals in Asia: Issues, strategies for use, intensification and integration for increased productivity. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 24(3): 303–321.
Dutta, N., Sharma, K., & Naulia, U. (2004). Changes in the rumen fermentation pattern of crossbred calves fed low-quality forage and supplemented with area-specific mineral mixture. Journal of Animal Science 82(10): 2964–2971.
Eckersall, P. D. (2008). Proteins, proteomics, and the dysproteinemias. In Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals., 6th ed.117–155
FAOSTAT. (2023). World food and agriculture – Statistical yearbook 2023. Rome, Italy.
Gomaa, M., Kholif, S. M., Kholif, A. E., Salama, R., & Olafadehan, O. A. 2012. Influence of feeding urea treated rice straw on the performance of growing lambs. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 12(2): 217–228.
Hastings, W. H. (1944). The use of urea in commercial dairy feeds. Journal of Dairy Science, 27(12): 1015–1021.
Herdt, T. H. 2000. Ruminant adaptation to negative energy balance. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 16(2): 215–230.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research. (2013). Nutrient requirements of cattle and buffalo (ICAR-NIANP Publication). https://icar.org.in/
ICAR. 2016. Manual on Management of Gaushalas. Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Dairy Research Institute, New Delhi.
Kaneko, J. J., Harvey, J. W., & Bruss, M. L. (2008). Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals (6th ed.). Academic Press.
Kilwany, M. A. 2023. Animal Culling and the One Health Approach-Some Ethical Considerations [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi].
Mordak, R., Kupczyński, R., Kuczaj, M. and Niżański, W. 2020. Analysis of correlations between selected blood markers of liver function and milk composition in cows during late lactation period. Annals of Animal Science 20(3): 871-886.
Murthy, A. S., Raman, K. J., & Singh, K. 1999. Economic evaluation of different feeding systems for sustainable livestock production. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 69(4):256–260.
Radostits, O. M., Gay, C. C., Hinchcliff, K. W., & Constable, P. D. (2007). Veterinary medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle (10th ed.). Saunders Elsevier.
Saeed, M., Khan, M.S., Alagawany, M., Farag, M.R., Alqaisi, O., Aqib, A.I., Qumar, M., Siddique, F. and Ramadan, M.F. 2021. Clove (Syzygium aromaticum) and its phytochemicals in ruminant feed: an updated review. Rendiconti lincei. Scienze fisiche e naturali 32(2): 273-285.
Singh, A., Chandel, B.S., Chauhan, A.K., Kamboj, M.L. and Bijla, S. 2021. Sustainability of gaushalas: do size and patronage matter?. Agricultural Economics Research Review 34(1).
Sivaram, M., Rohith, S., Pradeep, R. and Subash, S. 2021. Economic Sustainability Analysis of Gaushalas in select Districts of Telangana State. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 74(6).
The Cow Protection Bill, 2019 (Bill No. 61 of 2019). Lok Sabha, India. https://sansad.in/
Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365(1554): 2853–2867.
Tothova, C., Nagy, O. and Kovac, G. 2016. Serum proteins and their diagnostic utility in veterinary medicine: a review. Veterinární medicína 61(9): 475-496.
Wanapat, M., Pilajun, R. and Kongmun, P. 2009. Ruminal ecology of swamp buffalo as influenced by dietary sources. Animal Feed Science and Technology 151(3-4): 205-214.
Wanapat, M., & Pimpa, O. (1999). Effect of ruminal NH₃-N levels on rumen ecology, feed digestibility and intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 12(6): 904–907.
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.