Insights into nutrient digestibility, growth and rumen attributes in buffalo, crossbred and indigenous cattle fed a common diet
28
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i8.177751Keywords:
Buffalo, Crossbred, Methane, Nutrient digestibility, Real-time PCR, Rumen fermentationAbstract
The current study was undertaken to evaluate nutrient digestibility, growth, rumen fermentation, and microbial populations in buffaloes and crossbred and indigenous cattle on a similar plane of nutrition. Six animals in each group were taken and were fed roughage and concentrate in equal proportion (50:50) to meet the nutritional requirements. The daily DMI (kg/d), intakes of CP, NDF and ADF was significantly higher (P>0.05) for the buffaloes and crossbred cattle compared to indigenous cattle, while the digestibility of DM and other nutrients did not differ among the groups except for OM and ADF. Buffalo and crossbred cattle had higher net BW gain and ADG. However, FCR was similar among all groups. With respect to rumen fermentation, buffaloes and crossbreds presented with higher VFAs and NH3-N concentration. There was no difference in population density of major rumen microbes except for methanogens and total bacteria, which were significantly higher in crossbred cattle as analysed by real-time PCR. Overall, the study has shown that the nutrient utilization and rumen microbial density did not vary much; differences were found in growth performance and rumen fermentation among the three large bovines.
Downloads
References
Abdullah N, Nolan J V, Mahyuddin M and Jalaludin S. 1992. Digestion and nitrogen conservation in cattle and buffaloes given rice with or without molasses. Journal of Agricultural Science 119: 255 263.
AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Virginia, USA.
Asai K, Lwin K O, Tandang A G, Lapitan R M, Herrera J R V, Del-Barrio A N, Kondo M, Ban-Tokuda T, Abrar A, Fujihara T and Matsui H. 2021. Comparative analysis of rumen Bacteria between water Buffalo and cattle fed the same diet during their fattening period in the Philippines. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ 55(1): 69-75.
Barker S B and Summerson W H. 1941. The colorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. Journal of Biological Chemistry 138: 535-554.
Chanthakhoun V, Wanapat M, Kongmun P and Cherdthong A. 2012. Comparison of ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial population in swamp buffalo and cattle. Livestock Science 143: 172-176.
Cottyn B G and Boucque C V. 1968. Rapid method for the gas-chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16: 105- 107.
Das P, Devalia R, Shekh M A, Lunagariya P M, Wadhwani K N and Sarvaiya N P. 2022. Comparison of nutrient intake and digestibility, rumen fermentation, along with body weight gain in cattle and buffalo fed maintenance diet. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 92(11): 1332-1336.
Denman, S. E. and McSweeney, C. S. 2006. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 58, 572–582.
Denman, S. E., Tomkins, N. W. and McSweeney, C. S. 2007. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 313–322.
Dixit S, Kumar S, Sharma R, Banakar P S, Deb R and Tyagi A K. 2023. Rumen microbial diversity, enteric methane emission and nutrient utilization of crossbred Karan-Fries cattle (Bos taurus) and Murrah buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) consuming varied roughage concentrate ratio. Animal Biotechnology, 34(6): 1857-1875.
Franzolin M H T, Silveira A C and Franzolin R. 2002. The effects of diet with different levels of detergent fiber neutral and pore size nylon bags incubated in the rumen on ruminal fauna in buffalo and cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 31: 716-723.
ICAR. 2013. Nutrient Requirements of Cattle and Buffalo. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Ichinohe T, Orden E A, Del Barrio A N, Lapitan R M, Fujihara T, Cruz L C and Kanai Y. 2004. Comparison of voluntary feed intake, rumen passage and degradation kinetics between crossbred Brahmam cattle (Bos indicus) and swamp buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) fed a fattening diet based on corn silage. Animal Science Journal 75(6): 533-540.
Iqbal M W, Zhang Q, Yang Y, Li L, Zou C, Huang C and Lin B. 2018. Comparative study of rumen fermentation and microbial community differences between water buffalo and Jersey cows under similar feeding conditions. Journal of Applied Animal Research 46: 740-748.
Kala A, Agarwal P, Chaturvedi V B, Vijayalakshmy K, Rahman H, Agarwal N and Chaudhary L C. 2023. Comparative nutrient utilization, enteric methane emission and rumen fermentation in murrah buffaloes, Tharparkar and Vrindavani cattle maintained on similar plane of nutrition. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 23(3): 491-498.
Lapitan R M, Del Barrio A N, Katsube O, Ban‐Tokuda T, Orden E A, Robles A Y, Cruz L C, Kanai Y and Fujihara T. 2008. Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on high roughage diet. Animal Science Journal 79(2): 210-217.
Malik P K, Trivedi S, Kolte A P, Mohapatra A, Biswas S, Bhattar A V, Bhatta R and Rahman H. 2023. Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet. Frontiers in Microbiology 14: 1266025.
Malik P K, Trivedi S, Kolte A P, Mohapatra A, Biswas S, Bhattar A V, Bhatta R and Rahman H. 2023. Comparative Rumen Metagenome and CAZyme Profiles in Cattle and Buffaloes: Implications for Methane Yield and Rumen Fermentation on a Common Diet. Microorganisms 12(1): 47.
Nha P T. 2008. A study of nutrition, performance and economic efficiency of swamp buffaloes in the Mekong Delta College of Agriculture, Cantho University, Vietnam.
Parmar N R, Pandit P D, Purohit H J, Kumar J N and Joshi C G. 2017. Influence of diet composition on cattle rumen methanogenesis: a comparative metagenomic analysis in Indian and exotic cattle. Indian Journal of Microbiology 57: 226-234.
Pradhan K, Bhatia S K and Sangwan D C. 1997. Feed consumption pattern, ruminal degradation, nutrient digestibility and physiological reactions in buffalo and cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 67: 149-151.
Puppo S, Bartocci S S, Terramoccia F, Grandoni and Amici A. 2002. Rumen microbial counts and in vivo digestibility in buffaloes and cattle given different diets. Animal Science 75: 323- 329.
Rathode N, Verma A K, Kala A, Agarwal P, Rahman H and Chaudhary L C. 2022. Comparative evaluation of rumen responses, blood and serum indices in Murrah buffaloes, Vrindavani and Tharparkar Cattle fed on a similar diet. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 39(4): 374-386.
Rathode N, Verma A K, Kala A, Chaturvedi V B, Rahman H and Chaudhary L C. 2024. Comparative evaluation of nutrient utilization, growth performance and methane emission in Murrah buffaloes, Vrindavani and Tharparkar cattle fed on a similar diet. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 94(9): 810-814.
Singh A, Chaturvedi V, Singh P and Kerketta S. 2018. Assessment of Nutrient Utilization capacity of Cross Bred Cattle and Buffaloes fed diets containing Different ratios of Concentrate and Roughage. International Journal of Livestock Research 8: 253-265.
Singh K M, Tripathi A K, Pandya P R, Parnerkar S, Kothari R K and Joshi C G. 2013. Use of RealTime PCR Technique in Determination of Major Fibrolytic and non Fibrolytic Bacteria Present in Indian Surti Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Polish Journal of Microbiology 62: 195–200.
Sinha S K, Chaturvedi V B, Singh P, Chaudhary L C, Ghosh M and Shivani S. 2017. Effect of high and low roughage total mixed ration diets on rumen metabolites and enzymatic profiles in Vrindavani cattle and buffaloes. Veterinary World 10: 616-622.
Sivkova K, Trufchev H and Varliakov I. 1997. Comparative studies on fermentation processes in the rumen and blood content of calves and buffalo calves. In: Proc. I. Effect on diet, containing alfa alfa haylage. World Buffalo Congress, Caserta, Italy. 312–316.
SPSS, 2010. Statistical Packages for Social Sciences, Version 20, SPSS Inc., Illinois, USA.
Sylvester J T, Karnati S K R, Yu Z, Morrison M and Firkins J L. 2004. Development of an Assay to Quantify Rumen Ciliate Protozoal Biomass in Cows Using Real-Time PCR. Journal of Nutrition 134: 3378-3384.
Sylvester, J. T., Karnati, S. K., Yu, Z., Morrison, M., & Firkins, J. L. 2004. Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. J. Nutr. 134, 3378–3384.
Tajima K, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M and Aminov R I. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA libraries from the rumen suggests the existence of a novel group of archaea not associated with known methanogens. Federation of European Microbiological Societies Microbiology Letter 200:67–72.
Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597.
Wanapat M, Gunun P, Anantasook N and Kang S. 2014. Changes of rumen pH, fermentation and microbial population as influenced by different ratios of roughage (rice straw) to concentrate in dairy steers. Journal of Agricultural Science 152: 675.
Wang Q, Gao X, Yang Y, Zou C, Yang Y and Lin B. 2020. A comparative study on rumen ecology of water buffalo and cattle calves under similar feeding regime. Veterinary Medicine and Science 6: 746-754.
Weatherburn, M.W. 1967. Phenol hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39: 971-974
Yu Z and Morrison M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36: 808-812.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.