Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Gut Morphometry of Pigs Fed Single Cell Protein Incorporated Diets


44

Authors

  • Suresh Bypanahalli Veterinary College, Hebbal, Bangalore

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i10.179413

Keywords:

Growth performance, Gut health, Nutrient digestibility, Pigs, Single cell protein

Abstract

The effect of single cell protein (SCP), produced from Methylococcus species, as a soybean meal (SBM) substitute on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and gut morphometry of pigs was assessed. Eighteen weaned piglets were randomly distributed into three groups of six animals each. Control diet was prepared using corn and SBM, and two test diets were prepared by incorporating SCP at 5 or 10% replacing SBM. All the diets were made iso-nitrogenous and iso-caloric for starter (7-11 kg), grower 1 (11-25 kg), grower 2 (25-50 kg) and finisher phase (50-75 kg body weight). Each animal was offered with respective diet daily at 4% of body weight for 28 weeks. The body weight, body weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio of pigs fed 5 and 10% SCP diets were comparable with control group during all phases and cumulatively. The dry matter digestibility was highest (P<0.01) in control diet followed by 5% SCP diet and lowest (P<0.01) in 10% SCP diet. The crude protein and nitrogen free extract digestibility was highest (P<0.01) in 5% SCP diet and control diet, respectively. The ether extract digestibility was lowest (P<0.01) in 10% SCP diet. Further, the inclusion of SCP at 5 and 10% in the diets has no significant (P>0.05) effect on duodenum, jejunum and ileum villi length, crypt depth and their ratios among different groups. It was concluded that SCP can incorporated up to 10 % in pig diets without affecting the growth performance and gut health in pigs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aderolu A Z, Lyayl E A and Onilude A A. 2007. Performance, organ relative weight serum and hematology parameters in broiler finisher fed biodegraded brewers dried grain. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 6: 204-208.

AOAC. 2019. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 21st edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Brenne T, Naess B and Farstad L. 1974. The nutritive value, for growing pigs, of single cell protein (Candida utilis) produced from sulphite spent liquor. Acta Agriculture Scandinavica 24: 3-6.

Cruz A, Hakenasen I M, Skugor A, Mydland L T, Akesson C P, Hellestveit S S, Sorby R, Press C M and Overland M. 2019. Candida utilis yeast as a protein source for weaned piglets: Effects on growth performance and digestive function. Livestock Science 226: 31-39.

FAO. 2004. The State of Food Insecurity in the World, Addressing Food Insecurity in Protracted Crises. Food and Agricultural Organization. Rome, Italy.

Fevrier C and Seve B. 1976. Incorporation of spirulina (Spirulina maxima) into pig diets. Chemistry Abstracts 86: 421-431.

Hellwing A L F, Tauson A H, Skrede A and Kjos N P. 2007a. Bacterial protein meal effects on protein and energy metabolism in pigs. Animals 1:45-54.

Hellwing A L F, Tauson A H, Skrede A, Kjos N P and Ahlstrom O. 2007b. Bacterial protein meal in diets for pigs and minks: comparative studies on protein turnover rate and urinary excretion of purine base derivatives. Achieves of Animal Nutrition 61: 425- 443.

Hombegowda G P, Suresh B N, Shivakumar M C, Ravikumar P, Girish B C, Rudrappa S M and Indresh H C. 2021. Growth performance, carcass traits and gut health of broiler chickens fed diets incorporated with single cell protein. Animal Bioscience 34: 1951-1962

Hu L, Che L, Su G, Xuan Y, Luo G, Han F, Wu Y, Tian G, Wu C, Fang Z and Lin Y. 2014. Inclusion of yeast-derived protein in weanling diet improves growth performance, intestinal health, and anti-oxidative capability of piglets. Czech Journal of Animal Science 59: 327-336.

Hugh W I, Dominy W and Duerr E. 1985. Evaluation of dehydrated spirulina (Spirulina platensis) as a protein replacement in swine starter diets. Research extension series College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii, Cooperative Extension Service (USA).

Krohina V and Nesterov N. 2000. Microbial protein produced by hydrolysis of rye in feed mixtures for pigs. Svinovodstvo (Moskva) 3: 13-14.

Landell L C, Kronka R N, Thomaz M C and Curtarelli S M. 1994. Utilizacao da levedura de centrifugacao da vinhaca (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) como fonte protéica para leitoes na fase inicial (10-30 kg PV). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 23: 283-291.

Linder T. 2019. Making the case for edible microorganisms as an integral part of a more sustainable and resilient food production system. Food Security 11: 265-278.

Miyada V S, Lavorenti A, Packer I U and Menten J F M. 1997. Dried yeast as a protein source for weanling pigs (10 to 28 kg BW). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 26: 216-326

Monteiro A N T R, Bertol T M, De Oliveira P A V, Dourmad J Y, Coldebella A and Kessler A M. 2017. The impact of feeding growing finishing pigs with reduced dietary protein levels on performance, carcass traits, meat quality and environmental impacts, Livestock Science 198: 162-169.

Naess B and Slagsuold P. 1973. The nutritive value for growing pigs of single cell protein (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) produced from sulphite spent liquor. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavia 14: 160-167.

Nasi M. 1982. Nutritive value of Eurolysine bacterial protein and Pekilo protein for growing pigs. Agriculture and Food Science 54: 263-269.

Newport M J and Keal H D. 1980. Artificial rearing of pigs: Effect of replacing dried skim-milk by a single-cell protein (Pruteen) on performance and digestion of protein. British Journal of Nutrition 44: 161-170.

NRC. 2012. Nutrient Requirements of Swine,11th edn. National Research Council, The National Academics Press, Washington, DC.

Overland M, Tauson A H, Shearer K and Skrede A. 2010. Evaluation of methane-utilising bacteria products as feed ingredients for monogastric animals. Achieves of Animal Nutrition 64: 171-189.

Pearson V, Ewan R C and Zimmerman D R. 1978. Energy evaluation of a yeast single-cell protein product for young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 47: 488-491.

Shelton J L, Heman M D, Strode R M, Brashear G L, Ellis M, Mckeith F K, Bidner T D and Southern L L. 2001. Effect of different protein sources in growth and carcass traits in growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79: 2428–2435.

Skrede A, Berge G M, Storebakken T, Herstad O, Aarstad K G and Sundstol F. 1998. Digestibility of bacterial protein grown on natural gas in mink, pigs, chicken and Atlantic salmon. Animal Feed Science and Technology 76: 103-116.

Slagle S P and Zimmerman D R. 1979. Evaluation of a yeast cell protein with young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 49: 1252-1260.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. Iowa state University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Suman G, Nupur M, Anuradha S and Pradeep B. 2015. Single cell protein production: a review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 4: 251-262.

Tegbe S B and Zimmerman D R. 1977. Evaluation of a yeast single cell protein in pig diets. Journal of Animal Science 45: 1309-1316.

Tilman D and Clark M. 2014. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515: 518–522.

Van Zanten H H E, Mollenhorst H, Klootwijk C W, Van Middelaar C E and De Boer I J M. 2016. Global food supply: Land use efficiency of livestock systems. International Journal of Life Cycle Assess 21: 747–758

Wang J P, Kim J D, Kim J E and Kim I H. 2013. Amino acid digestibility of single cell protein from Corynebacterium ammoniagenes in growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 180: 111-114.

Whittemore C T and Moffat I W. 1977. Performance of growing pigs fed dried microbial cells (Methylomonas methylotropha). Journal of Agriculture Science 88: 241-243.

Zhang H Y, Piao X S, Li P, Yi J Q, Zhang Q, Li Q Y, Liu J D and Wang G Q. 2013. Effects of single cell protein replacing fish meal in diet on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphology in weaned pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 26: 1320.

Published

2026-10-27

Issue

Section

Animal Production

How to Cite

Bypanahalli, S. (2026). Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Gut Morphometry of Pigs Fed Single Cell Protein Incorporated Diets. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 96(10). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v96i10.179413
Citation