Evaluation of the sperm migration capacity of crossbred dairy cattle bull semen vis-à-vis field fertility trials


152 / 51

Authors

  • Himanshu Bhatia Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 India
  • Prahlad Singh Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 India
  • S S Sidhu Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i7.21747

Keywords:

Cattle, Cervical mucus penetration test, Fertility trials, Polyacrylamide gel, Semen

Abstract

Crossbred dairy cattle bulls (6) were subjected to semen evaluation study twice a week for sperm migration capacity in bovine cervical mucus (BCM) and poly-acrylamide gel (PAG). Cervical mucus from respective cows subsequently inseminated with same semen, was tested for sperm penetration test (SPT). PAG was prepared according to standard procedures and stored at 4°C till further use. Different grades of PAG (2% and 3%) were examined for transparency, spinbarkeit, pH and visible gelification before using for sperm migration assay. Field fertility trials based on pregnancy outcome by assigning 10 cows/bull were conducted simultaneously to BCM penetration test (BCMPT) and PAG-SPT. 2% PAG was better in assessing sperm penetration distance than 3% PAG, however, the values differed nonsignificantly. Sperm migration in BCM was better than sperm migration in PAG, and differences were significant for semen of respective bulls. The pregnancy outcome from the bull (FC-1207) having maximum sperm penetration distance (SPD) in BCM (fresh semen, 38.63 ± 0.26 mm/20 min; extended semen, 37.39 ± 0.19 mm/20min; frozen semen, 36.85 ± 0.21 mm/20min), 2% PAG (fresh, 37.44 ± 0.54 mm/20min; extended, 36.60 ± 0.34 mm/20 min; frozen, 35.89 ± 0.44 mm/ 20min) were around 58.53%, whereas, bull showing lower values of SPD in BCM and 2% PAG had lower pregnancy outcome. Six bulls under study indicated a lot of individual variation for SPD and pregnancy outcome, highlighting lower pregnancy outcome for bulls showing less SPD of sperm from fresh and frozen semen. Positive correlations were exhibited between different penetration tests and pregnancy outcome as well as between BCMPT and PAG-SPT. PAG can thus substitute for bovine cervical mucus and for assessing the sperm migration ability of various bulls used for breeding programme beforehand. Positive correlations between these tests and pregnancy outcome based on field fertility trials indicates importance of these tests for evaluating the fertility of bulls particularly with PAG-SPT before subjecting them to field evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Das H N, Verma R P, Ansari M R and Majumdar A C. 1999. Assessment of fertilizing potential in crossbred breeding bulls by some current diagnostic approach in vitro. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 69(1): 27–31.

Eggert-Kruse W, Kalinga Schwalbach B, Tilgen W, Rohr G and Runnedaum B. 1993. Evaluation of polyacrylamide gel as substitute for human cervical mucus in sperm penetrations test. Fertility and Sterility 63(3): 540–49.

Galli A, Basethi M, Baldugge D, Martignoni, Bornaghi and Maffii M. 1991. Frozen bovine quality and bovine cervical mucus penetration test. Theriogenology 35(4): 837–44.

Goldstein M C, Wix L S, Foote R H, Feldschuh R and Feldschuh J. 1982. Migration of fresh and cryopreserved human spermatozoa in polyacrylamide gel. Fertility and Sterility 37: 668.

Kaushal G, Pangaonkar G R and Chaudhary K C. 2005. Evaluation of polyacrylamide gel as a substitute for bovine estrual mucus for sperm migration studies in buffalos. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 26(1): 11–13.

Kaushal G, Pangaonpar G R and Verma H K. 2004. A comparative study on sperm penetration in estral mucus and polyacrylamide gel in relation to seminal characteristics. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 25(2): 151–53.

Kummerfeld H L, Vasburgh J K, Lorton S P and Foote R H. 1981. Influence of bovine cervical mucus sample and storage conditions on sperm migration in vitro. Fertility and Sterility 35: 218–21.

Lorton S P, Kummerfeld H I and Foote R H.1981. Polyacrylamide as a substitute for cervical mucus in sperm migration tests. Fertility and Sterility 37: 668.

Matousek J, Riha J, Srsen V, Veselsky L and Louda F.1989. Penetration of cervical mucus and other body fluids by bull sperm in capillary tubes. Animal Reproduction Science 18: 161– 66.

Moghissi K S.1972. The function of cervix in fertility. Fertility and Sterility 23: 295–306.

Murase T, Opude K and Satok. 1990. Assessment of bull fertility using a mucus penetration test and human chorionic gonadotrophin stimulating test. Theriogenology 34(5): 801–12.

Overstreet J W and Katz D F.1997. Sperm transport and selection in the female genital tract. Development in Mammals-II. (Ed.) Johnson M. North Holland Publishing Co., New York.

Panchal M T.1988. ‘Studies on repeat breeding buffaloes with reference to cervical mucus character, immuno-infertility, progressive assay and treatment traits.’ MVSc thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand, India.

Predojevic R M and Miljkovic. 1984. sperm penetration through oestrual mucus in relation to optional insemination as time and bovine conception rate. Proceedings of 10th International Congress on Animal Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Dublin 3: 287.

Suttiyotin P, Thwaiter and Baillie N D. 1991. Relationship between the results of a modified sperm penetration test and a swim-up technique and the fertility of ram semen. Theriogenology 37(8): 851–57.

Tang Stephen, Claire Garett and Gordon Beker H W. 1999. Comparison of human cervical mucus and artificial sperm penetration media. Human Reproduction 14(11): 2812–17.

Zavos de P M and Correa M R. 1980. The pH of cervical and post coital test. Fertility and Sterility 34: 234–37.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-07-12

Published

2012-07-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bhatia, H., Singh, P., & Sidhu, S. S. (2012). Evaluation of the sperm migration capacity of crossbred dairy cattle bull semen vis-à-vis field fertility trials. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(7), 687–690. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i7.21747
Citation