Effect of diluters, breeds and storage period on boar semen characteristics


197 / 80

Authors

  • Shivanand Kanshi Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834006 India
  • Ravindra Kumar Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834006 India
  • M P Singh Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834006 India
  • M P Sinha Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834006 India
  • S K Singh Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834006 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i8.23000

Keywords:

Boar, Diluter, Kiev, Lactose egg yolk, Modena, Pig, Semen preservation

Abstract

The study was conducted on 54 semen samples obtained from 9 boars comprising 3 each of Large White Yorkshire, Tamworth and T & D (cross of Tamworth and Desi) by split sample technique to study the effect of different dilutors, genetic groups and hours of preservation on spermatozoa characteristics. The dilutors used were Kiev, Modena and lactose egg yolk (LEY). The sperm motility % was significantly highest in lactose egg yolk dilutor at all the hours of preservations. Irrespective of dilutors, the sperm motility% was significantly highest in T & D boars. Live sperm count was significantly highest in lactose egg yolk dilutor than Kiev and Modena during the hours of preservation in all the boar breeds. The difference in head abnormality % was nonsignificant in all the breeds and dilutors at all the hours of preservation except at 96 h. Highly significant effect of both hours of preservation and dilutors on the incidence of tail abnormality was noted during the study. The % of tail abnormality revealed an increasing trend with increase in the duration of preservation. On dilutor wise comparison, it indicated lower incidence of tail abnormality with lactose egg yolk dilutor at all hours of preservation. Therefore, it may be concluded that LEY diluter can be successfully used for preservation of boar spermatozoa at 15°C in a BOD incubator up to 96 h.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arhipovec A I. 1966. The use of diluents and preservatives for the storage of boar semen. Svinovodstvo, Mosk. 20 : (11) : 28–30. Animal Breeding Abstract 35 : 3877.

Hancock J L. 1959. Semen and testis characteristics and sexual behavior of boars. Journal of Agricultural Sciences Cambridge 53 : 313.

Johnson L A, Aalbers J G, Willems C M T and Sybesma W. 1981. Use of boar spermatozoa for artificial insemination. 1. Fertilizing capacity of fresh and frozen boar semen in sows on 36 farms. Journal of Animal Sciences 52: 1130.

Khan M H, Nath K C, Deka, B C, Naskar S, Bardoloi R K, Bhuyan D and Kumar S. 2012. Effect of different extendors on cryopreservation of Hampshire and crossbred boar semen. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82 (1): 24–27.

Khan M H, Nath K C, Deka, B C, Naskar S, Bardoloi R K, Bhuyan D and Sinha S. 2011. Physical characteristics of Hampshire and crossbred boar semen. Indian Veterinary Journal 88: 39–40.

Lalrintluanga K, Deka, B C, Borgohain B N, Sarmah B C. 2002. Study on preservation of boar semen at 5° and 15°C. Indian Veterinary Journal 79 (9): 920–23.

Pandey R P. 1993. ‘Studies on liquid preservation and potential fertility of boar semen.’ Ph.D. thesis. B A U Ranchi, Jharkhand. Park C S and Pursel V G. 1985. Effect of cooling rate and duration of freezing point plateau on boar sperm frozen in maxi- straws. Proceedings of first international conference on deep freezing boar semen, Uppsala, 25–27 Aug. PP. 267.

Rao M M, Ramachandraiah S V, Venkatamuni C A and Sreeraman P K. 1992. Studies on crossbred boar semen characteristics and preservation. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 13 (2): 141–42.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th edn, pp. 217–35.Iowa state University press.

Sone M, Chikyu M, Yoshida M, Kamba K and Ogasa A. 1992. Prolonged storage if boar semen in liquid form. Japanese Journal Swine Science 29 (1): 41–50.

Speight S M, Estienne M J, Harper,A F, Crawford R J, Knight J W and Whitaker B D. 2012. Effects of dietary supplementation with an organic source of selenium on characteristics of semen quality and in vitro fertility in boars. Journal of Animal Science 90 (3):761–70.

Tamuli M K, Rajkonwar C K and Goswami B K. 1986. Preservation of boar semen. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 7 (2): 70–72.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-08-13

Published

2012-08-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kanshi, S., Kumar, R., Singh, M. P., Sinha, M. P., & Singh, S. K. (2012). Effect of diluters, breeds and storage period on boar semen characteristics. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(8), 826–829. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i8.23000
Citation