Nutritional status of herbage and goats under different grazing management practices on semi-arid rangeland vegetation


337 / 77

Authors

  • S K Mahanta Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284 003 India
  • G H Pailan Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284 003 India
  • N C Verma Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284 003 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i9.23664

Keywords:

Goats, Grazing practices, Herbage mass, Nutritional status, Rangeland vegetation

Abstract

A grazing trial of 120 days duration was conducted in goats on rangeland vegetation to record herbage mass and its quality, and nutritional status of animals. Yearling female Barbari goats divided into groups G1, G2 and G3 of 9 animals each, were allowed to graze on 3 ha of vegetation (@ 9 animals/ha) during winter for 6.5 to 8 h daily following 3 different grazing management practices viz. continuous, rotational and deferred rotational, respectively. They were also supplemented with barley grain (@ 1.0% of body weight) as energy source. Availability of herbage mass (kg DM/ha) of grass dominated vegetation was comparatively higher (2910) under deferred rotational than rotational (2677) and continuous (2365) system of grazing management However, quality of herbage mass in terms of CP (4.57 to 4.70%), NDF (77.8 to 79.7%) and ADF (46.6 to 50.3%) was comparable among the different grazing management practices. Similarly average CP of mouth grab forage samples was comparable amongst the treatment groups and ranged from 10.7 to 11.9%. Daily feed (DM) intake was 506, 512 and 546 g in goats under G1, G2 and G3 groups, respectively, and the differences were nonsignificant among the groups. The digestibility of nutrients was statistically similar among the groups. Goats were also on similar plane of nutrition consuming comparable quantities of CP and TDN. Concentration of glucose, plasma protein and urea-nitrogen was similar in G1, G2 and G3 groups. It was concluded that at similar stocking rates, grazing management practices did not have any influence on herbage mass and its quality as well as nutrient utilization and blood metabolites in goats allowed to graze on rangeland vegetation of Bundelkhand with supplementation of barley.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.

Bakare A G and Chimonyo M. 2011. Seasonal variation in time spent foraging by indigenous goat genotypes in a semi-arid rangeland in South Africa. Livestock Science 135: 251–56.

Duncan D B.1955. Multiple range and multiple ‘F’ test. Biometrics 11: 1–42.

Dwivedi R N, Singh M, Sharma P, Pandey S, Meena B S, Tamankar M B, Sharma R K and Upadhyay J P. 2004. Nutritive-Cereal Based Rainfed Agro-ecosystem for Bundelkhand Region: Technology Assessment and Refinement through Institution Village Linkage Programme. Pp.20. Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi.

Goering H K and Van Soest P J. 1970. Forage Fibre Analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Hand Book No. 379, ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.

Gupta P C, Khatta V K and Mondal A B. 1992. Analytical Techniques in Animal Nutrition. Pp. 64–78. Directorate of Publications, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Hu H L, Lu D Y and Liu Y Z. 2007. Effect of supplementary feeding on growth performance and ruminal fermentation in winter season grazing sheep. Journal of Animal Feed Science 16: 460– 64.

Mahanta S K, Singh B B, Pailan G H, Verma N C and Kumar S. 2007. Effect of grazing management practices on nutritional status of grazing goats supplemented with barley grain during summer in Bundelkhand. Range Management and Agroforestry 28: 239–41.

Pailan G H, Verma N C and Pachauri V C. 2001. Impact of different systems of grazing management on growth performance in kids and lambs. Indian Journal of Animal Production 33: 33–35.

Papanikolau K, Karalazos A, Dotas D and Nitas D. 1993. Grazing capacity and herbage mass quality fluctuation and goats and sheep grazing behavior on grassland that came from burned shrubland. Animal Science Review 12: 63–64.

Patel M S, Singh N P, Gehlaut B S and Singh H S. 2004. Performance of Babari goats under different systems. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 74: 299–302.

Pavlu V, Hejcman M, Pavlu L, Gaisler J, Hejcmanova-NezerKova P and Meneses L. 2006. Changes in plant densities in a mesic species-rich grassland after imposing different grazing management treatments. Grass and Forage Science 61: 42–51.

Prajapita M C. 1970. Effect of different system of grazing by cattle on Lasiurus-Eleusine-Aristida grassland in the arid regions of Rajasthan. Annals of Arid Zone 9: 114–24.

Rai A K and Rai P. 2010. Role of silvipastoral system in increasing productivity of small ruminants. Range Management and Agroforestry 31: 102–08.

Sharma N. 2006. Forage Production and Utilization- Challenges Ahead. Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India. pp. 4.

Shinde A K, Karim S A, Patnayak B C and Mann J S. 1997. Dietary preference and grazing behavior of sheep on Cenchrus ciliaris pasture in a semi-arid region of India. Small Ruminant Research 26: 119–22.

Singh J B, Pradeep Behari and Rai S K. 2005. Annual and seasonal climate variability in a semi-arid region. Range Management and Agroforestry 26: 108–12.

Skerman P J and Riveros F. 1990. Tropical Grasses. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iwoa.

SPSS Inc. 1999. SPSS Base 10 Statistical Package for Windows. Chicago, IL, USA.

Sun H X and Zhou D W. 2009. Prediction of diet composition and intake of sheep grazing soyabean and maize residues. Journal of Applied Animal Research 35: 125–29.

Tadmor N H, Beighet A, Noy Meiv R W and Eyal E. 1975. An evaluation of calibrated weight estimated method for measuring production in annual vegetation. Journal of Range Management 28: 65–69.

Verma N C, Pailan G H and Pachauri V C. 2001. Effect of different grazing management systems on pasture quality and livestock production. Indian Journal of Animal Production 33: 26–28.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-09-11

Published

2012-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mahanta, S. K., Pailan, G. H., & Verma, N. C. (2012). Nutritional status of herbage and goats under different grazing management practices on semi-arid rangeland vegetation. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(9), 1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i9.23664
Citation