Comparison of DNA extraction methods and gene targets from Leptospira interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae for application in polymerase chain reaction


362 / 71

Authors

  • S ANITHA Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600007 India
  • G DHINAKAR RAJ Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600007 India
  • A RAJA Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600007 India
  • A THANGAVELU Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600007 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i10.24278

Keywords:

Analytical sensitivity, DNA extraction methods, Gene targets, Leptospira, Polymerase chain reaction

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the appropriate DNA extraction method and gene target from Leptospira interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae for subsequent application in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosis. DNA was extracted from pure cultures of Leptospira interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae, spiked serum and urine samples using 4 different protocols,viz. STET buffer method, boiling method, nucleospin kit and the QIAamp DNA extraction kit using LipL41, LigA/B and LipL32 genes as targets. The lowest concentration of DNA that showed a visible band in PCR was taken as its analytical sensitivity in terms of concentration of DNA for each type of sample, target gene and DNA extraction method respectively. It was observed that DNA extraction from suspected clinical human sera samples using the QIAamp kit with either LipL41 or LipL32 as targets were most suitable for diagnosis by PCR since it had the greatest sensitivity of detection in PCR and the lowest amount of contaminating protein in the extracted DNA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • S ANITHA, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600007 India
  • G DHINAKAR RAJ, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600007 India
  • A RAJA, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600007 India
  • A THANGAVELU, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600007 India

References

Bomfim M R Q, Stancioli E F B and Koury M C. 2007. Detection of pathogenic leptospires in urine from naturally infected cattle by nested PCR. Veterinary Journal 29: 486 – 89.

Dutta T K and Christopher M. 2005. Leptospirosis- an overview. Journal of Association of Physicians India 53: 451–51.

Goldstein S F and Charon N W. 1990. Multiple-exposure photographic analysis of a motile spirochete. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, USA 87: 4895 –99.

Hartskeerl R A. 2006. Leptospirosis: Current status and future trends. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 24: 30.

Koteeswaran A. 2006. Seroprevalence of leptospirosis in man and animals in Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 24: 329 – 31.

Lemarchand K, Berthiaume F, Maynard C, Harel J, Bayardelle P, Masson L and Brousseau R. 2005. Optimization of microbial DNA extraction and purification from raw wastewater samples for downstream pathogen detection by microarrays. Journal of Microbiology and Methods 63: 115–26.

Levett P N. 2001. Leptospirosis. Clinical Microbiology Review 14: 296 – 326.

Manterola L, Tejero-Garces A, Ficapal A, Shopayeva G, Blasco J M, Marin C M and Lopez-Gori I. 2003. Evaluation of PCR test for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in semen samples from rams. Veterinary Microbiology 92: 65–72.

Office International des Epizooties. 2005. Leptospirosis. Institute for international co-operation in Animal biological, An OIE collaborating centre, Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine 1–7.

Palaniappan R U, Chang Y F, Chang C F, Pan M J, Yang C W, Harpending P, Mcdonough S P, Dubovie Divers T, Qu J and Roe B. 2005. Evaluation of lig-based conventional and real time PCR for the detection of pathogenic leptospires. Molecular Cell Probes 19: 111–17.

Vinetz J M. 2001. Leptospirosis. Current Opinion on Infectious Diseases 14: 527 – 38.

Vinoth R, Dhinakar Raj G, Govindarajan R and Thiagarajan V. 2008. Detection of Leptospira and Brucella genomes in bovine semen using polymerase chain reaction. Tropical Animal Health Production 40: 323–29.

Vinoth R, Dhinakar Raj G, Govindarajan R and Thiagarajan V. 2008. Detection of Leptospira and Brucella genomes in bovine semen using polymerase chain reaction. Tropical Animal Health Production 40: 323–29.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-10-11

Published

2012-10-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ANITHA, S., RAJ, G. D., RAJA, A., & THANGAVELU, A. (2012). Comparison of DNA extraction methods and gene targets from Leptospira interrogans serovar icterohaemorrhagiae for application in polymerase chain reaction. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(10), 1133–1136. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i10.24278
Citation