Effect of magnesium sulphate on duration and dose requirement of thiopental sodium anesthesia in dogs undergoing experimental enterotomy


305 / 57

Authors

  • IBRAHIM HELAL Suez Canal University, Ismilia 41522 Egypt
  • MOHAMED EL DAHRAWY Suez Canal University, Ismilia 41522 Egypt

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i10.24289

Keywords:

Anesthesia, Dogs, Magnesium sulphate, Thiopental sodium

Abstract

Adult mongrel dogs (15) of either sex, 1.8±0.7-year-old and weighing 15.56±0.06 kg (mean±SE) were used in the study to evaluate the effect of pre-and intra-operative administration of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) on the duration and dose of thiopental sodium antesthesia undergoing enterotomy. All dogs were premedicated with intramuscular injection of chloropromazine hydrochloride 15 min prior to the injection of 2.5% thiopental sodium in group 1. In group 2, i/v administration of chloropromazine hydrochloride followed by a bolus of 50 mg/kg MgSO4 (10%) were used before injection of general anaesthesia. In group 3, the dogs received the same anesthetic protocol as in group 2 in addition to i/v infusion of MgSO4 (10%) @10 mg/kg/hr. Enterotomy model was created in all dogs and the mean operation time was 34 min. The results revealed that mean duration of anesthesia was significantly longer in groups 2 and 3 (43.40 and 57.60 min, respectively) as compared to group 1 (38.60 min). The mean total thiopental sodium dose in group 1 (32.10 mg/kg) was significantly greater than those of groups 2 and 3 (26.70 and 20.20 mg/kg respectively). It could be concluded that preoperative and intraoperative administration of MgSO4 prolong duration of anesthesia, decrease the total dose of thiopental sodium, and facilitate smooth recovery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • IBRAHIM HELAL, Suez Canal University, Ismilia 41522 Egypt
  • MOHAMED EL DAHRAWY, Suez Canal University, Ismilia 41522 Egypt

References

Akazawa S, Shimizu R, Nakaigawa Y., Ishii R, Ikeno S and Yamato R. 1997. Effects of magnesium sulphate on atrioventricular conduction times and surface electrocardiogram in dogs anaesthetized with sevoflurane. British Journal of Anaesthesia 78(1): 75–80.

Anagnostou T L, Sawas 1, Kazakos G M, Raptopoulos D, Ververidis H and Roubies N. 2008. Thiopental and halothane dose-sparing effects of magnesium sulphate in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia Analgesia 35(2): 93–99.

Duncan D B. 1995. Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics 11, 1–42.

Fawcett W J, Haxby E J and Male D A. 1999. Magnesium: physiology and pharmacology. British Journal of Anaesthesia 83(2): 302–20.

Feria M, Abad F, Sanchez A and Abreu P. 1993. Magnesium sulphate injected subcutaneously suppress autonomy in peripherally deafferented rats. Pain 53(3): 287–93.

Gupta K, Vohra V and Sood J. 2006. The role of magnesium as an adjuvant during general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 61(11): 1058– 63.

Hall L W, Clarke K W and Trim C M. 2001. Principle of sedation, analgesia and premedication. Veterinary Anaesthesia. 10th edn, pp.79, 402–04. W.B. Saunders.

Jackson C B and Drobatz K J. 2004. Iatrogenic magnesium overdose: 2 case reports. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 14(2): 115–23.

James M F. 1992. Clinical use of magnesium infusion in anaesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 74(1): 129–36.

Kara H, Sahin N, Ulusan V and Aydogdu T. 2002. Magnesium infusion reduces perioperative pain. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 19(1): 52–56.

Koinig H, Wallner T, Marhofer P, Andel H, Horauf K and Mayer N. 1998. Magnesium sulphate reduces intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements. Anesthesia and Analgesia 87(1): 206– 10.

Levaux C, Bonhomme V, Dewandre P Y, Brichant J F and Hans P. 2003. Effect of intra-operative magnesium sulphate on pain relief and patient comfort after major lumbar orthopaedic surgery. Anaesthesia 58(2): 131–35.

Mavrommati P D, Gabopoulou Z T, Papadimos C N, Petsikopoulos M G, Vrettou VA, Konstantinidou M G and Velmachou K G. 2004. The perioperative infusion of low doses of magnesium sulphate reduces analgesic requirements in patients undergoing abdominal hernioplasty. Acute Pain 5: 81–87.

Nakaigawa Y, Akazawa S, Shimizu R, Ishii R, Ikeno S, Inoue S and Yamato R. 1997. Effects of magnesium sulphate on the cardiovascular system, coronary circulation and myocardial metabolism in anaesthetized dogs. British Journal of Anaesthesia 79(3): 363–68.

Nakayama T, Nakayama H, Miyamoto M and Hamlin, R L. 1999. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of magnesium sulfate in healthy dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 13(5): 485–90.

Nastou H, Sarros G, Palta M, Nastos A, Sarrou V and Anastassopoulou J. 1996. Fluctuations in serum magnesium levels during total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. Magnesium Research 9(1): 47–53.

Ray M, Bhattacharjee D P, Hajra B, Pal R and Chatterijee N. 2010. Effect of clonidine and magnesium sulphate on anaesthetic consumption, haemodynamics and postoperative recovery: A comparative study. Indian Joutnal of Anaesthesia 54(2): 137– 41.

Snedecor G, Cochran W and Cox D. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. The Iowa state University Press.

Schulz-Stubner S, Wettmann G, Reyle-Hahn S M and Rossaint R. 2001. Magnesium as part of balanced general anaesthesia with propofol, remifentanil and mivacurium: a double-blind, randomized prospective study in 50 patients. European Journal of Anesthesiology 18 (11): 723–29.

Telci L, Esen F, Akcora D, Erden T, Canbolat A T and Akpir K. 2002. Evaluation of effects of magnesium sulphate in reducing intraoperative anaesthetic requirements. British Journal of Anaesthesia 89(4): 594–98.

Woolf C J and Thompson S W. 1991. The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl- D-aspartic acid receptor activation: Implications for the treatment of post injury pain and hypersensitivity states. Pain 44(3): 293–99.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-10-11

Published

2012-10-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

HELAL, I., & DAHRAWY, M. E. (2012). Effect of magnesium sulphate on duration and dose requirement of thiopental sodium anesthesia in dogs undergoing experimental enterotomy. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(10), 1163–1165. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i10.24289
Citation