Physical and physiological changes in donkeys during pack load


301 / 69

Authors

  • YASH PAL National Research Centre on Equines, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334 001 India
  • A K GUPTA National Research Centre on Equines, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334 001 India
  • S KUMAR National Research Centre on Equines, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334 001 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i10.24316

Keywords:

Draughtability, Donkey, Work rest cycle, Work performance

Abstract

Draughtability studies were carried out with adult, healthy and trained donkeys under 2 different work schemes i.e. continuous work and work-rest-work scheme with 2 different sets of loads (load equal to 40 and 50 % of their body weights). To assess their capability and work stress on them, physical observations, viz. unwillingness to continue operation, legs coordination, frothing, excitement, tongue protrusion etc. and physiological observations (rectal temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate) were recorded at fixed intervals. Under pack load equivalent to 40% of their body weight, donkeys worked for 4 h and 5 h under continuous as well as under work-rest-work cycle, respectively, while with 50% pack load, donkeys worked for 4 h under both work plans. After using standard fatigue score analysis technique, it was observed that donkeys attained a fatigue score of 6 and 4 out of 16 under continuous and work-rest- work cycle, respectively, for 40% as pack load while the fatigue score of 10 and 2 was observed under continuous and work-rest-work cycles, respectively, for 50% pack load. Intermittent rest in between work reduced the stress on these animals and resulted in increasing the work periods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • YASH PAL, National Research Centre on Equines, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334 001 India
  • A K GUPTA, National Research Centre on Equines, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334 001 India
  • S KUMAR, National Research Centre on Equines, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334 001 India

References

Astrand P O and Rodhal K. 1970. Textbook of Work Physiology. Ist edn. McGraw Hill, New York.

Bhatt Y C, Verma R N, Sharma A K and Tiwari Ghanshyam. 2005. Draughtability assessment of Indian donkey through fatigue analysis. Indian Journal of Animal Research 39 (1): 1 – 7.

Kapoor R and Upadhyay R C. 1993. Physiological responses and acid-base status of rural working buffaloes. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 46: 227–29.

Maurya N L. 1992. Draftability of donkeys. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(2): 145–51.

Minka N S and Ayo J O. 2007. Effects of shade provision on some physiological parameters, behavior and performance of pack donkeys (Equinus asinus) during the hot dry season. Journal of Equine Science 18: 39–46.

Pal Y, Ghei J C, Gupta A K and Yadav M P. 1998. Comparative studies on heat tolerance in ponies and donkeys. Indian Veterinary Journal 75: 78–79.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th edn. Oxford and IBH Publications Company, New Delhi.

Upadhyay R C. 1989. Performance limiting factors in draught animals: Can they be manipulated to improve output? Draught Animals in Rural Development. (Eds) Hoffman D, Nari J and Petheram R J. ACIAR Proceedings No. 27, Canberra, ACIAR.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-10-11

Published

2012-10-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PAL, Y., GUPTA, A. K., & KUMAR, S. (2012). Physical and physiological changes in donkeys during pack load. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(10), 1230–1232. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i10.24316
Citation