Effect of sorghum stover-oat silage on intake and utilization of nutrients in growing heifers

K K SINGH; M M DAS; S B MAITY

doi:10.56093/ijans.v82i10.24319

Authors

K K SINGH Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284003 India
M M DAS Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284003 India
S B MAITY Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284003 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i10.24319

Keywords:

Sorghum stover, Stover-oat silage, Intake in heifers

Abstract

Growing Tharparkar heifers (14) were randomly divided into 2 groups of 7 animals in each. The heifers of control group (T1) were fed on dry sorghum stover based ration along with concentrate mixture, while the heifers of group T2 were offered ensiled forage prepared by ensiling mixture of dry sorghum stover, oat with 2% molasses along with concentrate mixture for 90 days. The results indicated that the stover-oat silage fed heifers (T2) had a significantly higher DM intake as compared to the stover fed group (T1) without affecting the intake of concentrate mixture. The apparent digestibility coefficient of nutrients was similar between groups; however, the digestibility coefficient of ADF and CF was significantly lower for stover-based diet (T1). The average daily weight gain was significantly higher in heifers consumed stover- oat silage diet than those of stover based diet. Thus it was concluded that the stover-oat silage could be used as summer forage as it has a significant effect on DM intake as well as average daily gain in heifers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

K K SINGH, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284003 India
M M DAS, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284003 India
S B MAITY, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh 284003 India

References

AOAC. 1990. Official Method of Analysis 15th edn. Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington DC.

Choi Y J, Lee S S, Song J Y, Choi N J, Sung H G, Yun S G and Ha J K. 2003. Effects of dietary acidogenicity values on rumen fermentation characteristics and nutrients digestibility. Asian- Australian Journal of Animal Science 16: 1625–33.

ICAR. 1998. Nutrient Requirement of Livestock and Poultry. S.K. Ranjhan.2nd revised edn. New Delhi.

Mahanta S K, Pailan G H, Singh K K and Pachauri V C. 2005. Performance of crossbred heifers on grainless ration. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 22: 116–19.

NRC. 1981. Effect of Environment on Nutrient Requirement of Domestic Animals. National Academic Press, Washington DC. Singh B, Chaudhary J L and Yadav C M. 2009. Effect of feeding different levels of green maize on the performance of heifers. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 26: 151–55.

Singh A P and Pandit N N. 1978. Studies on fermentation of sorghum silage during storage: effect of urea and molasses. Animal Feed Science and Technology 3: 299–307.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1968. Statistical Methods. I.B.H. Publishing Company, Calcutta.

Tafaj M, Kolaneci V, Junck B, Maulbetsch A, Steingass H and Drochner W. 2005. Influence of fiber content and concentrate level on chewing activity, ruminal digestion, digesta passage rate and nutrient digestibility in dairy cows in late lactation. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 18: 1116–24.

Yang X, Wang Z, Yu Z, Sun Q and Zhang X. 2010. Effect of different roughage composition on fermentation quality of total mixed ration. Pratacultural Science 27: 139–43.

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–97.