Effect of cryotop vitrification method on oocytes at different meiotic stages and embryo development in vitro


Abstract views: 152 / PDF downloads: 40

Authors

  • LI XIANGCHEN Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • YAO YAXIN Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • WANG YIPENG Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • LI HEPING Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • GUAN WEIJUN Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • MA YUEHUI Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i11.25133

Keywords:

Bovine, Embryos, Oocyte, Vitrification

Abstract

The effectiveness of existing procedures based on viable embryos per oocyte frozen remains low compared to use of fresh oocytes in cattle, and the probable causes of the freezing-induced reduction in oocyte developmental competence include chromosome, cytoskeleton disruption, or even the choice of the frozen stage of the oocytes. In the present study, after vitrification, the survival rate of GV and MI oocytes were significantly lower than those in MII. The vitrifid GV oocyte showed some chromosomes dispersed and less condensed, The vitrifid MI oocytes with “Fading’’ and discontinuous staining pattern were as having an abnormal microfilament distribution. The stage of GV and MI, both cleavage rate and blastocyst formation rate were reduced significantly. Therefore, the cryopreservation of GV or MI oocytes seems could not instead of the MII oocytes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • LI XIANGCHEN, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • YAO YAXIN, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • WANG YIPENG, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • LI HEPING, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • GUAN WEIJUN, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China
  • MA YUEHUI, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193 PR China

References

Aono N, Abe Y, Hara K, Sasada H, Sato E and Yoshida H. 2005.Production of live offspring from mouse germinal vesicle- stage oocytes vitrified by a modified step-wise method, SWEID. Fertility and Sterility 84:1078–82.

Brackett B G and Zuelke K A.1993. Analysis of factors involved in the in vitro production of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 39:43–64.

Bing Y Z, Hirao Y, Iga K, Che L M, Takenouchi N, Kuwayama M, Fuchimoto D, Rodriguez-Martinez H and Nagai T. 2002. In vitro maturation and glutathione synthesis of porcine oocytes in the presence or absence of cysteamine under different oxygen tension: role of cumulus cells. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 14: 125–31.

Chen S U, Lien Y R, Chao K H, Ho H N, Yang Y S and Lee T Y. 2003. Effects of cryopreservation on meiotic spindles of oocytes and its dynamics after thawing: clinical implications in oocyte freezing – a review article. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 202 101–07.

Diez C, Heyman Y, Le Bourhis D, Guyader-Joly C, Degrouard J and Renard J P. 2001. Delipidating in vitro -produced bovine zygotes: Effect on further development and consequences for freezability. Theriogenology 55: 923–36.

Dobrinsky J R. 2002. Advancements in cryopreservation of domestic animal embryos. Theriogenology 57:285–302.

Eroglu A, Toth T L and Toner M. 1998. Alter ations of the cytoskeleton and polyploidy induced by cryopreservation of metaphase II mouse oocytes. Fertility and Sterility 69:944–57. Fuku E, Xia L and Downey B R. 1995. Ultrastructural changes in bovine oocytes cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology 32:139–56.

Homburg R. 2009.Androgen circle of polycystic ovary syndrome. Human Reproduction 24: 1548 - 55.

Huang S Z, Huang Y, Chen M J, Zeng F Y, Ren Z R and Zeng Y T. 2001. Selection of in vitro produced, transgenic embryos by nested PCR for efficient production of transgenic goats. Theriogenology 56 545–56.

Gomes C M, Silva C A, Acevedo N, Baracat E, Serafini P and Smith G D. 2008. Influence of vitrification on mouse metaphase II oocyte spindle dynamics and chromatin alignment. Fertility and Sterility 90:1396–1404.

Jones A, Van Blerkom J, Davis P and Toledo A A. 2004. Cryopreservation of metaphase II human oocytes effects mitochondrial membrane potential: implications for developmental competence. Human Reproduction 19: 1861–66.

Khosravi-Farsani S, Sobhani A, Amidi F and Mahmoudi R.. 2010. Mouse oocyte vitrification: the effects of two methods on maturing germinal vesicle breakdown oocytes. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 27(5): 233–38.

Kubota C, Yang X, Dinnyes A, Todoroki J,Yamakuchi H, Mizoshita K, Inohae S and Tabara N.1998. In vitro and in vivo survival of frozen-thawed bovine oocytes after IVF, nuclear transfer, and parthenogenetic activation. Molecular Rreproduction and Development 51: 281–86.

Li X C, Yao Y X, ZHANG Y, Jin D P, Wang Y P, Guan W J and Ma Y H. 2011. Different reprogramming ability of fibroblast cells and cumulus cells after treated with trichostatin A for nuclear transfer. Indian Journal of Animal Science 81 (4): 382–87.

Lim J M, Fukui Y and Ono H.1992. Developmental competence of bovine oocytes frozen at various maturation stages followed by in vitro maturation and fertilization. Theriogenology 37: 351– 61.

Magnusson V, Feitosa W B, Goissis M D, Yamada C, Tavares L M, D’Avila and Assumpção M E. 2008. Bovine oocyte vitrification: effect of ethylene glycol concentrations and meiotic stages. Animal Reproduction Science 106:265–73.

Martino A, Songsasen N and Leibo S P. 1996. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biology of Reproduction. 54: 1059 –69.

Mark G Larman, Courtney B Sheehan and David K Gardner.2006.Calcium-free vitrification reduces cryoprotectant- induced zona pellucida hardening and increases fertilization rates in mouse oocytes. Reproduction 131: 53 - 61.

Men H, Monson R L and Rutledge J J. 2002. Effect of meiotic stages and maturation protocols on bovine oocyte’s resistance to cryopreservation. Theriogenology 57:1095–103.

Parks J E and Ruffing N A. 1992 Factors affecting low temperature survival of mammalian oocytes. Theriogenology 37: 59–73.

Park K E, Kwon I K, Han M S and Niwa K. 2005. Effects of partial removal of cytoplasmic lipid on survival of vitrified germinal vesicle stage pig oocytes. Journal of Reproduction and Development 51(1): 151–60.

Pedro P B, Yokoyama E, Zhu S E, Yoshida N, Valdez Jr D M,Tanaka M. 2005. Permeability of mouse oocytes and embryos at various developmental stages to five cryoprotectants. Journal of Reproduction and Development 51:235–46.

Rho G J, Kim S, Yoo J G, Balasubramanian S, Lee H J and Choe S Y.2002. Microtubulin configuration and mitochondrial distribution after ultra-rapid cooling of bovine oocytes. Molecular Rreproduction and Development 63:464–70.

Rienzi L, Martinez F, Ubaldi F, Minasi M G, Iacobelli M, Tesarik J and Greco E.2004. Polscope analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing and thawing procedures. Human Reproduction 19:655–59.

Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Baroni E, Colamaria S, Sapienza F and Ubaldi F.2010. Embryo development of fresh versus vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Human Reproduction 25:66–73.

Rizos D, Ward F M P, Boland M P, Lonergan P. 2001. Effect of culture system on the yield and quality of bovine blastocysts as assessed by survival after vitrification. Theriogenology 56: 1– 16.

Saragusty J and Arav A. 2011. Current progress in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification. Reproduction 141: 1 - 19.

Thouas G A, Trounson A O, Wolvetang E J and Jones G M. 2004.Mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse oocytes results in preimplantation embryo arrest in vitro. Biology of Reproduction 71:1936–42.

Trounson A, Pushett D, Maclellan LJ, Lewis I and Gardner D K. 1994.Current status of IVM/IVF and embryo culture in human and farm animals. Theriogenology 41:57–66.

Ohboshi S, Fujihara N, Yoshida T and Tomagane H. 1998. Ultrastructure of bovine in vitro -produced blastocysts cryopreserved by vitrification. Zygote 6:17–26.

Otoi T, Yamamoto K, Koyama and Suzuki T. 1995. In vitro fertilization and development of immature andmature bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ethyleneglycol with sucrose. Cryobiology 34: 36–41.

Ubaldi F, Anniballo R, Romano S, Baroni E, Albricci L, Colamaria S, Capalbo A, Sapienza F, Vajta G and Rienzi L. 2010. Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility program. Human Reproduction 25: 1199 - 1205.

Wee G, Koo D B, Song B S, Kim J S, Kang M J, Moon S J, Kang Y K, Lee K K and Han Y M. 2006. Inheritable histone h4 acetylation of somatic chromatins in cloned embryos. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281: 6048–57.

Wu B, Tong J and Leibo S P. 1999. Effects of cooling germinal vesicle-stage bovine oocytes on meiotic spindle formation following in vitro maturation. Molecular Reproduction and Development 54: 388–95.

Downloads

Submitted

2012-11-19

Published

2012-11-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

XIANGCHEN, L., YAXIN, Y., YIPENG, W., HEPING, L., WEIJUN, G., & YUEHUI, M. (2012). Effect of cryotop vitrification method on oocytes at different meiotic stages and embryo development in vitro. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82(11), 1311–1316. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v82i11.25133
Citation