Comparative evaluation of conventional diagnostic methods for detection of bovine cryptosporidiosis


309 / 35

Authors

  • R VENU
  • B R LATHA
  • S ABDUL BASITH
  • C SREEKUMAR
  • G DHINAKAR RAJ
  • M RAMAN

Keywords:

Cattle, Cryptosporidium, Diagnostics, Microscopy

Abstract

Cryptosporidium is an important enteropathogen that causes diarrhoea in diary calves. Keeping in view of the
importance, there is a need for simple and inexpensive diagnostic and screening tests for the detection of Cryptosporidium
infection in dairy calves. In the present study, 4 conventional coprological detection methods were compared and
evaluated in detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in dung samples of dairy calves. Direct smear (DS) examination
detected 21 positives (3.15%) for Cryptosporidium oocysts, out of 667 samples screened. In faecal concentration
techniques, sugar floatation (SF) and formal-ethyl acetate (FEA) methods detected 39 (5.85%) and 41 (6.15%) positives,
respectively. A total of 74 positives were detected by modified Ziehl-Neelsen (mZN) staining technique with a prevalence
of 11.09%, showing that mZN technique as the most sensitive method of detecting Cryptosporidium oocysts. Statistical
analysis revealed that highly significant difference was observed between DS and SF, FEA and mZN techniques. Inclusive
and exclusive detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts by various conventional microscopic methods were recorded. In
conclusion, among the conventional microscopic methods followed in the present study, mZN staining technique was
more sensitive for detection of Cryptosporidium infection. Further, mZN staining technique is more appropriate and
recommended to its use for developing countries like India for diagnosis of Cryptosporidium infection in bovine calves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • R VENU
    Assistant Professor (SS) and Head,
    Department. of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science, Tirupati 517 502 Andhra Pradesh
  • B R LATHA
    Professor,Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India

  • S ABDUL BASITH
    Professor and Head, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India


  • C SREEKUMAR
    Professor, SBRS, Sandynallah, Ooty, Tamil Nadu, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India

  • G DHINAKAR RAJ
    Professor, Department of Animal Biotechnology, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India



  • M RAMAN
    Professor, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

VENU, R., LATHA, B. R., BASITH, S. A., SREEKUMAR, C., RAJ, G. D., & RAMAN, M. (2013). Comparative evaluation of conventional diagnostic methods for detection of bovine cryptosporidiosis. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 83(2). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/27242