Comparative evaluation of conventional diagnostic methods for detection of bovine cryptosporidiosis
309 / 35
Keywords:
Cattle, Cryptosporidium, Diagnostics, MicroscopyAbstract
Cryptosporidium is an important enteropathogen that causes diarrhoea in diary calves. Keeping in view of theimportance, there is a need for simple and inexpensive diagnostic and screening tests for the detection of Cryptosporidium
infection in dairy calves. In the present study, 4 conventional coprological detection methods were compared and
evaluated in detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in dung samples of dairy calves. Direct smear (DS) examination
detected 21 positives (3.15%) for Cryptosporidium oocysts, out of 667 samples screened. In faecal concentration
techniques, sugar floatation (SF) and formal-ethyl acetate (FEA) methods detected 39 (5.85%) and 41 (6.15%) positives,
respectively. A total of 74 positives were detected by modified Ziehl-Neelsen (mZN) staining technique with a prevalence
of 11.09%, showing that mZN technique as the most sensitive method of detecting Cryptosporidium oocysts. Statistical
analysis revealed that highly significant difference was observed between DS and SF, FEA and mZN techniques. Inclusive
and exclusive detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts by various conventional microscopic methods were recorded. In
conclusion, among the conventional microscopic methods followed in the present study, mZN staining technique was
more sensitive for detection of Cryptosporidium infection. Further, mZN staining technique is more appropriate and
recommended to its use for developing countries like India for diagnosis of Cryptosporidium infection in bovine calves.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Issue
Section
Articles
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
How to Cite
VENU, R., LATHA, B. R., BASITH, S. A., SREEKUMAR, C., RAJ, G. D., & RAMAN, M. (2013). Comparative evaluation of conventional diagnostic methods for detection of bovine cryptosporidiosis. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 83(2). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/27242