Role of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes in ruminant feeding


373 / 126

Authors

  • M CHANDRASEKHARAIAH National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 030 India
  • PRASANNA KUMAR D National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 030 India
  • SUNIL SINGH SANTOSH National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 030 India
  • C PALANIVEL National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 030 India
  • SRINU CHIGURUPATI National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA
  • C S PRASAD National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 030 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i4.39826

Keywords:

Biotechnology, Exogenous enzyme, Nutrition, Ruminants

Abstract

The complex crop residues and straws are main feed resource available for feeding livestock in developing countries like India. These straws mainly consist of ligno-cellulose complex, which is not very easily and fully digested. Several attempts were tried to address the issue but met with varying degree of success. One of the approaches which holds promise is the use of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme in animals that are mainly fed on crop residue based diets. The major enzymes involved in cellulose hydrolysis are endocellulase (endoglucanase, endo- ß–1, 4-glucanase, carboxymethyl cellulase or ß-1, 4-glucan glucanohydrolase; E.C. 3.2.1.4), exocellulase (exoglucanase, exo-ß-1, 4-glucanase, cellulose ß-1, 4-cellobiosidase; E.C. 3.2.1.91), and ß-glucosidase (cellobiase or glucohydrolase, E.C. 3.2.1.21). Many of these enzymes are being used worldwide in numerous industrial applications such as food industry in addition to animal feed industry. Use of the exogenous enzymes in cattle improved the digestibility of feeds, growth rate and milk production although results obtained were inconsistent. This review gives an insight into various exogenous fibrolytic enzymes involved in cell wall digestion, probable mode of action, and their level of inclusion as productivity enhancer in ruminant feeding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beauchemin K A, Colombatto D, Morgavi D P and Yang W Z. 2003. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed Utilization by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 81: E37– E47.

Beauchemin K A, Jones S D M, Rode L M and Sewalt V J H. 1997. Effects of fibrolytic enzyme in corn or barley diets on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77: 645–53.

Beauchemin K A, Yang W Z and Rode L M. 1999a. Effects of grain source and enzyme additive on site and extent of nutrient digestion in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 378–90.

Beauchemin K A, Rode L M and Karren D. 1999b. Use of feed enzymes in feedlot finishing diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79: 243–46.

Beauchemin K A, Rode L M and Sewalt V J H. 1995. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 75: 641– 44.

Beauchemin K A , Rode L M , Maekawa M , Morgavi D P and Kanpen R. 2000. Evaluation of non-starch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cows diets. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 543–53.

Beg Q K , Kapoor M, Mahajan L and Hoondal G S. 2001. Microbial xylanases and their industrial applications: a review. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 56: 326–38.

Bhat M K and Hazlewood G P. 2001. Enzymology and other characteristics of cellulases and xylanases. Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition. Page 11. (Eds) Bedford M and Partridge G. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK.

Bhat M K. 2000. Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances 18: 355–83.

Chamberlain D G and Roberston S. 1992. The effects of addition of various enzyme mixtures on the fermentation of perennial ryegrass silage and on its nutritional value for milk production in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37: 257–64.

Chandrasekharaiah M, Thulasi A, Vijayarani K, Prasanna K D, Santosh S S, Palanivel C, Lyju J V and Sampath K T 2012a. Expression and biochemical characterization of two novel feruloyl esterases derived from fecal samples of Rusa unicolor and Equus burchelli. Gene 500 (1) 134–39.

Chandrasekharaiah M, Thulasi A, Bagath M, Prasanna K D, Santosh S S, Palanivel C, Lyju J V and Sampath K T. 2012b. Identification of cellulase genes from the metagenomes of Equus burchelli fecal samples and functional characterization of a novel bifunctional cellulolytic enzyme. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 167(1): 132–41.

Chandrasekharaiah M, Thulasi A, Bagath M, Prasanna K D, Santosh S S, Palanivel C, Lyju J V and Sampath K T. 2011. Molecular cloning, expression and characterization of a novel feruloyl esterase enzyme from the symbionts of termite (Coptotermes formosanus) gut. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Reports 44 (1): 52–57.

Chen J and Stokes M R. 1992. Effects of enzyme treatments on the preservation and nutritive value of hay crop silage and corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 272.

Colombatto D. 2000. ‘Use of enzymes to improve fibre utilization in ruminants. A biochemical and in vitro rumen degradation assessment.’ Ph.D. Diss., University of Reading, UK.

Colombatto D, Mould F L, Bhat M K and Owen E. 2002c. The effect of fibrolytic enzyme application on rate and extent of alfalfa stem fermentation, assessed in vitro. Annual Proceedings of British Society of Animal Science. Pp 209.Penicuik, U.K.

Eun J S and Beauchemin K A. 2007. Assessment of the efficacy of varying experimental exogenous fibrolytic enzymes using in vitro fermentation characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 132: 298–15.

Feng P, Hunt C W, Pritchard G T and Julien W E. 1996. Effect of enzyme preparations on in situ and in vitro degradation and in vivo digestive characteristics of mature cool-season grass forage in beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 74: 1349–57.

Ferguson K A, Hemsley J A and Reis P J. 1967. Nutrition and wool growth. The effect of protecting dietary protein from microbial degradation in the rumen. Australian Journal of Science 30: 215–17.

Fredeen A H and McQueen R E. 1993. Effect of enzyme additives on quality of alfalfa/grass silage and dairy cow performance. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 73: 581–91.

Galante Y M, De Conti A and Monteverdi R. 1998. Application of Trichoderma enzymes in food and feed industries. Trichoderma and Gliocladium – Enzymes, biological control and commercial applications. Vol. 2, pp. 327–42. (Eds) Harman G F and Kubicek C P. Taylor and Francis, London.

Grassin C and Fauquembergue P. 1996a. Fruit juices. Industrial Enzymology. 2nd edn, pp. 226. (Eds) Godfrey T and West S. Macmillan, UK.

Grassin C and Fauquembergue P. 1996b. Wine. Industrial enzymology. 2nd edn, pp 374–83. (Eds) Godfrey T and West S. Macmillan, UK.

Gwayumba W and Christensen D A. 1997. The effect of fibrolytic enzymes on protein and carbohydrate degradation fractions in forages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77: 541–42.

Hristov A N, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A and Wuerfel R L. 1996. Effect of a commercial enzyme preparation on barley silage in vitro and in sacco dry matter degradability. Proceedings of Western Section, American Society of Animal Science. Pages 282–84.

Hristov A N, McAllister T A, and Cheng K J. 1998. Stability of exogenous polysaccharide-degrading enzyme in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 76: 161–68.

Iwaasa A D, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A and Eivemark S. 1997. Effect of fibrolytic enzymes in barley-based diets on performance of feedlot cattle and in vitro gas production. Joint Rowett Institutnational De La Recherche Agronomique Rumen Microbiology. Symposium. Aberdeen, Scotland, Poster 39.

Jacobs J L and McAlian A B. 1991. Enzymes as silage additives. Silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle. Grass Forage Science 46: 63–73.

Jafari A, Edriss M A, Alikhani M and Emtiazi G. 2005. Effects of treated wheat straw with exogenous fibre-degrading enzymes on wool characteristics of ewe lambs. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 4: 321–26.

Jafari A, Alikhani M and Edriss M A. 2004. The effects of substituting treated wheat straw with fibrolytic enzymes for alfalfa hay on Naieni replacement ewe lambs performances. Proceedings of the Science of Changing Climates. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Kohn R A and Allen M S. 1992. Storage of fresh and ensiled forages by freezing affects fibre and crude protein fraction. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 58: 215–20.

Krause D O, Denman S E, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae A L, Attwood G T and McSweeney C S. 2003. Opportunities to improve fibre degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiology Review 27: 663–93.

Krause M, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M, Farr B I and Nørgaard P. 1998. Fibrolytic enzyme treatment of barley grain and source of forage in high-grain diets fed to growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 96:1010–15.

Kung L Jr, Treacher R J, Nauman G A, Smagala A M, Endres K M and Cohen M A. 2000. The effect of treating forages with fibrolytic enzymes on its nutritive value and lactation performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 115–122.

Lewis G E, Hunt C W, Sanchez W K, Treacher R, Pritchard G T and Feng P. 1996. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the digestive characteristics of a forage based diet fed to beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 74: 3020–28.

Lewis G E, Sanchez W K, Hunt C W, Guy M A, Pritchard G T, Swanson B I and Treacher R J. 1999. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on the lactational performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 611–17.

Lewis G E, Sanchez W K, Treacher R, Hunt CW and Pritchard GT. 1995. Effect of direct-fed fibrolytic enzymes on lactational performance of mid-lactation Holstein cows. Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science and Western Branch Canadian Society of Animal Science. July 6th– 8h, Lethbridge, AB. 46: 310–13.

McAllister T A, Oosting S J, Popp J D, Mir Z, Yanke L J, Hristov A N, Treacher R J and Cheng K J. 1999. Effect of exogenous enzymes on digestibility of barley silage and growth performance of feedlot cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 79: 353–60.

McAllister T A, Hristov A N, Beauchemin K A, Rode L M and Cheng K J. 2001. Enzymes in ruminant diets. Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition. Pp. 273–98. (Eds) Bedford M R and Partridge G G. CABI Publishing, Marlborough, Wiltshire, UK.

Miller G L. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determinationof reducing sugar. Anals of Chemistry 31: 426– 28.

Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D, Wang Y and Yang W Z. 2001. Resistance of feed enzymes to proteolytic inactivation by rumen microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 79: 1621–30.

Morgavi D P, Beauchemin K A, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, Iwaasa A D, Yang W Z, McAllister T A and Wang Y. 2000a. Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma Longibrachiatum. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1310–21.

Morgavi D P, Newbold C J, Beever D E and Wallace R J. 2000b. Stability and stabilization of potential feed additive enzymes in rumen fluid. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 26:171–77.

Morgavi D P, Nsereko V L, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, McAllister T A and Wang Y. 2000c. A Trichoderma feed enzyme preparation enhances adhesion of Fibrobacter succinogenes to complex substrates but not to pure cellulose. Proc. XXV Conf. Rumen Function. Chicago. Page 31.

Muwalla M M, Haddad S G and Hijazeen M A. 2007. Effect of fibrolytic enzyme inclusion in high concentrate fattening diets on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs. Livestock Science 111: 255–58.

Nakashima Y, Orskov E R, Hotten P M, Ambo K and Takase Y. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. Effect of polysaccharidase enzymes on degradation characteristics of ensiled rice straw. Journal of Animal Production 47: 421–27.

Nsereko V L, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Furtado A F, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D, Yang W Z and Wang Y. 2002. Effect of a fibrolytic enzyme preparation from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on the rumen microbial population of dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 48: 14–20.

Nsereko V L, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A and McAllister T A. 2000. Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology 88:153–70.

Nsereko V l, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi D P, Rode L M, Furtado A F, McAllister T A, Iwaasa A D, Yang W Z and Wang Y. 2002. Effect of fibrolytic enzyme preparation from Trichoderma longibrachiatum on the rumen microbial population of dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 48: 14–20.

Nussio L G, Huber J T, Theurer C B, Nussio C B, Santos J, Tarazon M, Lima-Filho R O, Riggs B, Lamoreaux M and Treacher R J. 1997. Influence of a cellulase/xylanase complex (C/X) on lactational performance of dairy cows fed alfalfa hay (AH) based diets.Journal of Dairy Science 80: 220.

Reis P J and Colebrook WF. 1972. The utilization of abomasal supplements of protein and amino acids by sheep with special reference to wool growth. Australian Journal of Biological Science 25: 1057–71.

Reis P J, Tunks D A and Munro SG. 1992. Effects of abomasal protein and energy supply on wool growth in Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Reseasech 43: 1353–56.

Rode L M, Yang W Z and Beauchemin K A. 1999. Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 2121–26.

Rodriguez J M, Mendoza P, Gonzalezc S S, Robinsond P H, Mendozae G and Lvareza G A. 2007. Effects of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on ruminal fermentation and digestibility of total mixed rations fed to lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 142: 210–19.

Schingoethe D J, Stegeman G A and Treacher R J. 1999. Response of lactating dairy cows to a cellulase and xylanase enzyme mixture applied to forages at the time of feeding. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 996–1003.

Somogyi M. 1952. Notes on sugar determination. Journal of Biological Chemistry 195: 19–23.

Stokes M R and Zheng S. 1995. The use of carbohydrase enzymes as feed additives for early lactation cows. Proceedings of 23rd Conference on Rumen Function. Chicago. Pp 34.

Tricario J M and Dawson K A. 1999. Effects of defined xylanase and cellulase enzyme preparations on digestive processes of rumen microbial cultures. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 252 (Abstr).

Van-Soest P J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

Wang Y, McAllister T A, Rode L M, Beauchemin K A, Morgavi, D P, Nsereko V L, Iwaasa A D and Yang W. 2001. Effects of an exogenous enzyme preparation on microbial protein synthesis, enzyme activity and attachment to feed in the rumen simulation technique (Rustec) British Journal of Nutrition 85: 325–32.

White B A, Mackie R I and Doerner K C. 1993. Enzymatic hydrolysis of forage cell walls. Forage Cell Wall Structure and Digestibility. (Eds) Jung H G, Buxton D R, Hatfield R D and Ralph J. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science of Society America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. Pp 455–84.

Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A and Rode L M. 1999. Effects of enzyme feed additives on extent of digestion and milk production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 391–403.

Yang W Z, Beauchemin K A and Rode L M. 2000. A comparison of methods of adding fibrolytic enzymes to lactating cow diets. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 2512–20.

Zinn R A and Salinas J. 1999. Influence of Fibrozyme on digestive function and growth performance of feedlot steers fed a 78% concentrate growing diet. Proceedings of Alltech 15th Annual Symposium. Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Nottingham University Press, pp. 313–19.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-04-16

Published

2014-04-16

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

CHANDRASEKHARAIAH, M., D, P. K., SANTOSH, S. S., PALANIVEL, C., CHIGURUPATI, S., & PRASAD, C. S. (2014). Role of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes in ruminant feeding. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84(4), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i4.39826
Citation