Anti-microbial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella serovars from man and animals


Abstract views: 118 / PDF downloads: 60

Authors

  • CHANDRA SHEKHAR N. D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad
  • S P SINGH N. D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i4.39832

Keywords:

Animals, Anti-microbial resistance, Man, Molecular characterization, Salmonella serovars

Abstract

Varied samples (1,132) comprising poultry meat (212), poultry eggs (49), poultry droppings (60), autopsied poultry tissues (60), pork (156), pig faeces (189), cattle dung (105), buffalo dung (103), sheep faeces (11), goat faeces (31), deer faeces (2) and human stool (154) were screened for isolation of Salmonella spp. Total 50 Salmonella isolates were recovered from samples, viz. poultry meat (2), poultry eggs (1), poultry droppings (6), autopsied poultry tissues (16), pork (2), pig faeces (9), cattle dung (6), buffalo dung (3), sheep faeces (4) and human stool (1). The recovered Salmonella isolates belonged to 10 different serovars with most prevalent serovar S. Typhimurium (21) followed by S. Weltevreden (12), S. Ughelli (5), S. Essen (3), S. Elisabethville (2), S. Lagos (2), S. Drogana (2), S. Enteritidis (1), S. London (1) and un-typable Salmonella (1). Salmonella isolates showed extreme variation in resistance (0–100%) against anti-microbial agents. The maximum resistance was observed among Salmonella isolates against sulphamethizole and furazolidone (100% each) followed by kanamycin (50%), gentamicin (44%), nalidixic acid (14%), tobramycin (10%), amikacin, ampicillin, streptomycin and tetracycline (8% each), amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid (6%), norfloxacin (4%), ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime (2% each) and chloramphenicol (0%). A high level of sensitivity in Salmonella isolates was observed against chloramphenicol (100%) and tetracycline (92%). A high multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index in a range of 0.133–0.666 was observed in Salmonella serovars. Molecular characterization of Salmonella was performed by targeting amplification of invA gene primer fragment for confirmation of Salmonella spp. in which all isolates were found positive for this gene. Moreover, this gene encodes virulence factor in Salmonella spp. which was exhibited by all Salmonella isolates of the present study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarestrup F M, Lertworapreecha M, Evans M C, Bangtrakulnonth A, Chalermchaikit T, Hendriksen R S and Wegener H C. 2003. Anti-microbial susceptibility and occurrence of resistance genes among Salmonella enterica serovar Weltevreden from different countries. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 52: 715–18.

Andrews W H and Hammack T S. 2003. Salmonella. FDA Bacteriological Analytical Manual. 8th edn. Chapter 5. Rev. A. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, M D.

Bauer A W, Kirby W M M, Sherris J C and Turck M. 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standard single disc method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 45: 493–96.

Carraminana J J, Rota C, Agustin I and Herrera A. 2004. High prevalence of multiple resistance to antibiotics in Salmonella serovars isolated from a poultry slaughterhouse in Spain. Veterinary Microbiology 104: 133–39.

CDC. 1994. Addressing emerging infectious disease threats: a preventions strategy for the United States. MMWR. 43.

CDC/WHO. 2003. Salmonella serovar Typhi. Manual for the laboratory identification of and anti-microbial susceptibility testing of bacterial pathogens of public health importance in the developing world.

Chiu C H and Ou J T. 1996. Rapid identification of Salmonella serovars in faeces by specific detection of virulence genes, invA and spvC by an enrichment broth culture-multiplex PCR combination assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34: 2619– 2622.

CLSI. 2011. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for anti-microbial susceptibility testing; Twenty-First Information Supplement M100- S21 Vol. 31 No. 1, Jan. 2011. CLSI document M100- S21 [ISBN 1–56238-742–1]. CLSI 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1444, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, USA.

Cohen M L and Tauxe R V. 1986. Drug-resistant Salmonella in the United States: an epidemiologic perspective. Science 234: 964–69.

Dupont H L and Steele J H. 1987. Use of anti-microbial agents in animals’ feeds: implications for human health. Review of Infectious Diseases 9: 447–60.

Gautam V, Gupta N K and Chaudhary U. 2002. Sensitivity pattern of Salmonella serotypes in Northern India. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases 6: 281–87.

ISO 6579: 2002(E) 4thedn. Microbiology - General guidance on methods for the detection of Salmonella, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jaulkar A D, Zade N N, Katre D D, Khan D D, Chaudhary S P and Shide S V. 2011. Plasmid characterization of Salmonella isolated from foods of animal origin. Journal of Veterinary Public Health 9 (1): 25–28.

O’Brien T F. 2002. Emergence, spread and environmental effect of anti-microbial resistance: how to use of an anti-microbial anywhere can increase resistance to any microbial anywhere else. Clinical Infectious Diseases 34: 78–84.

Old D C. 1996. Salmonella. Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th edn. Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London New York Philadelphia Sydney Toronto.

Sambrook J and Russell D W. 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

USDA/FSIS (United States Department of Agriculture/Food Safety Inspection Service). 2002. Isolation and identification of Salmonella from meat, poultry and egg products, MLG 4.02, rev. 10/25/02. USDA/FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook, 3rd ed. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety Inspection Service, Washington, D C.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-04-16

Published

2014-04-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SHEKHAR, C., & SINGH, S. P. (2014). Anti-microbial resistance and molecular characterization of Salmonella serovars from man and animals. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84(4), 368–372. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i4.39832
Citation