Effect of dietary supplementation of humic acids on performance of broilers


Abstract views: 205 / PDF downloads: 57

Authors

  • R NAGARAJU Veterinary Dispensary, Sira, Tumkur, Karnataka
  • B S V REDDY Karnataka Veterinary Animal Fisheries Sciences University, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 024 India
  • R GLORIDOSS Karnataka Veterinary Animal Fisheries Sciences University, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 024 India
  • B N SURESH Karnataka Veterinary Animal Fisheries Sciences University, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 024 India
  • C RAMESH Veterinary Dispensary, Kelagur, Chikkamagalur, Karnataka

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i4.39854

Keywords:

Broilers, Growth response, Humic acid, Immunity, Nutrient utilization

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the efficacy of humic acid (HA) based product as a substitute for antibiotic in broilers. Two basal diets, viz. moderate (BIS 1992) and low nutrient density diets (3.5% lesser ME and CP than BIS 1992 specification) were formulated. Low and moderate nutrient density basal diets without antibiotic were served negative controls and with added antibiotic became positive controls. Further, moderate and low nutrient density diets were supplemented with 0.5, 0.75 or 1g HA based product per kg of feed to result in 6 test diets. Each of such diets prepared for starter (0–14 days), grower (15–28 days) and finisher (29–42 days) phases were offered to duplicate groups of 14 chicks each. The results revealed significantly higher body weight gains in moderate density diet with 0.1% HA during starter phase, more feed consumption in low nutrient density diet with 0.075% HA during finisher stage and better feed efficiency in moderate density diet with 0.075% HA. However, the cumulative body weight gain, feed consumption and feed efficiency including net returns were comparable among different treatments during 42–day trial. Metabolizability of dry matter and crude protein was significantly high in groups fed moderate nutrient density diet than low nutrient density diets however, no definite trend was observed with HA supplementation. At the termination of 42–day-trial, no significant differences were observed in dressing percentage, breast-meat yield, abdominal fat pad, relative weights of liver, heart, gizzard, spleen and bursa among different treatments. On 10-day post-vaccination, the ND titer values were statistically similar among different treatments while improved IBD titer values of birds were observed in HA supplanted groups. It was concluded that the addition of HA up to 0.1% particularly in the low nutrient density antibiotic free diets can improve the performance and immune status of broilers without affecting their carcass characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bailey C A, White K E and Donke S L. 1996. Evaluation of Menefee HumateTM on the performance of broilers. Poultry Science 75 (Suppl. 1): 84. (Abstract).

BIS. 1992. Bureau of Indian Standards, Poultry Feed Specifications. 4th Review, Manak Bhavan, New Delhi.

Ceylan N and Ciftci I. 2002. The effects of some alternative feed additives for antibiotic growth promoters on the performance and gut microflora of broiler chicks. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science. 27: 727–33.

Duncan D B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple f test. Biometrics 11: 1–42.

Eren M, Deniz G, Gezen S S and Türkmen I Ì. 2000. Broyler yemlerine katilan humatlarin besi performansi, serum mineral konsantrasyonu ve kemik külüüzerine etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 47: 255–63.

Griban V G, Baranahenko V A, Kasyan S S and Verlos S V. 1991. Use of Hydrohumate (sodium salt of humic acid) for enhancing the natural resistance of cows with subclinical nutritional disorders. Vet Moskova.12: 54–56.

HuminTech. 2004. Huminfeed-Tierfutterzusätze and Veterinär Medizin & Huminsäure Basierende Produkte. Humintech® Humintech GmbH, Heerdter Landstr. 189/D, D-4054 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Lenk V T and Benda A. 1989. Torfpaste-ein huminsaurehaltiges tiergesundheitspflegemittel zur vorbeuge und behandlung von

durchfallerkrankungen der kalber. Monatshefte Vet 44: 563–65. Islam K M S, Schuhmacher A and Gropp J M. 2005. Humic Acid Substances in Animal Agriculture. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 4(3): 126–34.

Kocabagli N, Alp M, Acar N and Kahraman R. 2002. The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield. Poultry Science 81: 227–30.

Kucukersan S, Kucukersan K, Colpan I, Goncuoglu E, Reisli Z and Yesilbag D. 2005. The effects of humic acid on egg production and egg traits of laying hen. Veterinary Medicine - Czech 50 (9): 406–10.

Parks C W. 1998. ‘The use of Menefee HumateTM in typical and low-crude protein diets for turkey toms and in the bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil amended with poultry litter as a co-substrate and nutrient source.’ Master’s Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

Shermer C L, Maciorowski K G, Bailey C A, Byers F M and Ricke S. 1998. Caecal metabolites and microbial populations in chickens consuming diets containing a mined humate compound. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture 77: 479– 86.

Snedecor G W and Cochran, W G. 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th edn. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. Stevenson F J 1994. Humus Chemistry - Genesis, Composition, Reactions. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Teravita T M. 2004. Humates in Poultry and Stock Farming. http://www.teravita.com/Humates/Chapter9.htm.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-04-16

Published

2014-04-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

NAGARAJU, R., REDDY, B. S. V., GLORIDOSS, R., SURESH, B. N., & RAMESH, C. (2014). Effect of dietary supplementation of humic acids on performance of broilers. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84(4), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i4.39854
Citation