Nutritional evaluation of urea molasses multi-nutrient blocks containing agro-industrial wastes in buffaloes
305 / 116
Keywords:
Blood profile, Buffaloes, In-vivo evaluation, Nutrient availability, Rumen metabolites, Tomato pomace, Spent sugar syrup, Urea molasses multinutrient block, Waste breadAbstract
The present study was undertaken to formulate and compare the nutritional worth of conventional urea molasses multinutrient block (UMMB) with UMMB containing spent sugar syrup (SSP) from aamla (Phyllanthus emblica) preserve (murabba) industries, sundried waste bread (WB) and/or tomato pomace (TP) in buffaloes. The wheat flour and oil mustard cake in the conventional UMMB were replaced, respectively, with WB and TP on nitrogen basis, while molasses was replaced by SSS on weight by weight basis. The blocks were iso-nitrogenous and iso- caloric as indicated by comparable CP and EE contents in different UMMBs. Male Murrah buffaloes (12; 5–6 yr old; 456.8±5.3 kg body weight) randomly distributed into 3 equal groups were offered either conventional-UMMB, UMMB containing SSS (SSS-UMMB) or UMMB containing SSS, WB and TP (SSS-WB-TP-UMMB) for 45 days. In addition to the respective UMMBs, the animals in all the groups were offered 1 kg conventional concentrate mixture, 5 kg green fodder and 9 kg wheat straw. The daily intake of block varied from 0.49 kg (SSS-UMMB) to 1.08 kg (conventional-UMMB). Simultaneously, each diet was fed to 3 rumen fistulated male buffaloes to assess the impact on rumen metabolites. The DM and water intake, digestibility of nutrients, concentration of rumen metabolites, blood profile, urinary purine derivatives and N-retention were statistically comparable in all the groups. All the animals maintained their body weights. It was concluded that agro-industrial wastes like spent sugar syrup, waste bread and tomato pomace could be incorporated into UMMBs without any adverse effect on palatability, nutrient utilization or health of animals. Above all the preparation of UMMB could be economized and conventional ingredients could be spared for more vulnerable species.
Downloads
References
Alam M G S, Ul-azam S and Khan J. 2006. Supplementation with urea and molasses and body weight, milk yield and onset of ovarian cyclicity in cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development 52: 529–35.
Amador E and Urban J. 1972. Simplified serum phosphorus analysis by continuous flow UV spectrophotometry. Clinical Chemistry 18: 601–04.
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington.
Bakshi M P S and Wadhwa M. 2011. Nutritional status of dairy animals in different regions of Punjab State in India. Indian Journal of Animal Science 81: 52–58.
Barnett A J G and Reid R L. 1957. Studies on the production of volatile fatty acids from the grass in artificial rumen.1. Volatile fatty acid production from fresh grass. Journal of Agricultural Science 13: 315–21.
Bhargava A. 2008. ‘Study on bread waste as non conventional energy supplement for buffalo calves.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis submitted to Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciencies University, Ludhiana.
Crampton E W and Maynard L A. 1938. The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. Journal of Nutrition 15: 383–95.
Doumas B T, Watson W A and Briggs H G. 1971. Albumin standards and the measurements of serum albumin with bromocresol green. Clinical Chemistry Acta 31: 87–96.
Evans R T. 1968. Technical methods – Manual and automated methods for measuring urea based on a modification of its reaction with diacetyl monoxime and thiosemicarbazide. pp 527–32.
Faftine O L J and Zanetti A M. 2010. Effect of multinutrient block on feed digestibility and performance of goats fed maize stover during the dry season in south of Mozambique. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22: 1–10.
Folin D and Wu H. 1916. A system of blood analysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 38: 81–110.
Gowda N K S, Malathi V, Suganthi R U and Raghvendra A. 2005. Effect of dry heat and sunlight on the aflatoxin content in compounded feed. Indian journal of Animal Nutrition 22: 132– 34.
Henry R J and Dryer R L. 1963. Standard Method of Clinical Chemistry. Vol 4, pp 205. Academic Press, New York.
Henry R J, Canon D C and Winkelman J W. 1974. Clinical Chemistry, Principles and Techniques. 2nd edn. Haper and Row.
IAEA. 1997. Estimation of rumen microbial protein production from purine derivatives in urine. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-TECDOC- 945, Vienna.
Jain N C. 1996. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology. 5th revised edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA.
Kaneko J J. 1997. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. 5th revised edn. Academic Press, Inc., New York, USA. Kravchenko L V, Morozov S V, Beketova N A, Deryagina V P, Avreneva L I and Tutelyan V A. 2003. Antioxidant status of rats receiving lycopene in different doses. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 135: 353–57.
Makkar H P S. 2007. Feed supplementation block technology- past, present and future. Feed Supplementation Blocks. Paper 164 Pp 1–12. (Eds) Makkar H P S, Manuel Sánchez M and Speedy A W. FAO Animal Production and Health.
Mubi A A, Kibon A and Mohammed I D. 2011. Effects of multinutrient blocks supplementation on the performance of grazing Yankasa sheep in the wet season of guinea savanna region of Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 3: 103–06.
NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th revised edn. National Research Council. National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
Robertson J B and Van Soest P J. 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. The Analysis of Dietary Fibre in Food. (Eds) James W P T and Theander O. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 2004. Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publications, New Delhi.
SPSS. 2007. Statistical packages for Social Sciences. Version 16, SPSS Inc., Ilinois, USA.
Toppo S, Verma A K, Dass R S and Mehra U R. 1997. Nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation pattern in crossbred cattle fed different planes of nutrition supplemented with urea molasses mineral block. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64: 101–12.
Trinder P. 1969. Determination of glucose in blood using glucose- oxidase with an alternate oxygen accepter. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 6: 24–27.
Trivedi R C, Rebar L and Berka E. 1978. New enzymatic method for serum uric acid at 500nm. Clinical Chemistry 24: 1908– 10.
Ünal Y, Kaya I and Öncüer A. 2005. Use of urea-molasses mineral blocks in lambs fed with straw. Review Médicine Véterinary. 156: 217–20.
Upreti C R, Shrestha B K and Ghimire B. 2010. Effect of UMMB supplementation during winter on the milk production and its composition and infertility in dairy cattle in hill management production system. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology 11: 71–78.
Wadhwa M and Bakshi M P S. 2011. Urea-molasses-multinutrient blocks/licks: a blend of nutrients for ruminants. ‘Successes and Failures with Animal Nutrition Practices and Technologies in Developing Countries. (Ed.) Makkar H P S. FAO Animal Production and Health Proceedings, Rome, Italy. 35–39.
Young E G and Conway C F. 1942. On the estimation of allantoin by Riminic-Schryver reaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry 142: 839–52.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.