Health performance of crossbred Indian dairy calves reared on whey-based commercial milk replacer
180 / 113
Keywords:
Crossbred calves, Health, Milk replacer, Whole milkAbstract
Newly born crossbred calves (24) of either sex were selected and equally distributed into control, Treatment- 1(T-1) and Treatment-2 (T-2) groups for evaluating the effect of feeding milk replacer on their health performances. Control group received whole milk and skim milk as per the institute feeding schedule, whereas the T-1 and T-2 groups were fed on whole milk and milk replacer, respectively at the constant rate 1/10th of their body weight for first three months of age. The overall average daily gain in T-1 showed significantly higher average daily gain than control and T-2. Health of calves was evaluated in terms of number of calves days in diarrhoea and their fecal consistency scores (FCS). The values of FCS were significantly higher in T-2 than T-1 and control indicating that calves in milk replacer group had higher incidences of diarrhoea than other 2 groups fed on whole milk. No any major health problems or mortality were observed during the study in any of the groups. From the present study it was concluded that in spite of slightly higher incidences of digestive problems in calves during the winter months, milk replacer feeding could be a better option for commercial dairy producers and resource poor farmers in order to save the whole milk for human consumption.
Downloads
References
Arora S P, Bajpai L D and Dave B K. 1973. Raising crossbred and buffalo calves on milk replacer. The Indian Journal of Animal Science 43(6): 462–67.
Bharti P K, Kamboj M L, Tyagi A, Basumatary R, Kumar S and Khan M H. 2011. Economics of feeding milk replacer and whole milk in crossbred calves. Indian Veterinary Journal 88 (10):43–4.
Blome R M, Drackley J K, McKeith F K, Hutjens, M F and McCoy G C. 2003. Growth, nutrient utilization and body composition of dairy calves fed milk replacer containing different amounts of protein. Journal of Animal Science 81: 1641–55.
Corbett R B. 2003. Utilizing milk replacer to maximize early growth rates. Proceedings of Mid- South Ruminant Nutrition Conference Dallas, Texas pp. 65–71.
Fisher L J. 1976. An evaluation of milk replacers based on the growth rate, health and blood chemistry of Holstein calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 56: 257.
Godden S M, Fetrow J P, Feirtag J M, Green L R and Wells S J. 2005. Economic analysis of feeding pasteurized non-saleable milk versus conventional milk replacer to dairy calves. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 226:1547–54.
Green R. 1996. Milk versus milk replacers. Michigan dairy review 1(2).
Hill T M, Aldrich J M, Schlotterbeck, R L and Bateman H G. 2007. Amino acids, fatty acids, and fat sources for calf milk replacers. The professional Animal Scientist 23:401–08.
Huuskonen A, Khalili H, Joki T E and Nousiainen J. 2005. Effects of vegetable fats versus lard in milk replacers on feed intake, digestibility and growth in Finnish Ayrshire bull calves. Journal of Dairy Science 88: 3575–81.
Jaster E H, McCoy G C and Fernando R L. 1990. Dietary fat in milk or milk replacers for dairy calves raised in hutches during the winter. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 1843–50.
Larson L L, Owen F G, Albright J L, Appleman R D Lamb R C and Muller L D. 1977.Guidelines toward more uniformity in measuring and reporting calf experimental data. Journal of Dairy Science 60: 989.
Lynch G P, Pike T L and Bond James. 1978. Nutritional responses of calves fed milk or a milk replacer. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 212–20.
Quigley J D, Wolfe T A and Elsasser T H. 2006. Effects of additional milk replacer feeding on calf health, growth, and selected blood metabolites in calves. Journal of Dairy Science 89 (1):207–16.
Sastry N S R and Thomas C K. 2005. Dairy Bovine Production. Textbook. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi- Ludhiana.
Silva A G and Huber J T. 1986. Influence of substituting two types of soybean protein for milk protein on gain and utilization of milk replacer in calves. Journal of Dairy Science 69: 172– 80.
Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 6th edn. Lowa state University. Press, Ames.
Stiles R P, Grieve D G, Butler DG and Willoughby RA. 1974. Effects of fluid intake level and dry matter concentration on the incidence of scours in milk replacer-fed calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Sciences 54: 73–77.
Terosky T L, Heinrichs A J and Wilson L L. 1997. A comparison of milk protein sources in diets of calves up to eight weeks of age. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 2977–83.
Timmerman H M, Mulder L, Everts H, Van Espan D C, Van Der Wal E, Klaassen G, Rouwers S M G, Hartemink R, Rombouts F M and Beynen A C. 2005. Health and growth of veal calves fed milk replacers with or without probiotics. Journal of Dairy Science 88: 2154–65.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.