Risk perceptions and risk management strategies of insured and non-insured dairy farmers: A comparative study


Abstract views: 205 / PDF downloads: 126

Authors

  • MOHD AMEER KHAN College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora, Durg
  • MAHESH CHANDER Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • D BARDHAN Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84.i6.41654

Keywords:

Dairy farmers, Insurance, Risk management, Risk perception

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the farmers’ perceptions of risk and risk management among the farmers who had insured and non-insured their dairy animals. The data originated from a questionnaire survey of insured (120) and non-insured (120) dairy farmers in Gorakhpur district of Uttar Pradesh. Farmers’ Socio-economic characteristics, risk perceptions and risk management strategies were documented. The average land holding, educational status and dairy farm experience of insured respondents was slightly larger than that of the non-insured dairy farmers. Epidemic livestock diseases, climate risk, marketing/sales risk, feed cost variability, Poor conception and delay in treatment/AI emerged as relevant sources of risk to the dairy farmers. The most relevant risk management strategy for the dairy farmers were vaccination of animals, having own agricultural land, having financial reserve, life insurance, livestock insurance and off farm employment. The intensity and domination of risk and risk management tool adopted by dairy farmers varied due to their personal perceptions of risk, socio-economic status of that farmer, farm type and institutional arrangements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahsan D A. 2011. Farmers’ motivation, risk perception and risk management strategies in developing economy: Bangladesh experience. Journal of Risk Research 14 (3): 325–49.

Ahsan D A and Roth E. 2010. Farmers’ perceived risks and risk management strategies in emerging mussels aquaculture industry in Denmark. Marine Resource Economics 25 (3): 309–23.

Bardhan D and Tewari S K. 2007. Risk attitude and risk management strategies: An analysis of dairy farmers in Tarai area of Uttaranchal. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 (4): 607–22.

Bihan V E, Pardo S and Guillotreau P. 2013. Risk Perception and Risk Management Strategies of Oyster Farmers. Marine Resource Economics 28 (3): 285–304.

Chaudhary J K, Singh B, Prasad S and Verma M R. 2013. Analysis of morbidity and mortality rates in bovines in Himachal Pradesh. Veterinary World 6 (9): 614–19.

Hardaker J B, Huirne R B M, Anderson J R and Lien G. 2004. Coping with Risk in Agriculture. 2nd edn, CAB Publishing, London, UK.

Kumar G, Joshi P K, Datta K K and Singh S B. 2008. An assessment of economics losses due to Avian flu in Manipur state. Agricultural Economics Research Review 21 (1): 37–47.

Mahajan S, Agarwal R, Kumar M, Mohan A and Pande N. 2013. Incidence of Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in nomadic sheep and goat of Jammu region. Veterinary World 6 (7): 384– 87.

Meuwissen M P M, Huirne R B M and Hardaker J B. 2001. Risk and risk management: an empirical analysis of Dutch livestock farmers. Livestock Production Science 69 (1): 43–53.

Pritchett J, Thilmany T and Johnson K. 2005. Animal Disease economic impact: A survey of literature and typology of research approaches. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 8 (1): 23–45.

Roslan N A, Abdullah A M, Ismail M M and Radam A. 2012. Determining risk attitudes of paddy farmers in KETARA Granary, Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 2 (3): 225–31.

Singh B, Prasad S, Sinha D K and Verma M R. 2013. Estimation of economic losses due to Foot and Mouth Disease in India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83 (9): 964–70.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-06-23

Published

2014-07-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KHAN, M. A., CHANDER, M., & BARDHAN, D. (2014). Risk perceptions and risk management strategies of insured and non-insured dairy farmers: A comparative study. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84(6), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84.i6.41654
Citation