Perceived constraints and suggestions in adoption of goat husbandry technologies: A study in semi-arid zone of Uttar Pradesh


292 / 212

Authors

  • VIJAY KUMAR Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom
  • B P SINGH Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 Indian
  • TRIVENI DUTT Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 Indian
  • RAJESH KUMAR College of Veterinary, JAU, Junagadh, Gujarat
  • MAOUSAMI MAOUSAMI Indian Veterinary Research Institute,Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 Indian

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i8.43283

Keywords:

Constraints, Goat husbandry technologies, Goat rearing

Abstract

Present study was conducted in semi-arid zone of Uttar Pradesh under Mainpuri and Firozabad districts among 240 goat farmers and 30 experts to study the constraints restrict the adoption of improved technologies leading to productivity losses of animals. Availability of input was considered as one of the most important constraints. Poor veterinary infrastructure and services, availability of quality buck, poor extension activity were the most serious input constraint. High cost of veterinary service, shrinkage of grazing land and lack of credit facility were the most important economical constraints. Poor knowledge about improved technology, lower literacy rate and ignorance among farmers were most important socio-personal constraints. All the experts suggested to increase the number of veterinary hospital and number of veterinary staff to provide better health service. Majority of experts suggested the provision of quality buck at village level, increasing extension staff in line department, use of mobile phone SMS service, timely availability of vaccine in veterinary hospitals, increasing number of training by the institution, protecting the common property of village for grazing and sensitizing bank staff to provide loan to poor goat farmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barua S, Vaid R K, Kumar A and Vihan V S. 2006. Role of veterinary service in commercial goat farming. Proceedings of National workshop-cum-seminar on commercial goat and sheep farming and marketing: farmer-industry-research interface. pp.231–32. 4–5 March 2006. Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh.

Berhanu B. 2002. ‘Analysis of factors affecting the adoption of crossbred dairy cows in the central highlands of Ethiopia.’ M.Sc. Thesis, School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University.

Chander M. and Rathod P K. 2013. Investment in livestock extension activities by State Departments of Animal Husbandry (SDAH) in India: An appraisal. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83 (2): 185–89.

Chilot Y, Shampiro B I, and Mulat D. 1996. Factors influencing adoption of new technologies in Wolmera and Addis Alem Areas of Ethiopia. Journal of Ethiopian Agricultural economics 1: 63–83.

CIRG. 2013. Annual Report. Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Dist- Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Devendra C and McLeroy G B. 1982. Goat and sheep production in the Tropics. Intermediate Tropical Agricultural Series. Longman, London/New York, p. 271.

FAO.2013. FAOSTAT-2013.

Gujar M L and Pathodiya O P. 2008. Constraints perceived by farmers in goat rearing in Mewar region of southern Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 78 (1): 124–26.

Kumar S and Singh N.P. 2006. Status and prospects of commercial goat farming in India. Proceedings of National workshop-cum- seminar on commercial goat and sheep farming and marketing: farmer-industry-research interface. pp.35–45. 4– 5 March 2006. Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh.

Kumar R. 2012. ‘Adoption and sustanibility of goat heath technologies among farmers in different agro-climatic zones of Bihar’. Ph.D. Thesis, IVRI, Izatnagar, India.

Kumar S. 2007. Agricultural Economics Research Review 20: 503–20.

Kumar S and Upadhyay A D. 2006. Marketing of goats in semi- arid region of Uttar Pradesh. Proceedings of National workshop-cum-seminar on commercial goat and sheep farming and marketing: farmer-industry-research interface. pp.224– 26. 4–5 March 2006. Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Uttar Pradesh.

Livestock Census. 2007. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture.Government of India.

Meena L R and Mann J S. 2006. Adopt fodder production technologies for commercial sheep and goat farming. Proceedings of National Workshop-Cum-Seminar on Commercial Goat And Sheep Farming and Marketing: Farmer-Industry-Research Interface. pp.226–27. 4–5 March 2006. Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh.

Mohan Braj, Sagar R L and Singh K. 2009. Factors Related to Promotion of Scientific Goat Farming. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 9 (3): 47–50.

Sagar R L and Ojha S N. 1998. Goat farmers’ perception of the constraints and factors helping in organizing a Goat Co- operative Society. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 4 (1): 73–78.

Sawal R K and Yadav S B S. 2006. Marketing and economics of small ruminants for meat in Bikaner. Proceedings of National workshop-cum-seminar on commercial goat and sheep farming and marketing: farmer-industry-research interface. pp.227–29. 4–5 March 2006. Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh.

Singh M K and Rai B. 2006. Effect of non-genetic factors on reoroduction traits in Jamunapari goats under semi- intensive management. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 9: 112–15. Singhal, V. 1999. Indian Agricultur. pp.479–516. Indian Economic Data Research Center, New Delhi.

Suresh A, Gupta D C and Mann J S. 2008.Constraints in adoption of improved management practices of sheep farming in semi- arid region of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 14 (1): 93–98.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-08-14

Published

2014-08-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, V., SINGH, B. P., DUTT, T., KUMAR, R., & MAOUSAMI, M. (2014). Perceived constraints and suggestions in adoption of goat husbandry technologies: A study in semi-arid zone of Uttar Pradesh. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84(8), 897–902. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i8.43283
Citation