A comparative study of cryodamages of boar spermatozoa frozen with conventional liquid nitrogen vapour freezing method

S K BAISHYA; R K BISWAS; G KADIRVEL; B C DEKA; SURESH KUMAR; D R THAKURIA

doi:10.56093/ijans.v84i9.43519

Authors

S K BAISHYA KVK, ICAR RC, Umiam
R K BISWAS ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Umroi Road, Meghalaya 793 103 India
G KADIRVEL ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Umroi Road, Meghalaya 793 103 India
B C DEKA AAU, Khanapara, Asom
SURESH KUMAR ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Umroi Road, Meghalaya 793 103 India
D R THAKURIA JNV, Doley Gaon, Morigaon, Asom

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i9.43519

Keywords:

Boar spermatozoa, Conventional freezing, Cryodamage, Cryopreservation

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to quantify the various cryodamages that boar spermatozoa undergo following freezing with conventional liquid nitrogen vapour freezing method. Sperm-rich fractions of ejaculates (15) collected from 6 boars were utilized for the study. The sperm parameters included for investigating the cryodamages were motile spermatozoa, live spermatozoa, live intact acrosome, plasma membrane intact spermatozoa, HOST-reacted spermatozoa, live spermatozoa with high mitochondrial membrane potential, lipid peroxidised spermatozoa and DNA-damaged spermatozoa. The results showed that the process of freezing significantly decreased per cent motile spermatozoa, live spermatozoa, live intact acrosome, plasma membrane intact spermatozoa, HOST- reacted spermatozoa and mitochondrial membrane potential of live sperm population, while increased per cent lipid peroxidised spermatozoa and DNA-damaged spermatozoa. The extent of cryodamage recorded in respect of motile spermatozoa, live spermatozoa, live intact acrosome, plasma membrane intact spermatozoa, HOST-reacted spermatozoa, live spermatozoa with high mitochondrial membrane potential obtained after freezing was 40.33, 34.87, 35.02, 39.48, 39.17 and 6.72 % respectively. The level of cryodamage in the form of lipid peroxidised spermatozoa and DNA-damaged spermatozoa were 8.00 and 3.06 % respectively. In conclusion, the detrimental effect of cryodamage associated with conventional liquid nitrogen vapour freezing was more pronounced on sperm motility, viability, acrosome integrity and plasma membrane integrity than on sperm mitochondrial membrane potential and membrane lipid, while its effect was minimal on sperm DNA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Aitken R J, Wingate J K, Iuliis G N De and Mclaughlin A E. 2007. Analysis of lipid peroxidation in human spermatozoa using BODIPY C11. Molecular Human Reproduction 13 (4): 203–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gal119

2. Beatty R A. 1957. Nigrosin-Eosin staining of rabbit spermatozoa and the fertility of semen. Proceeding of Royal Society, Edinburg 67: 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080455X00000631

3. Chanapiwat P, Kaeoket K and Tummaruk P. 2010. The sperm DNA damage after cryopreservation of boar semen in relation to post-thawed semen qualities, antioxidant commercial settings. Reproduction in Domestic Animal 31: 175–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56808/2985-1130.2223

4. Cossarizza A, Baccarani-Contri M, Kalashnikova G and Franceschi C. 1993. A new method for the cytofluorimetric analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential using the J- aggregate forming lipophilic cation 5, 52 , 6, 62 -tetrachloro–1, 12 , 3, 32 tetraethyl benzimidazol carbocyanine iodide (JC- 1). Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication 197: 40–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1993.2438

5. Cremades T, Roca J, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Abaigar T, Vazquez J M and Martinez E A. 2005. Kinematic changes during the cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa. Journal of Andrology 26 (5): 610–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.05028

6. Guthrie H D and Welch G R. 2006. Determination of intracellular reactive oxygen species and high mitochondrial membrane potential in Percoll-treated viable boar sperm using fluorescence-activated flow cytometry. Journal of Animal Science 84: 2089–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-766

7. Guthrie H D and Welch G R. 2007. Use of fluorescence-activated flow cytometry to determine membrane lipid peroxidation during hypothermic liquid storage and freeze-thawing of viable boar sperm loaded with C11-BODIPY 581/591. Journal of Animal Science 85: 1402–11.

8. Hammerstedt R H, Graham J K and Nolan J P. 1990. Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: What we ask them to survive. Journal of Andrology 11: 73–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1990.tb01583.x

9. Hernandez M, Roca J, Gil M A, Vazquez J M and Martinez E A. 2007. Adjustments on the cryopreservation conditions reduce the incidence of boar ejaculates with poor sperm freezability. Theriogenology 67: 1436–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.02.012

10. Hu H J, Li Q W, Jiang Z L and Li W Y. 2008. Effects of different extenders on DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following freezing-thawing. Cryobiology 57: 257–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.09.004

11. Jeyendran R S, Van der Ven H H, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo B G and Zaneveld L J D. 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 70: 219–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219

12. Kaeoket K K, Tantiparinyakul, Kladkaew W, Chanapiwat P and Techakumphu M. 2008. Effect of different antioxidants on quality of cryopreserved boar semen in different breeds. Thai Journal of Agricultural Sciences 41(1–2): 1–9.

13. Kim S, Lee Y J and Kim Y J. 2011. Changes in sperm membrane and ROS following cryopreservation of liquid boar semen stored at 15°C. Animal Reproduction Science 124: 118–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.01.014

14. Ortman K and Rodriguez-Martinez H. 1994. Membrane damage during dilution, cooling and freezing-thawing of boar spermatozoa packaged in plastic bags. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 41(1): 37–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1994.tb00063.x

15. Tamuli M K and Watson P F. 1994. Use of a simple staining technique to distinguish acrosomal changes in the live sperm sub-population. Animal Reproduction Science 35: 247–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(94)90040-X

16. Thuwanut P, Chatdarong K, Techakumphu M and Axner E. 2008. The effect of antioxidants on motility, viability, acrosome integrity and DNA integrity of frozen-thawed epididymal cat spermatozoa. Theriogenology 70: 233–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.005

17. Waterhouse K E, Hofmo P O, Tverda A and Miller R R. 2006. Within and between breed differences in freezing tolerance and plasma membrane fatty acid composition of boar sperm. Reproduction 131: 887–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.01049

18. Westendorf P, Richter L and Treu H.1975. Zur Tiefgefrierung von Ebersperma. Labor-und Besamungsergebnisse mit dem Hiilsenberger Pailletten-verfahren. Dtsch Tierarztl Wschr 82: 261–67.