Technology is essential but not sufficient for its adoption evidence from fodder Innovation Project


Abstract views: 316 / PDF downloads: 122

Authors

  • S V N RAO Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, Puducherry 605 009 India
  • K NATCHIMUTHU Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, Puducherry 605 009 India
  • S RAMKUMAR Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, Puducherry 605 009 India
  • V RASHEED SULAIMAN Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, Puducherry 605 009 India
  • RANJITHA PUSKUR Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Veterinary Education and Research, Puducherry 605 009 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i11.44793

Keywords:

Adoption, Evidence, Fodder Innovation Project, Technology

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to better understand how various social and policy issues constrain the adoption of innovations among dairy farmers and presents the observations of the relationship between the adoption of green fodder feeding to dairy cattle and marketing of milk in Puducherry. Though there are some isolated successes of promoting fodder entrepreneurs by the development departments in Puducherry, these approaches could not be sustained due to lack of complementary or supportive institutional arrangements. Adoption of an innovation (fodder transaction) is more constrained by social, economic and policy issues, which include transportation of fodder, relations between the fodder growers, buyers, secretary, Milk Cooperative Society, leaders of Women Self Help Groups, government policy on milk pricing, urbanization and, industrialization, rather than technological issues. The insights offered in this paper could be useful in the design of policies to address complex economic and social issues associated with fodder usage by the dairy farmers in general and landless dairy farmers in particular.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Athilakshmy S, Sunitha P and Rao S V N 2011. Temporal changes in the dairy farming scenario in Puducherry. Paper presented in national seminar on ‘Innovations in Farming Systems Research and Extension for Inclusive Development’. TANUVAS, Chennai.

Del Castello, Ricccardo and Braun Paul Mathias. 2006. Effective Rural Communication for Development. FAO and GTZ, Rome.

Feder Gershon, Just Richard E and Zilberman David. 1985. Adoption of Agricultural innovations in developing countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 255–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/451461

Government of Puducherry. 2009. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Pondicherry.

Government of Puducherry. 2011. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Pondicherry.

Hall A J, Rasheed Sulaiman V and Peter Bezkorowajnyj. 2007. Reframing Technical Change: Livestock Fodder Scarcity Revisited as Innovation Capacity Scarcity- A Conceptual Framework. FIP Conceptual Framework. International Livestock Research Institute http://www.crispindia.org/docs/FIPConceptual_Framework.pdf

Kemmis Stephen and McTaggart Robin.1988. The Action Research Planner. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.

Natchimuthu K 2002. ‘Socio-economic and technological impact of animal husbandry programme in Pondicherry.’ Ph.D. thesis, NDRI, Karnal.

Natchimuthu K, Ramkumar S and Rao S V N. 2005. Constraints and Challenges of Dairy Development: Field Evidence of Pondicherry. Journal of Rural Development 24 (4) 501–20.

Pondicherry Vision. 2020. Madras School of Economics, Chennai. http://Puducherry.gov.in/publication/v2020.

PONLAIT 2011. Annual Report 2010–11. The Pondicherry Cooperative Milk Producers’ Union Limited, Puducherry.

Ramkumar, S, Rao, S V N, Garforth, C and Ganesan R 2003. Cattle rearing by landless in the periurban regions of Pondicherry. Cattle Health Issues in Peri-Urban Regions: Potentials of Information in Coping with Poverty. (Eds) Rao S V N and Ramkumar S. 2003. Proceedings of the workshop held on 20 and 21 March, 2003 at RAGACOVAS, Pondicherry.

Rao, S V N, Kherde R L and Tyagi K C. 1992. Why delay in farmer’s adoption of dairy technologies. Indian Dairyman 44: 288 –301.

Rao S V N, Natchimuthu K and Ramkumar S. 2009. Milk Producers pay for all. Indian Dairyman July 2009: 61–66.

Rao S V N, Patil B R, Rangnekar D V, Dey R A and Van Den Ban A W. 1995. Farmers’ perceptions of innovations. Handbook for Straw Feeding Systems – Principles and Applications with Emphasis on Indian Livestock Production. (Eds) Singh Kiran and Schiere J B . Indo Dutch Project on Bio conversion of Crop Residues, ICAR, New Delhi and DTAP, Agricultural University, The Netherlands.

Rao, S V N, Ramkumar, S, Natchimuthu, K and Peter Bezkorowajnyj. 2009. Dairy cattle feeding – evidence based pro-poor institutional approach. Proceedings of the Animal Nutrition World Conference 2009. Vol II, Lead Papers, pp 157– 62.

Rasheed Sulaiman V. 2012. Agricultural extension in India: current status and ways forward. Roundtable Consultation on Agricultural Extension. 15–17 March 2012. Beijing.

Rasheed Sulaiman V and Hall J Andy. 2006. Extension Policy Analysis in Asian Nations. Changing roles of Agricultural Extension in Asian Nations. (Eds) van den Ban A W and Samanta R K. BR publishing Corporation, Delhi.

Rasheed Sulaiman V, Andy Hall, Vamsidhar Reddy, T S and Kumuda Dorai. 2010. Studying rural innovation management: a framework and early findings from RIU in south Asia, Discussion paper Series 11, RIU.

Rezvanfar A. 2007. Communication and socio-personal factors influencing adoption of dairy farming technologies amongst livestock farmers. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 19, Article #33. Retrieved April 6, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/3/rezv19033.htm

Rogers E M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations.5th edn, Free Press, New York.

Sastry N S R, Reddy D P R and Hermon R R 1993. Planning for development of Animal Husbandry sector: a study in Pondicherry. NIRD and Booklinks Corporation, Hyderabad.

Singh Kiran and Schiere J B. 1995. Handbook for Straw Feeding Systems – Principles and Applications with Emphasis on Indian Livestock Production. (Eds). Indo Dutch Project on Bio conversion of Crop Residues, ICAR, New Delhi and DTAP, Agricultural University, The Netherlands.

The Economic Times. 2007. NREGA may be Adversely Affecting Agriculture in Economy. Aug 19, 2007.

Tamizhkumaran J, Rao S V N and Natchimuthu K. 2012. Prospects of livestock rearing in Puducherry. Proceedings on Kerala Veterinary Science Congress. 10th and 11th Nov 2012. Pp.165– 175.

Van den Ban A W and Hawkins H S. 1996. Agricultural Extension. 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, London.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-11-17

Published

2014-11-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RAO, S. V. N., NATCHIMUTHU, K., RAMKUMAR, S., SULAIMAN, V. R., & PUSKUR, R. (2014). Technology is essential but not sufficient for its adoption evidence from fodder Innovation Project. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84(11), 1228–1235. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i11.44793
Citation