Fenugreek residue as nutraceutical and antibacterial agent in broiler ration


364 / 90

Authors

  • M R PURUSHOTHAMAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India
  • D CHANDRASEKARAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India
  • S R JANANI Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i12.45387

Keywords:

Bacterial count, Blood glucose, Broiler performance, Fenugreek residue, Muscle cholesterol

Abstract

A study was conducted in broiler chicken for 6 weeks to find out the efficacy of fenugreek residue (FR) as an additive in poultry rations and to evaluate the nutraceutical property of FR as a replacement of antibiotic (AB) in broiler rations. Day-old broiler chicks (216) were divided into 9 treatment groups, each treatment group had 3 replicates with 8 birds in each replicate. The treatments were 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 % FR with and without antibiotic (500 g of 10% oxytetracycline/tonne). At the end of 6 weeks (0 – 42 day), the body weight gain was comparable with the control, whereas significantly higher feed intake and poor FCR was found in 1.0% and 1.5% FR without AB group than the control. Slaughter studies with 6 birds/treatment group were conducted at the end of the experiment revealed that dressing %, giblet and abdominal fat (g/kg body weight) did not vary among the groups. The blood glucose was not influenced and muscle cholesterol levels reduced in all treatment groups than the control. The intestinal bacterial Escherichia coli and Clostridium spp. count was found to be reduced in FR without AB, however FR with AB fed birds have intestinal Clostridium content comparable (0.5 and 2.0% FR) or higher (1.0 and 1.5% FR) than the control. Inclusion of FR with AB provided better returns over that of control. Supplementation of FR up to 2% with or without AB (except 1.5% FR without AB) in feed improved the performance of birds and reduced the feed cost per unit gain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abaza I M. 2007. Effects of using fenugreek, chamomile and radish as feed additives on productive performance and digestibility coefficients of laying hens. Egyptian Journal of Poultry Science 27: 199–18.

Abbas R J. 2010. Effect of using fenugreek, parsley and sweet basil seeds as feed additives on the performance of broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 9: 278– 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.278.282

Ahmadiani A, Javan M, Semnanian S, Barat E and Kamalinejad M. 2001. Anti-inflammatory and antipyretic effects of Trigonella foenum-graecum leave extracts in the rat. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 75: 283–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00187-8

AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 15th edn.Washington. D.C.

Aygun A, Dag B and Acar R. 2011. The effects of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L.) seeds on the performance and some carcass traits of quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) chicks. Animal Science 54: 115–20.

Bash E, Ulbricht, C, Kuo G, Szapary P and Smith M. 2003. Therapeutic applications of fenugreek. Alternative Medicine Review 8: 20–27.

Dash B K, Sultana S and Sultana N. 2011. Antibacterial activities of methanol and acetone extracts of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum) and coriander (Coriandrum sativum). Life Sciences and Medicine Research 27: 1–8.

Duncan D B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple ‘F’ test. Biometrics 11: 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Erdogrul O T. 2002. Antibacterial activities of some plant extracts used in folk medicine. Pharmaceutical Biology 40: 269–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.40.4.269.8474

Farman Ullah K, Durrani F R, Asad Sultan, Rifat Ullah Khan and Shabana Naz. 2009. Effect of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum- graecum) seed extract on visceral organs of broiler chicks. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 4 (1): 58–60.

Folch J, Lees M and Solane-Stanley G.H. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226: 497–509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5

Henandez F, Mardrid J, Garcia V, Orengo J and Megias M D. 2004. Influence of two hens. Egyptian Journal of Poultry Science 27: 1207–21.

Khan F U, Durrani F R, Sultan A, Khan R U and Naz S. 2009. Effect of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seed extract on visceral organs of broiler chicks. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 4: 58–60.

Mathur P and Choudhry M. 2009. Effect of domestic processing on proximate composition of fenugreek seeds. Journal of Food Science and Technology 46: 255–58.

Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 2010. Effect of fenugreek and fennel seeds on growth performance and reducing the population of gut microflora in broiler chicks. Animal Science 23: 43–48.

Safaa H M. 2007. Effect of dietary garlic or fenugreek on cholesterol metabolism in laying hens. Egyptian Journal of Poultry Science 27: 1207–1221.

Shalash S M and Azouz H M. 2002. Response of broiler performance to diets containing hot pepper, and/or fenugreek at different metabolizable energy levels. Egyptian Journal of Poultry Science 22: 387–06.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th edn, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.

Windisch W, Schedle K, Plitzner C and Kroismayr L. 2008. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. Journal of Animal Science 86: 140–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0459

Wybenga D R, Pileggi P H, Dirstine J and Giorgio J D. 1970. Direct manual determination of serum total cholesterol with a single stable reagent. Clinical Chemistry 16: 980–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/16.12.980

Downloads

Submitted

2014-12-19

Published

2014-12-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PURUSHOTHAMAN, M. R., CHANDRASEKARAN, D., & JANANI, S. R. (2014). Fenugreek residue as nutraceutical and antibacterial agent in broiler ration. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84(12), 1295–1299. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i12.45387
Citation