Status of milk quality at farmers field


342 / 176

Authors

  • VIKRAM SINGH ICAR, PUSA, New Delhi
  • JANCY GUPTA ICAR, PUSA, New Delhi.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i12.45391

Keywords:

Clean milk production, CMP, Dairy Dock, DCS, MBRT, Milk quality, Milk Producer, Processing Plant

Abstract

The study was conducted on the clean milk production (CMP), to analyze the milk quality from producer to processing plant in cooperative system. To fulfill the objectives, a plan of work was prepared; under which 4 milk unions of Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation (RCDF) were selected, viz. Alwar, Bhilwara, Bikaner and Hanumangarh. To analyze the milk quality, samples were collected from 3 levels of milk collection, viz. pail (farmer), Dairy Cooperative Society (DCS) and dock (district level) in cooperative system and tested at respective unions’ laboratory. The study revealed that as per ISO standards milk unions stands at ‘Very Good’ at pail, ‘Good’ at DCS and ‘Fair’ at dock level, respectively. Lack of incentives on CMP was perceived as very serious constraint by all the farmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aaglave P P and Wadatkar C M. 2012. Microbial examination of milk sample from Nagpur region with reference to coliform. Food Science and Technology Letters 3(1): 24–26.

Das S. 2003. ‘A multivariate analysis of dairy farming practices among rehabilitated and nomadic Van Gujjars in Haridwar, Uttaranchal.’ Ph.D. Thesis, NDRI Deemed University, Karnal (Haryana), India.

FAO. 2008. Milk Hygiene. Milking, Milk Production Hygiene and Udder Health. FAO Animal Production and Health Papers–78, FAO Corporate Document Repository 1–7 pp.

Gupta J. 2003. Clean Milk Production. e-book published by NDRI, Karnal, Haryana.

Hysen B, Stefan B, Skender M, Ardita J and Urs Z. 2011. Survey on raw milk quality in Kosovo. Food and Nutrition Sciences 2: 414–21. Published Online July 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/fns). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2011.25058

Jayarao B. 2005. Bulk Tank Milk Analysis: A tool for improving milk quality. Extension Veterinarian. Department of Veterinary Sciences Pennsylvania State University.

Kandpal S D, Srivastava A K and Negi K S. 2012. Estimation of quality of raw milk (open and branded) by milk adulteration testing kit. Indian Journal of Community Health 24(3): 188– 92.

Maity M. 1999. ‘Study of adoption of clean milk production and health care practices among dairy farm women in south 24– parganas district of West Bengal.’ M.Sc. Thesis, NDRI Deemed University, Karnal.

Muhammad K, Altaf I, Hanif A, Anjum A A and Tipu M Y. 2009. Monitoring of hygienic status of raw milk marketed in Lahore city, Pakistan. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 19 (2): 74–77.

Sarangi A. 2006. ‘Knowledge management for improving CMP practices among landless dairy women of Haryana through interactive multimedia.’ Ph.D. Thesis, NDRI Deemed University, Karnal, Haryana.

Downloads

Submitted

2014-12-19

Published

2014-12-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SINGH, V., & GUPTA, J. (2014). Status of milk quality at farmers field. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 84(12), 1304–1308. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v84i12.45391
Citation