Dietary organic zinc and selenium supplementation improves semen quality and fertility in layer breeders

Authors

  • M SHANMUGAM Scientist, Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 030 India
  • B PRAKASH Scientist, Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 030 India
  • E PRADEEP KUMAR REDDY SRF, Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 030 India
  • A K PANDA Principal Scientist, Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i2.46617

Keywords:

Fertility, Organic selenium, Organic zinc, Semen

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burrows W H and Quinn J P. 1937. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poultry Science 16: 19– 24.

Campbell R G, Hancock J L and Rothschild L. 1953. Counting live and dead bull spermatozoa. Journal of Experimental Biology 30: 44–49.

Chaudhuri D and Lake P E. 1988. A new diluent and methods of holding semen for up to 17 hours at high temperature. Proceedings of 18th World’s Poultry Congress. pp 591–593. (Nagoya, Japan)

Ebeid T A. 2009. Organic selenium enhances the antioxidative status and quality of cockerel semen under high ambient temperature. British Poultry Science 50: 641–47.

Edens F W and Sefton A E. 2009. Sel-Plex® improves spermatozoa morphology in broiler breeder males. International Journal of Poultry Science 8: 853–61.

Hazary R C, Chaudhuri D and Wishart G J. 2001. Application of an MTT reduction assay for assessing sperm quality and predicting fertilising ability of domestic fowl semen. British Poultry Science 42: 115–17.

Hsieh Y Y, Chang C C and Lin C S. 2006. Seminal malondialdehyde concentration but not glutathione peroxidase activity is negatively correlated with seminal concentration and motility. International Journal of Biological Science 2: 23–29.

Maysa M H, El-Sheikh A M H and Abdalla E A. 2009. The effect of organic selenium supplementation on productive and physiological performance in a local strain of chicken. 1-The effect of organic selenium (sel-plex™) on productive, reproductive and physiological traits of Bandarah local strain. Egypt. Poultry Science 29: 1061–84.

McDaniel G R and Craig J V. 1959. Behavior traits, semen measurements and fertility of White Leghorn males. Poultry Science 38: 1005–14.

Rao S V R, Prakash B, Kumari K, Raju M V L N and Panda A K. 2013. Effect of supplementing different concentrations of organic trace minerals on performance, antioxidant activity, and bone mineralization in Vanaraja chickens developed for free range farming. Tropical Animal Health and Production 45:1447–51.

SAS Institute.2008. SAS/STAT 9.2 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Shanmugam M, Prakash B and Panda A K. 2014. Effect of dietary organic zinc supplementation on semen quality in Dahlem Red roosters. Proceedings of Global Animal Nutrition Conference, Bengaluru (India), April 20–22. pp.234.

S³owiñska M, Jankowski J, Dietrich G J, Karol H, Liszewska E, Glogowski J, Koz³owski K, Sartowska K and Ciereszko A. 2011. Effect of organic and inorganic forms of selenium in diets on turkey semen quality. Poultry Science 90:181–90.

Suchý P, Straková E, Illek J and Simon M. 1998. Effect of applications of various forms of zinc on gonad development in breeding cocks. Czech Journal of Animal Science 43: 343– 48.

Taneja G C and Gowe R S. 1961. Spermatozoa concentration in the semen of two breeds of fowl estimated by three different methods. Poultry Science 40: 608–15.

Yamaguchi S, Miura C, Kikuchi K, Celino F T, Agusa T, Tanabe S and Miura T. 2009. Zinc is an essential trace element for spermatogenesis. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 10859–64.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-16

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

SHANMUGAM, M., PRAKASH, B., REDDY, E. P. K., & PANDA, A. K. (2015). Dietary organic zinc and selenium supplementation improves semen quality and fertility in layer breeders. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 85(2), 202–204. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i2.46617