Quality and fatty acid profile of high and low value cuts of Barbari goat meat
396 / 35
Keywords:
Fatty acid profile, Goat meat, High value cut, Low value cut, Nuggets, Physico-chemical propertiesAbstract
Quality characteristics and fatty acid profile of muscles from high (Longissimus dorsi) and low value (Supra spinatus) goat meat cuts were investigated followed by comparison of various physicochemical properties and fatty acid profile. Nuggets were prepared with meat from these cuts and their quality and fatty acid profile were also compared. Fat and salt soluble proteins were significantly higher in muscle from low value (LV) cut while in muscle from high value (HV) water soluble proteins were high. Fatty acid profile of both the muscles did not differ significantly, however, saturated fatty acids were relatively high in LV muscle and unsaturated fatty acids in HV muscle. Ash content in emulsion and moisture level in nuggets were higher in nuggets from LV cut. Significant differences were recorded in some fatty acids composition of the products. Sensory evaluation revealed no significant differences in the various attributes of both the products.
Downloads
References
AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis.16th edn. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Banskalieva V, Sahlu T and Goetsch A L. 2000. Fatty acid composition of goat muscles and fat depots: a review. Small Ruminant Research 37(3): 255–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00128-0
Bourne M C. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food Technology 37(7): 62–66.
Crouse J, Ferrell C, Field R, Busboom J and Miller G. 1982. The relationship of fatty acid composition and carcass characteristics to meat flavor in lamb1. Journal of Food Quality 5(3): 203–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.1982.tb00744.x
Das A K, Rajkumar V and Singh S K. 2011. Effect of litter size on growth, carcass and meat quality characteristics of Barbari kids. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 17(1): 68–73.
Dhanda J S, Taylor D G, McCosker J E and Murray P J. 1999. The influence of goat genotype on the production of capretto and chevon carcasses. 3. Dissected carcass composition. Meat Science 52(4): 369–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00014-5
Hornsey H. 1956. The colour of cooked cured pork. I.—Estimation of the nitric oxide Haem pigments. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 7(8): 534–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740070804
James P, Norum K and Rosenberg I. 1992. The Nutritional Role of Fat. Meeting Summary. Nutrition Review 50: 68–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1992.tb01292.x
Johnson D, Eastridge J, Neubauer D and McGowan C. 1995. Effect of sex class on nutrient content of meat from young goat. Journal of Animal Science 73(1): 296–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.731296x
Judge M D, Aberle E, Forrest J, Hedrick H and Merkel R. 1989. Principles of Meat Science. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.
Kazala E C, Lozeman F J, Mir P S, Laroche A, Bailey D and Weselake R J. 1999. Relationship of fatty acid composition to intramuscular fat content in beef from crossbred Wagyu cattle. Journal of Animal Science 77(7): 1717–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7771717x
Laskar S and Nath D. 1998. Studies on certain qualitative aspects of goat meat marketed in Guwahati city. Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management 14: 217–18.
Mahgoub O, Khan A J, Al-Maqbaly R S, Al-Sabahi J N, Annamalai K and Al-Sakry N M. 2002. Fatty acid composition of muscle and fat tissues of Omani Jebel Akhdar goats of different sexes and weights. Meat Science 61(4): 381–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00208-X
O’fallon J, Busboom J, Nelson M and Gaskins C. 2007. A direct method for fatty acid methyl ester synthesis: Application to wet meat tissues, oils, and feedstuffs. Journal of Animal Science 85(6): 1511–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-491
Park Y W, Kouassi M A and Chin K. 1991. Moisture, total fat and cholesterol in goat organ and muscle meat. Journal of Food Science 56(5): 1191–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb04731.x
Park Y W and Washington A C. 1993. Fatty acid composition of goat organ and muscle meat of Alpine and Nubian breeds. Journal of Food Science 58(2): 245–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb04248.x
Potchoiba M, Lu C, Pinkerton F and Sahlu T. 1990. Effects of all-milk diet on weight gain, organ development, carcass characteristics and tissue composition, including fatty acids and cholesterol contents, of growing male goats. Small Ruminant Research 3(6): 583–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(90)90053-9
Qiao M, Fletcher D, Northcutt J and Smith D. 2002. The relationship between raw broiler breast meat color and composition. Poultry Science 81(3): 422–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.3.422
Ryu Y, Choi Y and Kim B. 2005. Variations in metabolite contents and protein denaturation of the Longissimus dorsi muscle in various porcine quality classifications and metabolic rates. Meat Science 71(3): 522–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.034
Sierra I. 1973. Producción de corderojoven y pesadoen la raza Rasa Aragonesa. IEPGE.
Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1995. Statistical Methods, Oxford & IBH Pub. Co., New Delhi.
Von Seggern D D and Calkins C R. 2005. Physical and chemical properties of 39 muscles from the beef chuck and round. Nebraska Beef Cattle Reports 323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.010
Warriss P, Wilkins L and Knowles T. 1999. The influence of antemortem handling on poultry meat quality. Poultry Meat Science. (Eds) Richardson R I and Mead G C. CABI Publishing, Oxon, UK: 217–30.
Wood J. 1984. Fat deposition and the quality of fat tissue in meat animals. Fats in Animal Nutrition: 407–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-408-10864-5.50027-9
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.