Effect of organic selenium and omega-3 fatty acids on performance, antioxidant status and fatty acid composition of meat in broiler chickens


457 / 43

Authors

  • P KUMAR MVSc student, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh, 491001 India
  • S P TIWARI Dean, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora, Durg
  • TARINI SAHU PhD Scholar, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh, 491001 India
  • M K GENDLEY Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Nutrition, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh, 491001 India
  • SURENDRA KUMAR NAIK PhD Scholar, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh, 491001 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i4.47870

Keywords:

Antioxidant status, Omega-3 fatty acid, Performance, Selenomethionine, Vencobb broiler

Abstract

A 2 x 3 factorial experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of adding selenomethionine (0 and 0.3 ppm) and omega-3 fatty acid (0, 0.5 and 1% of diet) on performance, blood antioxidant capacity and fatty acid composition of meat in broiler chickens. The study was conducted using broiler chicks (180) that were assigned to 1 of the 6 dietary treatments. The significant interactions were observed between selenomethionine and omega-3 fatty acids for growth performance, dressing percentage, selenium and omega-3 fatty acids composition of meat, serum antibody titer against Newcastle disease and the lymphoid organ weights. The chickens with the highest body weight and dressing percentage were fed 0.3 ppm of selenomethionine with 0.5% of omega-3 fatty acid. The lowest fat value was found in the broilers that were fed 0.5% omega-3 fatty acid. Dietary selenomethionine significantly increased the selenium content of meat. The glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) value of muscle significantly increased as the levels of selenium and fat source increased in the diet. The highest serum antibody titer against Newcastle disease was recorded in chickens that were fed the highest levels of selenium and fat source. Thus it may be speculated that selenomethionine and omega-3 fatty acid enriched broilers diet improved growth performance, antioxidant status and meat composition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allan W H and Gough R E .1974. A standard HI test for NCDV I. Comparison of macro and micro method. Veterinary Record 95: 120–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.95.6.120

Bou R and Guardiola F. 2005. Effect of dietary fat source, and zinc and selenium supplementation on the composition and consumer acceptability of chicken meat. Poultry Science 84: 1129–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.7.1129

Choct M, Naylor A J and Reinke N .2004. Selenium supplementation affects broiler growth performance, meat yield and feather coverage. British Poultry Science 45: 677– 83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660400006495

Crespo N and Esteve-Garcia E. 2002. Nutrient and fatty acid deposition in broilers fed different dietary fatty acid profiles. Poultry Science 81: 1533–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.10.1533

Dlouha G, Ševèikova S, Dokoupilova A, Zita L, Heindl J and Skrivan M. 2008. Effect of dietary selenium sources on growth performance, breast muscle selenium, glutathione peroxidase and oxidative stability in broilers. Czech Journal of Animal Science 53: 265–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/361-CJAS

Duncan D B .1955. Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics 11: 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Edens F W. 2001. Involvement of Sel-Plex in physiological stability and performance of broiler chickens. Biotechnology in the Feed industry. Proceedings of 17th Alltech’s Annual symposium. pp. 349–76 (Eds) Lyons T P, and Jacques K A. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.

Folch J, Lees M and Stanley G H S. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226: 497–509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5

Gonzalez-Esquerra E R and Leeson S. 2000. Effect of feeding hens regular or deodorized menhaden oil on production parameters, yolk fatty acid profile, and sensory quality of eggs. Poultry Science 79: 1597–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.11.1597

Jiang Z, Lin Y, Zhou G, Luo L, Jiang S and Chen F. 2009. Effects of dietary selenomethionine supplementation on growth performance, meat quality and antioxidant property in yellow broilers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57: 9769–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf902411c

Lopez-Ferrer S, Baucells M D, Barroeta A C and Grashorn M A. 2001. n-3 enrichment of chicken meat: Use of long chain fatty acids in chicken diets and their influence on meat quality: Fish oil. Poultry Science 80: 741–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.6.741

McDowell L R .1992. Minerals in Animal and Human Nutrition. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, pp. 294–311.

National Research Council. 1994. Nutritional Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington D. C.

Naylor A J, Chost M and Jacques K A. 2000. Effects of selenium source and level on performance and meat quality in male broilers. Poultry Science 79 (Suppl.): 117.

Nyquist N F, Rodbotten R F, Thomassen M and Haug A. 2013. Chicken meat nutritional value when feeding red palm oil, palm oil or rendered animal fat in combinations with linseed oil, rapeseed oil and two levels of selenium. Lipids Health Disease 12: 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-12-69

Paglia D E and Valentine W N. 1967. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 70: 158–69.

Saleh A A. 2013. Effects of fish oil on the production performances, polyunsaturated fatty acids and cholesterol levels of yolk in hens. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 25: 605–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v25i8.14005

Serhan C N, Gotlinger K, Hong S and Arita M. 2004. Resolvins, docosatrienes, and neuroprotectins, novel omega-3–derived mediators, and their aspirin-triggered endogenous epimers: an overview of their protective roles in catabasis. Prostaglandins and Other Lipid Mediators 73: 155–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2004.03.005

Shang X G, Wang F L, Li D F, Yin J D and Li J Y. 2004. Effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on the productivity of laying hens and egg quality during refrigerated storage. Poultry Science 83: 1688–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.10.1688

Simopoulos A P .2000. Human requirement for n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Symposium: Role of poultry products in enriching the human diet with n- 3 PUFA. Poultry Science 79: 961–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.7.961

Skrivan M, Dlouha G, Mašata O and Ševèikova S. 2008a. Effect of dietary selenium on lipid oxidation, selenium and vitamin E content in the meat of broiler chickens. Czech Journal of Animal Science 53: 306–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/358-CJAS

SPSS Base Applications Guide 7.5, © 1997. Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Chicago, USA.

Strange E D, Benedict R C, Smith J L and Swift C E. 1977. Evaluation of rapid tests for monitoring alterations in meat quality during storage. Journal of Food Protection 40 : 843–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-40.12.843

Yoon I, Werner M and Butler M. 2007. Effect of source and concentration of selenium on growth performance and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 86: 727–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.4.727

Zuidhof M J, Betti M, Korver D R, Hernandez F I L, Schneider B L, Carney V L and Renema R A. 2009. Omega-3–enriched broiler meat: 1. Optimization of a production system. Poultry Science 88: 1108–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00171

Downloads

Submitted

2015-04-13

Published

2015-04-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, P., TIWARI, S. P., SAHU, T., GENDLEY, M. K., & NAIK, S. K. (2015). Effect of organic selenium and omega-3 fatty acids on performance, antioxidant status and fatty acid composition of meat in broiler chickens. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 85(4), 426–430. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i4.47870
Citation