Effects of floor space on the productivity of broilers in the wet humid tropics of South Western Nigeria
299 / 35
Keywords:
Feed conversion ratio, Floor geometry, Stocking densityAbstract
Six different floor spaces, each was allotted for 4 birds in cells: F1A (2,000cm2), F2A (2,200cm2), F3A (2,400cm2), F4A (2,600cm2), F5A (2,800cm2), F6A (3,000cm2). Birds housed in each of cells of floor areas: S1A (2,400cm2) = 4, S2A (4,200cm2) = 6, S3A (5,600cm2) = 8, S4A (7,000cm2) = 10. Each was replicated thrice. Results revealed that effects of pen floor areas were significant on bird's weight of 1482±5.07 g. There were discrepancies in birds' final weights (range: 1218±2.03 to 1482±5.07 g), however, 2800cm2 pen showed nearly uniform birds' weights. Average birds' feed intakes (range: 5541g±11.30 to 5588g±14.06 g) were high in 2,800cm2 and 3,000cm2 with fluctuations recorded in feed conversion ratio in all pens, except cell 2,800cm. Stocking density had significant effect on the bird's meat quality; 2,800cm2 pen of four birds with 700cm2 per bird was hereby recommended for high broiler's performance.
Downloads
References
Adebiyi O A, Adu O A and Olumide M D. 2011. Performance characteristics and carcass quality of broiler chicks under high stocking density fed vitamin E supplemented diet. Agriculture and Biological Journal of North America 2 (8): 1160–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5251/abjna.2011.2.8.1160.1165
Alaeldein M A, Emad M S, Elsayeid O S H, Mu’ath Q Al-G and Raed M A. 2013. Impacts of stocking density on the performance and welfare of broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science 12: e11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e11
Cobb Broiler Management Guide. 2012. Broiler Management Guide.cobb-vantress.com/docs/default-source/guides/cobbbroiler-management-guide—english.pdf.
Crawford R D. 1990. Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Elsevier Publishing Co, New York, United States of America.
Dawkin M S, Donnelly C A and Jones T A. 2004. Impact of proper housing environment during growth on broiler production at higher stocking density. Nature 427: 342–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02226
Feddes J J R, Emmanuel R H and Zuidoff M J. 2006. Health Implications for Higher Density Broiler Production. Poultry Article for Poultry site. www.thepoultrysite.com/articles/683/health-implications-forhigher-density-broiler-production/
Lamidi W A. 2005. ‘Effects of floor space and stocking density on broiler production in Nigeria’. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
RSPCA Welfare Standards for Chickens. 2013. RSPCA Farm Animal Department, rspca_welfare_standards_for_chickens_ november_2013_web(1).pdf
Sara S. and Michael G. 2013. Animal welfare and food safety aspects of confining broiler chickens to cages. Animals 3: 386– 400; doi:10.3390/ani3020386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3020386
Turkyilmaz M. K. 2006. The effect of stocking density on stress reaction in broiler chicken during summer. Turk Journal of Veterinary Animal Science 32 (1): 31–36.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.