Influence of mannan-oligosaccharide and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on performance, carcass yield and biochemical profile of broiler chickens

V P PADIHARI; S P TIWARI; TARINI SAHU; M K GENDLEY; SURENDRA KUMAR NAIK

doi:10.56093/ijans.v85i8.50980

Authors

V P PADIHARI M.V.Sc., Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh 491 001 India
S P TIWARI Dean, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora, Durg
TARINI SAHU Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Animal Nutrition, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh 491 001 India
M K GENDLEY Assistant Professor, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh 491 001 India
SURENDRA KUMAR NAIK Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Animal Nutrition, Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Durg, Chhattisgarh 491 001 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i8.50980

Keywords:

Biochemical profile, Carcass yield, Mannan-oligosaccharide, Performance, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract

Day old Vencobb broiler chicks (150) were randomly allocated to 5 treatment groups with 3 replicates of 10 chicks in each to study the effect of mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) on growth performance, nutrient utilization and carcass yield. The trial lasted for 5 weeks. The starter (0-14 day), grower (14-28 days), and finisher (28-35 days) diets contained 23, 21.5 and 20% CP and 2,900, 3,000 and 3,100 kcal ME/kg feed, respectively. The control (C) group in starter, grower and finisher was supplemented with premix while their negative control (NC), mannan oligosaccharides (MOS), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) and mannan oligosaccharides+ Saccharomyces cerevisiae (MOS+SC) groups were not supplemented with premix. The later 3 groups were supplemented with MOS 500g/tonne, SC 500g/tonne and MOS+SC 500g+500g/tonne feed, respectively. Maximum conversion of feed into gain was recorded in MOS followed by SC and MOS+SC. The chicks attained relatively more body weight in MOS+SC than other groups. It was least in group C. Phosphorus retention was maximum and significant in MOS+SC in spite of their minimum intakes. There was significant improvement in weight of different cuts in MOS+SC group as compared to other groups. Maximum serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride was recorded in NC group while in the MOS supplemented treatment serum HDL cholesterol and total protein was maximum. The mean serum glucose, Ca and P was recorded highest in MOS+ SC group. It may be concluded that MOS+SC supplementation in the diet improves the overall FCR and blood biochemical profile of broiler chickens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abudabos A M and Yehia M. 2013. Effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharide from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on live performance of broilers under Clostridium perfringens challenge. Italian Journal of Animal Science 12 (2): e 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e38

Ahmad I. 2004. ‘Effect of probiotic (Protexin) on the growth of broilers with special reference to the small intestinal crypt cells proliferation.’ M. Phil thesis. Centre of Biotechnology, University of Peshawar.

AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis 14th edn. Association of official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.

Bolduan G, Shuldt A and Hackl W. 1997. Diet feeding in weaner piglets. Animal Breeding 40: 95-100.

Bradley J L and Savage T F. 1993. Effect of preincubation egg storage time and genotype on hatchability of eggs from turkey breeder hens fed a diet containing a yeast culture. Poultry Science 72: 44.

Clark E P and Collip J B. 1925. Determination of serum calcium. Journal of Biological Chemistry 63: 641-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)85009-8

Fiske C H and Subba Rao Y. 1925. Oser, B.L. 1965. Hawk’s Physiological Chemistry. 14th Edn. McGraw-Hill Co, London.

Ghasemi H A, Tahmasbi A M, Moghaddam G H, Mehri M, Alijani S, Kashefi E and Fasihi A. 2006. The effect of phytase and Saccharomyces cervisiae (Sc47) supplementation on performance, serum parameters, phosphorus and calcium retention of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 5:162-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.162.168

Iji P A, Saki A A and Tivey D R. 2001. Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on diet supplemented with a mannanoligosaccharide. Journal of Animal Science 81: 1186- 92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.925

Jin L Y W Ho, Abdullah N and Jallaludin S. 1998. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science 77: 1259-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.9.1259

Kabir S L M, Rahman M M, Rahman M B, Rahman M M and Ahmad S U. 2004. The Dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science 3 (5): 361-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.361.364

Kalavathy R, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S and Ho Y W. 2003. Effect of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of brother chickens. British Poultry Science 44: 139-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085445

Kumprecht I and Zobac F. 1997. The effect of manna oligosaccharides in feed mixtures on the performance of broilers. Zivocisna Vyroba 42: 117-24.

Lan P T, Binh T L and Benno Y. 2003.Impact of two probiotics Lactobacillus strains feeding on fecal Lactobacilli and weight gains in chickens. Journal of Genetical Applied Microbiology 49:29-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.49.29

Lan Y, Verstegen M W A, Tamminga S and Williams B A. 2005. The role of the commensal gut microbial community in broiler chickens. Journal of World Poultry Science 61:95-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200445

Mahajan P, Sahoo J and Panda P C. 1999. Effect of probiotic feeding and seasons on the growth performance and carcass quality of broilers. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 34: 167- 76.

Makarski B and Polonis A. 2001. Effect of Bioplex-Cu on the level of biochemical indices of turkey blood. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Science 10: 49-51.

Onifade A A, Odunsi A A, Babatunde G M , Olorede B R and Muma E. 1999. Comparison of the supplemental effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and antibiotics in low-protein and high-fiber diets fed to broiler chicken. Archiv Animal Nutrition 52: 29–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17450399909386149

Santin E, Maiorka A, Macari M, Grecco M, Sanchezi J C, Okada T M. and Myasaka A M. 2001. Performance and intestinal mucosa development of broiler chickens fed diets containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 10: 236-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/10.3.236

Shoeib H K and Madian A H. 2002. A study on the effect of feeding diets containing probiotics (Pronifer and biogen) on growth performance, intestinal flora and hematological picture of broiler chicks. Asian Veterinary Medical Journal 47: 112-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/avmj.2002.180397

Singh S, Sharma V P and Singh S. 1999. Performance of broiler chicks under different energy and probiotic levels during summer season. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 34: 34-37.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

Thongsong B, Kalandakanond-Thongsong S and Chavananikul V. 2008. Effects of the addition of probiotic containing both bacteria and yeast or an antibiotic on performance parameters, mortality rate and antibiotic residue in broilers. Thailand Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 38:1726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56808/2985-1130.2108

Waldroup P W, Oviedo-Randon E O and Fitts C A. 2003. Comparison of Bio-Mos and antibiotic feeding programs in broiler diets containing copper sulfate. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 2 (1): 28-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2003.28.31

Yalcinkaya I, Gungor T, Bafialan M and Erdem E. 2008. Mannan oligosaccharides from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in broilers: Effects on performance and blood biochemistry. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science 32 (1): 43-48.