Role of goats in livelihood of rural poor in Uttarakhand hills: An analysis with special reference to multivariate typology of households based on farm and socio-economic characteristics


305 / 50

Authors

  • POORNIMA SONE Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Government Poultry Farm, Chattisgarh
  • D BARDHAN Senior Scientist and corresponding author , Division of Livestock Economics, Statistics and Information Technology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, Uttar Pradesh
  • AVADHESH KUMAR Professor, Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand 246 135 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i8.50983

Keywords:

Cluster analysis, Livelihood security, Principal component analysis, Small ruminants

Abstract

The present study was conducted on a sample of 100 goat farmers randomly drawn from 2 administrative blocks in Almora, Uttarakhand to analyze the role of goats in the livelihoods of rural households. Farm household typologies were constructed by using 2 multivariate statistical techniques, viz. principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA). PCA was used to transform linearly an original set of 17 variables, representing farm and socioeconomic characteristics, into a smaller set of uncorrelated variables (factors) that represents most of the information in the original set. The factors retained from the PCA were used for cluster analysis. Five homogenous groups (clusters) were obtained. Cluster 1 (20%) was identified as households with high farm family labour involvement and low female labour involvement in goat husbandry, Cluster 2 (21%) as households with high income from agriculture and dairying, Cluster 3 (18%) as households with low income from agriculture and dairying, Cluster 4 (22%) as households with high farm family labour involvement and high female labour involvement in goat husbandry and Cluster 5 (19%) as female headed households. Contribution of income from goat in animal husbandry income, farm income and household's total income for all clusters combined was 61.45, 14.23 and 7.01%, respectively. Share of income from goat was highest for cluster 3, implying that small ruminants like goats are most important for livelihood security of resource poor farmers. Hence, any improvement in goat production enhances the socio-economic status of the farmers, specially the rural poor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bardhan D, Sharma M L and Saxena R. 2010. Livestock in Uttarakhand: Growth patterns and determinants of composition and intensity. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80 (6): 584– 89.

Berhanu T, Thiengtham J, Tudsri S, Abebe G, Tera A and Prasanpanich S. 2012. Purposes of Keeping of goats, breed preferences and selection criteria in pastoral and agro-pastoral districts of South Omo Zone. Livestock Research for development 24 (12): 45–49. www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/12/berh24213.htm.

Bidogeza J C, Berensten P B M, Graff J D and Lansink A G L M. 2007. Multivariate typology of farm households based on socio-economic characteristics explaining adoption of new technology in Rwanda. Proceedings of American Agricultural Economics Association Conference. pp. 275–81. 29 July – 1 August, 2007, Portland, Oregon.

Boogaard B K, Hendrickx S C J and Swaans K. 2012. Characterization of smallholder goat production and marketing systems in Inhassoro District, Mozambique: Results of a baseline study. ILRI Research Brief, 1 July 2012.

Chenyambuga S W, Jackson M, Ndemanisho, E E and Konwihangilo D M. 2014. Profitability and contribution of small-scale dairy goat production to income of smallholder farmers in Babati and Kongwa districts, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 26 (27). www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/2/chen26027.html.

Government of India. 2012. Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.

Garcia C G M, Dorward P and Rehman T. 2012. Farm and socioeconomic characteristics of smallholder milk producers and their influence on technology adoption in Central Mexico. Tropical Animal Health and Production 44: 1199–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0058-0

Kumar S and Upadhyay A. 2009. Goat Farmers’ Coping Strategy for Sustainable Livelihood Security in Arid Rajasthan: An Empirical Analysis. Agricultural Economics Research Review 22: 281–90.

Kumar S, Sagar R L and Vaid R K. 2006. Contribution of goats to livelihood security of small ruminant farmers in semi arid region. Indian Journal of Small Ruminant 12: 61–66.

Singh M K, Dixit A K, Roy A K and Singh S K. 2013. Goat Rearing: A Pathway for Sustainable Livelihood Security in Bundelkhand Region. Agricultural Economics Research Review 26: 79–88.

Downloads

Submitted

2015-08-11

Published

2015-08-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SONE, P., BARDHAN, D., & KUMAR, A. (2015). Role of goats in livelihood of rural poor in Uttarakhand hills: An analysis with special reference to multivariate typology of households based on farm and socio-economic characteristics. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 85(8), 913–919. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i8.50983
Citation