Evaluation of four different crossbreds developed for backyard poultry farming under intensive system


432 / 71

Authors

  • M K PADHI Principal Scientist, Regional Centre, ICAR- Central Avian Research Institute, Bhubaneshwar
  • R N CHATTERJEE Director, ICAR- Directorate on Poultry Research, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
  • S HAUNSHI Senior Scientist, ICAR- Directorate on Poultry Research, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
  • U RAJKUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR- Directorate on Poultry Research, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
  • M NIRANJAN Principal Scientist, ICAR- Directorate on Poultry Research, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
  • K S RAJARAVINDRA Scientist, ICAR- Directorate on Poultry Research, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i9.51730

Keywords:

Body weight, Conformation traits, Crossbred, Egg production

Abstract

In the present study, 4 new crosses, viz. PD1× PD4 (A), PD1 × PB2 (B), PD1x PD3 (C) and PD1 × IWI (D) were developed and evaluated under intensive system of rearing. Body weights, conformation traits were evaluated during starter and growing period and production performance were measured up to 72 weeks of age. Body weights at day 0, 2, 4, 6, 7 and 8 weeks of age in the starter period and at 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 weeks of age during growing period differed significantly between crosses in both male and female. Irrespective of age, cross B recorded higher body weight compared to other crosses. Shank length and keel length measured at 6, 8, 18 and 20 weeks of age in both the sexes differed significantly between the crosses. The maximum shank and keel lengths were achieved by 20 weeks of age. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) from 0–8 weeks of age was the best in B followed by A, C and D. The age at sexual maturity (ASM), weight at sexual maturity, body weight and shank length at 40 weeks of age, egg production up to 72 weeks of age differed significantly between different crosses. Egg weights measured at different weeks of age also differed significantly between the crosses. The egg production up to 72 weeks of age was the highest in C followed by D, A and B. Mortality % was lowest in D at different period. The results indicated that B may be useful for coloured meat type birds in rural areas whereas C and D cross may be useful for egg type as well as dual purpose backyard poultry. Cross A may be useful for dual type backyard poultry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeleke M A, Peters S O, Ozoje M O, Ikeobi C O N, Bamgbose A M and Adebambo O A. 2011. Growth performance of Nigerian local chickens in crosses involving an exotic broiler breeder. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43: 643–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9747-3

Ayyagari V. 2008 Development of varieties for rural poultry. Souvenir seminar on Sustainable Poultry production: rural and commercial approach. pp. 1–5. 3 March 2008. PDP, Hyderabad, India.

Haunshi S, Doley S and Shakuntala I. 2009. Production performance of indigenous chickens of northeastern region and improved varieties developed for backyard farming. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79: 901–05.

Kalita N, Barua N, Pathak N and Islam R. 2012. Performance of Vanaraja birds reared under intensive system of management in Assam. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 47: 125–27.

Khan A G. 2008. Indigenous breeds, crossbreds and synthetic hybrids with modified genetic and economic profiles for rural family and small scale poultry farming in India. World’s Poultry Science Journal 64: 405–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000135

Kundu A, De A K, Kundu M S, Jai Sunder, Jeykumar S and Sujatha T. 2015. Production performance of indigenous Nicobari fowls, Vanaraja and their various F1 crosses under hot and humid climate of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85:172–77.

Niranjan M, Sharma R P, Rajkumar U, Reddy B L N, Chatterjee R N and Bhattacharya T K. 2008. Comparative evaluation of production performance in improved chicken varieties for backyard farming. International Journal of Poultry Science 7: 1126–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.1128.1131

Padhi M K, Ahlawat S P S, Senani S, Saha S K and Rai R B. 2001. Comparative production performance of Black Nicobari, White Nicobari, Synthetic broiler and their crossbreds. Indian Journal of Animal Science 71: 1073–74.

Padhi M K and Chatterjee R N. 2012. Inheritance of body weight, shank length and production traits in PD1 (Vanaraja male line). Indian Journal of Poultry Science 47: 269–73.

Padhi M K, Rajkumar U, Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Panda A K, Bhattacharya T K, Reddy M R, Bhanja S K and Reddy B L N. 2012a. Comparative evaluation of male line of Vanaraja, Control broiler, Vanaraja commercial in respect to juvenile and carcass quality traits. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 47: 136–39.

Padhi M K, Rajkumar U, Niranjan M, Haunshi S and Bhanja S K. 2012b. Genetic studies of juvenile traits in Vanaraja male line a dual purpose backyard chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 47: 234–36.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N, Haunshi S and Rajkumar U. 2013. Effect of age on egg quality in chicken. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 48: 122–25.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N and Rajkumar U. 2014a. A study on performance of a crossbred chicken developed using both exotic and indigenous breeds under backyard system of rearing. Journal of Poultry Science and Technology 2: 26–29.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N and Haunshi S. 2014b. Age effects on egg quality traits in a 3-way cross egg type chicken developed for backyard poultry farming. Journal of Poultry Science and Technology 2: 52–55.

Rajkumar U, Sharma R P, Padhi M K, Rajaravindra K S, Reddy B L N, Niranjan M, Bhattacharya T K, Haunshi S and Chatterjee R N. 2011. Genetic analysis of juvenile growth and carcass traits in a full diallel mating in selected coloured broiler lines. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43: 1129–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9812-6

Rama Rao S V, Panda A K, Raju M V L N, Shyam Sunder G and Sharma R P. 2010. Interaction between dietary protein and critical amino acids on performance of birds developed for free range farming during juvenile phase. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80: 565–69.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

Tona K, Onagbesan O, Ketelaere B D, Decupere E and Bruggeman V. 2004. Effects of age of broiler breeders and egg storage on egg quality, hatchability, chick quality, chick weight, and chick post hatch growth to forty-two days. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13: 10–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.1.10

Downloads

Submitted

2015-09-11

Published

2015-09-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PADHI, M. K., CHATTERJEE, R. N., HAUNSHI, S., RAJKUMAR, U., NIRANJAN, M., & RAJARAVINDRA, K. S. (2015). Evaluation of four different crossbreds developed for backyard poultry farming under intensive system. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 85(9), 985–990. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i9.51730
Citation