Effect of supplementation of organic zinc on the zinc level and quality traits of eggs in broiler breeders
411 / 41
Keywords:
Broiler breeders, Egg quality, Organic zinc, Zinc level in eggAbstract
Broiler breeder hens (264) of 32 weeks of age were distributed randomly in 4 dietary treatments. The dietary treatments were T0: Broiler breeder ration containing 40ppm zinc (basal 29.8 ppm + 10.2 ppm inorganic zinc), T1: T0 + organic zinc (zinc methionine) @ 20ppm, T2: T0 + organic zinc @ 40ppm and T3: T0 + organic zinc @ 60ppm. The experiment was continued from 32 to 48 weeks of age. At 35, 39, 43 and 48 week, the egg quality traits and zinc level in the eggs were assessed. Expect the egg shell thickness, the other studied egg quality parameters viz. egg weight (g), egg length (mm), egg breadth (mm), egg shell thickness without membrane (mm), yolk height (mm), yolk diameter (mm), albumen height (mm), albumen weight (g), yolk weight (g), egg shell weight (g), shape index and Haugh unit of female broiler breeder of different treatments during the experimental period did not differ significantly in all the periods. The zinc content of egg shell of all the groups of broiler breeder birds did not differ significantly at 32 and 39 week of age but at 40 and 48 weeks of study, significantly higher egg shell zinc content was observed in T3 group and lowest in T0. The zinc content in the egg albumen of all the groups of broiler breeder birds did not differ significantly in all the periods of study. Except at 35 weeks, the zinc content of egg yolk and total egg differed significantly with lowest levels was observed in T0. The egg shell thickness and egg shell weight of 40ppm and 60ppm zinc supplemented group were significantly higher than all other groups. Other egg quality traits found to be unaffected among treatment groups.
Downloads
References
Abdallah A G, El-Husseiny O M and Abdel-Latit K O. 2009. Influence of some dietary organic mineral supplementations on broiler performance. International Journal of Poultry Science 8(3): 291–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.291.298
Ao T, Pierce J L, Power R, Dawson K A, Pescatore A J, Cantor A H and Ford M J. 2006. Evaluation of Bioplex Zn as an organic zinc sources for chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science 5(9): 808–11. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Benjamin Frankin Station, Washington, D.C.
BIS 1992. Bureau of Indian Standards, Poultry Feeds Specification. 4th revised edn. Manak Bhawan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India
Cheng T and Guo Y. 2004. Effect of Salmonella Typhimurium lipopolysaccharide challenge on the performance, immune responses and zinc metabolism of laying hens supplemented with two zinc sources. Animal Science 17:1717–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.1717
Feng J, Ma W Q, Niu H H, Wu X M, Wang Y and Feng J. 2009. Effects of zinc glycine chelate on growth, hematological, and immunological characteristics in broilers. Biological Trace Element Research 28: 8431–39.
Guo Y M, Yang R, Yuan j, Ward T L and Fakler T M. 2002. Effect of Availa Zn and ZnSO4 on laying hen performance and egg quality. Poultry Science 81 (suppl.1): 40 (Abstract)
Haugh R R. 1937. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg and poultry magazine 43: 552–55.
Hudson B P, Dozier W A, Wilson III J L, Sander J E and Ward T L. 2004. Reproductive performance and immune status of caged broiler breeder hens provided diets supplemented with either inorganic or organic sources of zinc from hatchery to 65 wk of age. Journal of Applied Poultry Science 13: 349–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.2.349
Idowu O M O, Ajuwon R O, Oso A O and Akinloye O A. 2011. Effects of zinc supplementation on laying performance, serum chemistry and zinc residue in tibia bone, liver, excreta and egg shell of laying hens. International Journal of Poultry Science 10 (3): 225–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.225.230
Keshavarz K. 2001. The influence of drinking water containing sodium chloride on performance and egg shell quality of modern colored laying strain. Cornell Poultry Pointers 51: 12–13.
Kidd M T, Anthony N B. and Lee S R. 1992. Progeny performance when dams and chicks are fed supplemental zinc. Poultry Science 71(7):1201–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711201
Klecker D, Zeman L, Jelinek P and Bunesova A. 2002. Effect of manganese and zinc chelates on the quality of eggs. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 50: 59–68.
Mabe I, Rapp C, Bain M M and Nys Y. 2003. Supplementation of a corn-soybean meal diet with manganese, copper, and zinc from organic or inorganic sources improves eggshell quality in aged laying hens. Poultry Science 82 (12): 1903–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1903
Piper C S. 1966. Soil Plant Analysis. Hans Publication, Bombay, pp. 135–36.
Plaimast Hatairat, Sirichakwal Prapaisri, Puwastien Prapasri and Kijparkorn Suwanna. 2008. Effect of supplementary zinc from organic and inorganic sources of laying performance and zinc deposition in egg. Thailand Journal of Veterinary Medicine 38 (3): 47–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56808/2985-1130.2131
Richards M P. 1997. Trace mineral metabolism in the avian embryo. Poultry Science 76(1): 152–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.1.152
Swiatkiewicz S and Koreleski J. 2008. The effect of zinc and manganese source in the diet for laying hens on eggshell and bones quality. Veterinarni Medicina 53(10): 555–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/1966-VETMED
Tabatabaie M M, Aliarabi H, Saki A, Ahmedi A and Hosseini Siyar S A. 2007. Effect of different sources and levels of zinc on egg quality hen performance. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10: 3476–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.3476.3478
Underwood E J. 1962. Zinc in Trace Elements in Human and Animal Nutrition. 2nd edn, P 157–86. (Ed.) Underwood E J. Academic Press, New York.
Wedekind K J, Hortin A E and Baker D H. 1992. Methodology for assessing zinc bioavailability: Efficacy estimates for zincmethionine, zinc sulphate and zinc oxide. Journal of Animal Science 70(1): 178–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.701178x
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.