Milk ring test from lab to field: A surveillance strategy for states under brucellosis control program

Authors

  • R SHOME Principal Scientist, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 064 India
  • M NAGALINGAM Scientist, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 064 India
  • B R SHOME Principal Scientist, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 064 India
  • JYOTI MISRI Principal Scientist (AH), Division of Animal Science, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi
  • B S PADMASHREE Senior Research Fellow, National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 064 India
  • A KAMAL Director, NPRE. National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 064 India
  • R G BAMBAL Assistant Commissioner (LH),GOI, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi
  • H RAHMAN Assistant Commissioner (LH),GOI, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i10.52386

Keywords:

Brucellosis, Control program, ELISA, Milk, MRT

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alton G G, Jones L M, Angus R D and Verger J M. 1988. Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. Institut National de la Recherche, Nouzilly, France.

Beh K J. 1973. Distribution of Brucella antibody among immunoglobulin classes and a low molecular weight antibody fraction in serum and whey of cattle. Research in Veterinary Science 14: 381–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(18)33892-X

Bercovich Z and Moerman A. 1979. Non-specific positive milk ring test(s) in tank milk and Estrumater in the treatment of cattle. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 104: 713–16.

Chand P, Sadana J R, Malhotra A K and Poonia J S. 2004. Indirect ELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella melitensis in sheep milk. Veterinary Record 155: 639– 41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.155.20.639

Gall D, Nielsen K, Bermudez M R, Moreno F and Smith P. 2002. Fluorescence polarization assay for detection of Brucella abortus antibodies in bulk tank bovine milk samples. Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 9: 1356–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.9.6.1356-1360.2002

Huber J and Nicoletti P. 1986. Comparison of the results of card, rivanol, complement fixation and milk ring test with the isolation rate of Brucella abortus from cattle. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 1529–31.

Hunter D and Allan J. 1972. An evaluation of milk and blood tests used to diagnose brucellosis. Veterinary Record 88: 310– 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.91.13.310

MacMillan A. 1990. Conventional serological tests. Animal Brucellosis. pp. 153–97. (Eds) Neilsen K H and Duncan J R. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

Mahajan S, Agrawal R and Pande N. 2011. A comparative evaluation of different diagnostic tests for brucellosis in buffaloes. Buffalo Bulletin 30: 75–8.

National Bovine Brucellosis Surveillance Plan Veterinary Services Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health National Surveillance Unit October. 2012. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/animal_diseases/brucellosis/downloads/nat_bruc_surv_plan.pdf.

Noviello S. 2004. Laboratory- acquired brucellosis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 10: 1848–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1010.040076

OIE. 2009. Bovine Brucellosis in Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. World Organization for Animal Health, Paris, France; 1–35.

Shome R, Padmashree B S, Krithiga N, Triveni K, Sahay S, Shome BR, Singh P, Rahman H. 2014. Bovine brucellosis in organized farms of India - An assessment of diagnostic assays and risk factors. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2 (10): 557–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2014/2.10.557.564

Sutra L, Caffin J and Dubray G. 1986. Role of immunoglobulins in the Brucella milk ring test. Veterinary Microbiology 12: 359–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(86)90085-4

Tanwani S K and Pathak P N. 1971. Studies on abortus bang ring test: factors affecting the nature of reaction in different milk samples. Indian Journal for Animal Sciences 41: 1037– 40.

Trangadia B, Rana S K, Mukherjee F and Srinivasan V A. 2010. Prevalence of brucellosis and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in organized dairy farms in India. Tropical Animal Health Production 42: 203–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9407-7

Downloads

Submitted

2015-10-07

Published

2015-10-07

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

SHOME, R., NAGALINGAM, M., SHOME, B. R., MISRI, J., PADMASHREE, B. S., KAMAL, A., BAMBAL, R. G., & RAHMAN, H. (2015). Milk ring test from lab to field: A surveillance strategy for states under brucellosis control program. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 85(10), 1077–1080. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i10.52386