Freezability of mithun (Bos frontalis) semen
Abstract views: 183 / PDF downloads: 20
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i12.54386
Keywords:
Freezability, Mithun, Physicomorphological parameters, Post-thaw semenAbstract
The present study was conducted to assess the freezability of the mithun semen. Post-thaw physicomorphological parameters (PMPs) such as post-thaw motility, viability, total sperm abnormality, integrity of acrosome, plasma membrane and nucleus and vanguard distance travelled in bovine cervical mucus by sperm (BCMPT) of ejaculates, biochemical attributes such as, aspartate amino transaminase (AST), alanine amino transaminase (ALT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and in vitro zona binding ability of spermatozoa with heterologous (buffalo) oocyte were studied in freezable and nonfreezable ejaculates. Ejaculates (50) were collected from healthy matured mithun bulls and grouped based on the post-thaw motility into freezable and nonfreezable. These selected ejaculates were extended with standard Tris egg yolk citrate glycerol extender and stored at ultra low temperature (–196°C). Post-thaw PMPs, binding index (BI) and binding % (BP) and biochemical profiles were examined with standard protocols. The results revealed that the PMPs, biochemical profiles, BI and BP differed significantly between freezable and nonfreezable ejaculates. The post-thaw motility was positively correlated with livability, intactness of acrosome, plasma membrane, nucleus and vanguard distance travelled by sperm and negatively correlated with post-thaw total sperm abnormality. It was concluded that the post-thaw PMPs and BI and BP were significantly higher, biochemical intracellular enzymatic profiles were significantly lower in freezable than in nonfreezable ejaculates indicates freezable sperm has functionally stable sperm structures and higher intactness of plasma and acrosomal membrane to motile faster and in forward direction to reach the fertilization site and successful conception.Downloads
References
Anil Kumar R and Devanathan T G. 1995. In-vitro penetration of bovine cervical mucus by frozen bull spermatozoa. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 16 (2):109–10.
Barth A D and Oko R J. 1989. Preparation of semen for morphological examination. Abnormal Morphology of Bovine Spermatozoa. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. pp. 8– 18.
Bhoite U Y, Sutar D A and Ulmek B R. 2005. Effect of season and period on semen characteristics of two and three breed Gir crosses. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 26 (1): 43–45.
Bishop M W H, Campbell R C, Hancock J L and Watson A. 1954. Semen characteristics and fertility in bulls. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 44: 227–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600046311
Dogan I, Polat U and Nur Z. 2009. Correlations between seminal plasma enzyme activities and semen parameters in seminal fluid of Arabian horses. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research 10: 119–24.
Fazeli A R, Steenweg W, Bevers M M, de Loos F A M, Van den Broek J and Colenbrander B. 1993. Development of sperm zona pellucida binding assay for bull semen. Veterinary Record 132: 14–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.132.1.14
Fiaz M, Usmani R H, Abdullah M and Ahmad T. 2010. Evaluation of semen quality of Holstein Friesian and Jersey bulls maintained under subtropical environment. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 30 (2): 75–78.
Gebreselassie G A. 2009. ‘Studies on physico-morphological characteristics and certain enzymes in freezable and nonfreezable semen ejaculates of crossbred bulls.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute (Deemed University), Izatnagar, India.
Gebreselassie G A, Srivastava S K, Ghosh S K, Suman C L and Tripathi R P. 2012. Physico - morphological characteristics of crossbred bull semen. Indian Veterinary Journal 89 (5): 91– 93.
Ghosh S K, Singh S K, Singh L P, Das G K, Tripathi R P and Loyi T. 2007. Rejection rate in crossbred bull semen. Compendium Of 23rd Annual Convention and National Symposium on Challenges in Improving Reproductive Efficiency of Farm and Pet Animals. Bhubaneswar, Orissa, December 7–9, 2007.
Javed M T, Khan A and Kauser R. 2000. Effect of age and season on some semen parameters of Nili-Ravi buffalo bulls. Veterinarski-Archiv 70: 83–94.
Jeyendran R S, Vander Ven H H, Parez-Pelaez M, Crabo B G and Zaneweld L J D. 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 70: 219–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219
Kumar N, Verma R P, Singh L P, Varshney V P and Dass S S. 2006. Effect of different levels and sources of zinc supplementation on quantitative and qualitative semen attributes and serum testosterone level in crossbred cattle (Bos indicus × Bos taurus) bulls. Reproduction, Nutrition and Development 46: 663–75. Lopez M L, Grez P, Gribbel I and Bustos Obregón E. 1989. Cytochemical and ultrastructural characteristics of the stallion epididymis (Equus cabalus). Journal Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology 21: 103–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2006041
Loyi T. 2008. ‘Comparative studies on electrolytes and total seminal plasma protein between freezable and non- freezable crossbred bull semen.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute (Deemed University), Izatnagar, India.
Matouseket J, Riha J, Sarsen V, Veselky H and Londa F. 1989. Penetration of cervical mucus and other body fluids by bull sperm in capillary tubes. Animal Reproduction Science 18: 161– 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(89)90018-3
Mayuri R. 2006. ‘Studies on oxidative damages and effects of certain antioxidants on buffalo spermatozoa during cryopreservation.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute (Deemed University), Izatnagar, India.
Mishra A K and Tyagi S. 2006. Recent trends in the semen collection, evaluation and cryopreservation. National Seminar on Artificial Insemination: Acceptability, Impact, Constraints and Solution. pp. 95–105.
Mishra T P, Saxena V B and Tripathi S S. 1988. Cryopreservation of semen of crossbred bulls of two different genotypes. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 58: 1424–26.
Mohanty D N. 1999. ‘Studies on reproductive soundness, freezability and fertility in CB bulls.’ Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar.
Pace M M and Graham E F. 1970. The release of glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase from bovine spermatozoa as a test method of assessing semen quality and fertility. Biology of Reproduction 3: 140–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biolreprod/3.2.140
Perumal P, Selvaraju S, Selvakumar S, Barik A K, Mohanty D N, Das S, Das R K and Mishra P C. 2011a. Effect of pre-freeze addition of cysteine hydrochloride and reduced glutathione in semen of crossbred Jersey bulls on sperm parameters and conception rates. Reproduction in Domestic Animal 46 (4): 636–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01719.x
Perumal P, Selvaraju S, Barik A K, Mohanty D N, Das S and Mishra P C. 2011b. Role of reduced glutathione in improving post-thaw seminal parameters in poor freezable Jersey crossbred bull semen. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 81 (8): 807–10.
Prasad J K, Kumar S, Mohan G, Shankar U and Agarwal S K. 2000. Biochemical studies pertaining to freezability of cross bred bull semen. Indian Journal of Veterinary Research 8: 37–40.
Prasad J K. 1997. ‘Studies on enzymatic changes and in vitro Fertility test in relation to cryopreservation of crossbred bull semen.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar.
Ramachandran N, Verma G S, Gupta A K, Raina V S, Mohanty T K and Singh M K. 2007. Prediction of fertility based on frozenthawed traits in Sahiwal bulls. Indian Journal of Dairy Sciences 77: 684–87.
Raval R J and Dhami A J. 2010. Effect of additives on various spermatozoal attributes of fresh, Frozen-thawed and refrigerated semen. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 31 (1): 33–36.
Roberts S J. 1982. Veterinary Obstetrics and Genital Diseases. 2nd edn. CBS Publisher and Distributors, New Delhi, India.
Sagdeo L R, Chitnis A B, Deshmukh S N and Kaikini A S. 1990. Studies on semen freezability of pure Jersey and crossbred bulls with varying levels of exotic inheritance. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 11: 79–84.
Salisbury G W, VanDemark N L and Lodge J R. 1978. Physiology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination of Cattle. 2nd edn, pp: 259–60.W.H Freeman and Company.
Sharma M L, Mohan G and Sahni K L. 1992. A study on acrosomal damage on cryopreservation of crossbred bull semen. Indian Veterinary Journal 69: 962–64.
Singh M, Ghosh S K, Prasad J K, Kumar A, Ramteke S S and Bhure S K. 2013. Heparin binding proteins of buffalo bulls seminal plasma and their relationship with semen freezability. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83 (7): 700–04.
Tomar N S, Sharma K C and Shukla S N. 1985. Semen production in relation to the age of HF × Hariana bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 62 (6): 499–501.
Tomar N S. 1997. Artificial Insemination and Reproduction of Cattle and Buffaloes. Sarojprakashan, Allahabad, India. Tyagi S, Mathur A K and Agarwal S C. 2000. Semen production performance of Frieswal bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 70: 1032–34.
Watson P F. 1975. Use of Giemsa stain to detect change in acrosome of frozen ram spermatozoa. Veterinary Record 97: 12–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.97.1.12
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.