Intervention points for small ruminant development in India: Insight from a field level survey


Abstract views: 247 / PDF downloads: 16

Authors

  • A SURESH Senior Scientist (Ag Economics), Division of Agricultural Economics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012 India
  • K R CHAUDHARY Senior Technical Officer, National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, Pusa, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i12.54409

Keywords:

Goat, India, Institutions, Sheep, Small ruminants

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to identify the intervention points for small ruminant sector development, assess socio-economic status of small ruminant farmers as well as reach of institutions and technology in small ruminant development. The study was undertaken by using field level information collected through primary survey from 400 farmers of Andhra Pradesh (undivided) and Rajasthan. The technologies with regard to vaccination have exhibited larger level of adoption compared to other technologies. The most important constraints faced by farmers were with regard to veterinary care, feed and fodder and live animal marketing. The institutional sources, as epitomized by veterinarians of state government turned out to be the most important source of treatment (67%). Self-treatment without consultation is practiced by almost 100% farmers. Farmers heavily depend on the common pastures for feed and fodder requirement. Penetration of insurance was very low. The credit absorption was only about 7%, and that too from money lenders. Another major constraint was with respect to marketing systems- the live animal markets are highly under developed- the farmers continue to rely on traditional market channels. The study points to the need to improve efficacy of institutional mechanisms including reforming livestock markets, strengthening veterinary care systems with improved man power, efforts to conserve pasture land and improve its productivity, and, channeling greater credit and insurance coverage for the small ruminant sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya S S and Ahuja K. 1998. Marketing Infrastructure for Livestock Development: A Study of Live Animal Markets of Rajasthan. Institute of Development Studies, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Birthal P S and Taneja V K. 2012. Opertionalizing the pro-poor potential of livestock: issues and strategies. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82 (5): 441–47.

Central Statistical Office. 2014. National Accounts Statistics 2014. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.

Government of India. 2013. Livestock Census. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.

Kumar R, Suresh A, Singh D R, Kumar S and Chaudhary K R. 2014. Strengthening livestock production and marketing: An analysis of migratory sheep production and performance of small ruminant markets in Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 69 (3): 318–19.

Kumar S. and Pant K P. 2003. Development perspective of goat rearing in India: Status, Issues and Strategies. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 58 (4): 752–66.

Planning commission. 2011. Report of the Working Group on Animal Husbandry & Dairying: 12th Five Year Plan, Government of India.

Suresh A and Kavita B. 2012. Production and export of meat of small ruminants in India: an overview. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 18 (2): 163–72.

Suresh A, Gupta D C and Mann J S. 2008. Returns and economic efficiency of sheep farming in semi-arid regions: a study in Rajasthan. Agricultural Economics Research Review 21 (2):227–34.

Suresh A, Kavita B and Chaudhary K R. 2012. India’s meat export: structure, composition and future prospects. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82 (7): 87–94.

Downloads

Submitted

2015-12-18

Published

2015-12-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SURESH, A., & CHAUDHARY, K. R. (2015). Intervention points for small ruminant development in India: Insight from a field level survey. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 85(12), 1384–1389. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v85i12.54409
Citation