A preliminary assessment of new bovine and avian tuberculin in cattle by intra-dermal tests and whole blood interferon gamma assay


Abstract views: 156 / PDF downloads: 67

Authors

  • MINAKSHI YADAV Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • RISHENDRA VERMA Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i1.54997

Keywords:

Cervical SIT, CFT, IFN-γ test, M. bovis 3/86, M. avium N-17, PPD

Abstract

The present study reports ante-mortem diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis employing tuberculin test using a new tuberculin PPDB (M. bovis, 3/86) and interferon gamma assay in cattle whole blood culture stimulated using a commercial bovine IFN- γ assay kit. Dairy cattle (87) categorized in groups A, B and C were tested using tuberculin test and gamma interferon (IFN-γ). Fresh batches of bovine PPD (from M. bovis 3/86) and avian PPD (M. avium N–17) were prepared and were standardized by conforming to sterility, safety and potency. For tuberculin testing cervical single intradermal test (SIT) and caudal fold test (CFT) were performed using tuberculins at concentration of 1mg/ml and at the concentration of 0.3mg/ ml as a stimulating antigens in IFN-γ test. Out of 80 cattle (group A + B), 44 (55%) were reactor to tuberculin, 21 (26.25%) non reactor and 15 (18.75%) were inconclusive animals and by IFN-γ test 36 (45%) were M. bovis positive, 10 (12.5%) negative, 13 (16.25%) inconclusive and 21 (26.25%) were M. avium positive animals. In group C (not tuberculin tested) only 4 (57.14%) out of 7 cattle were positive. Relative sensitivity of IFN-γ test (63.88%) was higher than the tuberculin test (52.27%). Our study indicated that skin tests (CFT and SIT) and IFN-γ test can be used for successful control and eradication of bovine tuberculosis as IFN-γ test had higher sensitivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Kantor I N, Odeon A C, Steffan P E, Auza M J, Madrid C R and Marchevsky N. 1984. Sensitivity of the cervical and caudal fold tuberculin tests with Mycobacterium bovis in infected cattle of Argentina. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties (Paris) 3 (1): 139–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.3.1.148

Erico F, De Kantor I N, Baltar J, Silva M and Millan A. 1989. Comparison of the specificity of cervical fold tuberculin test applied to bovines in Uruguay. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties (Paris) 8 (4): 1031– 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.8.4.461

Garg Akshay and Rishendra Verma 2008. Quality control and diagnostic efficiency of bovine PPD (tuberculin) from indigenous M. bovis. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 78 (9): 908–13.

Gormley E, Doyle M B, McGill K, Costello E, Good M and Collins J D. 2004. The effect of the tuberculin test and the consequences of a delay in blood culture on the sensitivity of a gamma-interferon assay for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 102: 413–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.08.002

Monaghan M L, Doherty M L., Collins, J D, Kazda J F and Quinn P J. 1994. The tuberculin test. Veterinary Microbiology 40: 111–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(94)90050-7

MacDiarmid S C and Hellstrom J S. 1987. An intradermal test for the diagnosis of Brucellosis in extensively managed cattle herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 4 (5): 361–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(87)90022-5

Mukherjee F. 2006. Comparative prevalence of tuberculosis in two dairy herds in India. Revue Scientifique et Technique (Paris) 25 1125–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.25.3.1717

Norby Bo, Paul C Bartlett, Scott D Fitzgerald, Larry M Granger, Colleen S Bruning-Fann, Diana L Whipple and Janet B Payeur. 2004. The sensitivity of gross necropsy, caudal fold and comparative cervical tests for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 16:126–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870401600206

O.I.E. 2009. Chapter on Bovine Tuberculosis. O.I.E. 2014. World Organization of Animal Health. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Vol 1. Chapter 2.4.1 Bovine Tuberculosis.

Palmer M V, Waters W R and Whipple D L. 2004. Investigation of the transmission of Mycobacterium bovis from deer to cattle through indirect contact. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65: 1483–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1483

Rothel J S, Jones S L, Corner L A, Cox J C and Wood P R. 1992. The gamma-interferon assay for diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in cattle: conditions affecting the production of gamma-interferon in whole blood culture. Australian Veterinary Journal 69: 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1992.tb09848.x

Strain S A J, McNair J, McDowell S W J. 2012. A review of the application of the interferon gamma Test. Bacteriology Branch Veterinary Sciences Division Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute. www.dardni.gov.uk/review-of-international-application-of-the-interferon-gamma-test.pdf.

Vervenne R A, Jones S L, van Soolingen D, van der Laan T, Andersen P, Heidt P J, Thomas A W and Langermans J A 2004. TB diagnosis in non-human primates: comparison of two interferon-gamma assays and the skin test for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 100: 61–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.03.003

Vordermeier M, Whelan A, Ewer K, Goodchild T, Clifton-Hadley R, Williams J, Hewinson RG. 2006. The BOVIGAM® assay as ancillary test to the Tuberculin skin test. Government Veterinary Journal 16 (1): 72–80.

Whelan A O, Coad M, Peck Z A A, Clifford D, Hewinson R G and Vordermeier H M. 2004. Influence of skin testing and overnight sample storage on blood-based diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Veterinary Record 155: 204–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.155.7.204

Whelan A O, Clifford D, Upadhyay B, Breadon L E, McNair J, Hewinson G R and Vodermeier M H. 2010. Development of a skin test for bovine tuberculosis for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 48 (9): 3176–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00420-10

Whipple D L, Palmer M V, Slaughter R E and Jones S L. 2001. Comparison of purifiedprotein derivatives and effect of skin testing on results of a commercial gamma-interferon assay for diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle. Journal of Veterinary Diagnosis and Investigation 13: 117–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870101300204

Wood P R, Corner, L A, Rothel J S, Baldock C, Jones S L, Cousins D B, McCormick B S, Francis B R, Creeper J and Tweedle N E. 1991. Field comparison of interferon gamma assay and the intradermal tuberculin test for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Australian Veterinary Journal 68: 286–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1991.tb03254.x

Downloads

Submitted

2016-01-13

Published

2016-01-11

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

YADAV, M., & VERMA, R. (2016). A preliminary assessment of new bovine and avian tuberculin in cattle by intra-dermal tests and whole blood interferon gamma assay. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i1.54997
Citation