Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with bovine brucellosis in western Uttar Pradesh, India


468 / 136

Authors

  • AMIT KUMAR Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidalaya Evam Go Anushandhan Sansthan, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 001 India
  • V K GUPTA CADRAD, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar
  • AMIT KUMAR VERMA Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidalaya Evam Go Anushandhan Sansthan, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 001 India
  • SAHZAD SAHZAD Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidalaya Evam Go Anushandhan Sansthan, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 001 India
  • V KUMAR Central Institute for Research on Goats, Makhdoom, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 122 India
  • AJAY SINGH Uttar Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidalaya Evam Go Anushandhan Sansthan, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh 281 001 India
  • N C P REDDY Veterinary Services Division, Zoetis, Mumbai

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i2.55771

Keywords:

Brucellosis, Buffalo, Cattle, Risk factors, Seroprevalence

Abstract

The present study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of brucellosis in cattle and buffaloes of western Uttar Pradesh, India and possible risk factors associated with it. Blood samples collected from 1,019 animals (dairy cattle and buffaloes) of different age and sex from 17 districts of western Uttar Pradesh, India where no vaccination against brucellosis is practiced were subjected to indirect ELISA for detection of Brucella antibodies. The overall mean seropositivity was 12.37% with seropositivity in unorganized and organized farms 4.08% and 24.88%, respectively. The young calves were having significantly higher seropositivity (10.38%) and it further increased in sexually matured adults (12.71%) in comparison to older animals (9.17%). Overall seropositivity and risk factors logistic regression analyses showed that species and farming type (organized and unorganized) had significant effect and sex of animals and their age group had no significant effect on the positivity of brucellosis. In absence of any vaccination presence of circulating antibodies against Brucella in all age group of animals indicated the natural circulation of infection in the state. Study indicated an urgent need of policy for prevention and control of brucellosis in dairy animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bandyopadhyay S, Sasmal D, Dutta T K, Ghosh M K, Sarkar M, Sasmal N K and Bhattacharya M. 2009. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in yaks (Poephagusgrunniens) in India and evaluation of protective immunity to S19 vaccine. Tropical Animal Health Production 41: 587–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9228-0

Bayemi P H, Webb E C, Nsongka M V, Unger H and Njakoi H. 2009. Prevalence of Brucella abortus antibodies in serum of Holstein cattle in Cameroon. Tropical Animal Health Production 41: 141–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9184-8

Kachhawaha S, Singh K and Tanwar R K. 2005. Serological survey of Brucellosis in cattle and buffaloes of Jodhpur Region. Veterinary Practicener 6: 43–44.

Khurana S K, Srivastava S K and Prabhudas K. 2012. Seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis in Haryana by avidin- biotin serum ELISA and its comparison with RBPT and SAT. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82: 448–50.

Kumar N, Pal B C, Yadav, S K, Verma A K, Jain U and Yadav G. 2009. Prevalence of Bovine Brucellosis in Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Veterinary Public Health 7: 129–31.

Mai H M, Irons P C, Kabir J and Thompson P N. 2012. A large seroprevalence survey of brucellosis in cattle herds under diverse production systems in northern Nigeria. BMC Veterinary Research 8: 144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-144

Manish K, Chand P, Rajesh C, Teena R and Sunil K. 2013. Brucellosis: An updated review of the disease. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 3–16.

Nasir A A, Parveen Z, Shah M A and Rashid M. 2004. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in animals at government and private livestock farms in Punjab. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 24: 144-46.

Neha, Ahmed W, Verma A K, Jain U and Bist B. 2014. Brucellosis in organized dairy farm: An investigation. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences 8: 29–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajas.2014.29.33

OIE. 2008. Manual of the Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial animals, Vol 1, 5th Edition (Office International Des Epizooties, Paris, France), 409–38 pp.

PD-ADMAS. 2011. Animal Disease Monitoring and Surveilance report 1994–2002. IAH and VB, Bangalore, India.

Saha T, Guha C, Chakraborty D, Biswas U, Pal B, Sarkar M and Chatterjee A. 2010. Seroprevalence of brucellosis and isolation and identification of Brucella in cattle in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80: 1087–88.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical methods, Oxford and IBH publishing Co., New Delhi.

Solorio-Rivera J L, Segura-Correa J C and Sa´nchez-Gil L G. 2007. Seroprevalence of and risk factors for brucellosis of goats in herds of Michoacan, Mexico. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 82: 282–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.024

Tiwari R, Sharma M C, Mishra K K and Singh B P. 2013. Economic impacts of infectious diseases of livestock. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 316–20.

Verma A K, Dhama K, Chakraborty S, Kumar A, Tiwari R, Rahal A, Mahima and Singh S V. 2014. Strategies for combating and eradicating important infectious diseases of animals with particular reference to India: Present and Future Perspectives. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9: 77–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2014.77.106

Downloads

Submitted

2016-02-09

Published

2016-02-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMAR, A., GUPTA, V. K., VERMA, A. K., SAHZAD, S., KUMAR, V., SINGH, A., & REDDY, N. C. P. (2016). Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with bovine brucellosis in western Uttar Pradesh, India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86(2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i2.55771
Citation