Characteristics and freezability of Gir bull semen


Abstract views: 301 / PDF downloads: 129

Authors

  • B P SONAR R. B. IV, 996 - B, C- Road, Near Limpus Club, 40 Block Bhusawal, District Jalgoan, Maharashtra
  • R P TIWARI Chhattishgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Anjora, Durg, Chhattishgarh 491 001 India
  • M R POYAM Chhattishgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Anjora, Durg, Chhattishgarh 491 001 India
  • G K MISHRA Chhattishgarh Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, Anjora, Durg, Chhattishgarh 491 001 India
  • A K PANDEY LLRUVAS, Hisar, Haryana
  • A K NAIR Central Semen Station, Government of Chhattisgarh
  • S A SAHASRABUDHE Central Semen Station, Government of Chhattisgarh

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i3.56643

Keywords:

Freezability, Gir bulls, Semen characteristics

Abstract

The present research was undertaken to study the characteristics of fresh and cryo-preserved semen of elite pure breed Gir (Bos indicus) bulls. The mean values of fresh seminal parameters in neat semen viz. seminal volume (ml), sperm concentration (millions/ml), progressive sperm motility (%), live sperm (%), intact acrosome (%), total morphological sperm abnormalities (%), hypo osmotic swelling (HOS %) and sperm penetration distance (SPD- mm) were 4.99 ± 0.26, 895.33 ± 82.68, 69.10 ± 0.75, 72.16 ± 0.64, 84.42 ± 0.77, 15.96 ± 0.44, 60.12 ± 1.19 and 31.32 ± 0.70, respectively. Sperm concentration, individual motility, live sperm, total sperm abnormalities and sperm penetration distance differed significantly between bulls. The semen was extended, filled and sealed in 0.25 ml straws maintaining 20 million spermatozoa/straw and cryo-preserved using programmable bio freezer (IMV). Cryo-preserved semen was assessed 24 h after freezing and immediately after thawing. Freezing significantly lowered progressive sperm motility (69.10 ± 0.75 vs 53.81 ± 0.61), intact acrosome (84.42 ± 0.77 vs 75.69 ± 1.10), HOST (60.12 ± 1.19 vs 55.71 ±1.33) and CMPT (31.32 ± 0.70 vs 27.97 ±0.72). Whereas, significantly higher percentages of sperm abnormalities (15.96 ± 0.44 vs 16.92 ± 0.57) were observed after freezing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad M, Asmat M T, Rehman N U and Khan M Z. 2003. Semen characteristics of Sahiwal bulls in relation to age and season. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 23 (4):202–06.

Ahmad N. 1994. Clinical and experimental studies of reproductive functions in the ram and male goat with special reference to the use of diagnostic ultrasound. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. Department of Large Animal Medicine and Surgery, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London.

Andrabi S M H, Naheed S, Khan A and Ullah N. 2002. Semen characteristics of crossbred (Friesian × Sahiwal) bulls at livestock research station, National agricultural research centre, Islamabad. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 22 (4): 181–87.

Arancibia E A, Hube W A, Jara M C and Veer O C. 1987. Effect of sudden temperature changes in thawed semen on the percentage of sperm motility and spermatozoa with normal acrosome in mini tubes. Animal Breeding Abstract 55 (5): 2797.

Babu Rao K, Venugopal Naidu, Singh V and Sheshgiri Rao A. 1999. Studies on some enzymes level and their extracellular leakage during preservation of Punganur bull semen. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 20: 47–50.

Barth A D. 1997. Evaluation of potential breeding soundness of the bull. Current Therapy in Large Animal. pp. 222–36.

(Ed.) Youngquist R S. W B Saunders. Theriogenology. Philadelphia. Belorkar P M, Dhami A J and Kodagali S B. 1990. Physiological norms and correlations of seminal characters, biochemical constituents, freezability and fertility in crossbred bulls. Paper presented at the VI National Symposium of SAPI, held at AAU, Guwahati (Asom). pp. 24–26.

Belorkar P M, Dhami A J and Kodagali S B. 1993. Effect of season and extenders on freezability, GOT release and fertility of crossbred bull’s semen. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 46 (5): 198–202.

Bhosrekar M R, Purohit J R, Pande A B and Mangurkar B R. 1986. Effect of collection regime and equilibration period on the quality and freezability of semen of crossbred bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 56 (1): 58–59.

Bhupal S, Mohan G and Sahni K L. 1993. A comparative study on the freezability of semen of cattle (native and exotic) and buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 63: 1172–73.

Blesbois E. 2007. Current status in avian semen cryopreservation. World’s Poultry Science Journal 63: 213–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001419

Campbell R G, Hancock J L and Rothschild L. 1953. Counting live and dead bull spermatozoa. Journal of Experimental Biology 30: 44–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.30.1.44

Chacon J. 2001. Assessment of sperm morphology in zebu bulls under field conditions in the tropics. Reproduction and Domestic Animals 36: 91–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2001.00253.x

Chenoweth P J, Hopkins F M, Spitzer J C and Larsen R E. 1994. New Guidelines for the Evaluation of Bulls for Breeding Soundness. The bovine proceedings. 26 January. pp. 105– 07.

Collins W J, Bratton R W and Henderson C R. 1951. Cited by Tomar (1984). The relationship of semen production to sexual excitement of dairy bulls. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 34: 224–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(51)91698-0

Correa J R and Zavos P M. 1994. The hypo osmotic swelling test, its employment as an assay to evaluate the functional integrity of the frozen thawed bovine sperm membrane. Theriogenology 42: 351– 60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)90280-1

Dev S, Pangaonkar G R, Sharma R K and Martroo J S. 1996. Sperm mucus penetration and its relation to semen quality of buffalo bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 66:713–15.

Dhami A J, Sahni K L and Mohan G. 1991. Effect of pre freeze holding time (at 5ºC) and thawing rates on post thaw motility and thermoresistance of Bubaline and Taurine spermatozoa. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 12 (2):129–34.

Dhami A J and Sahni K L. 1993. Evaluation of different cooling rates, equilibration periods and diluents for effects on deep- freezing, enzyme leakage and fertility of taurine bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology 40: 1269–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90297-I

Fiaz M, Usmani R H, Abdullah M and Ahmad T. 2010. Evaluation of semen quality of Holstein Friesian and Jersey bulls maintained under subtropical environment. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 30 (2): 75–78.

Galli A, Bornaghi V, Balduzzi D, Butazzoni L and Aleandri R. 1991. Sexual behavior and semen quality relating to Italian buffalo. Proceedings of IIIrd World Buffalo Congress, Varna, Bulgaria 3: 562–70.

Ganguly N C. 1988. Problems of long term semen preservation. 2nd World Buffalo Congress. New Delhi 2: 21.

Gaur G K, Kaushik S N and Garg R C. 2003. The Gir cattle breed of India - characteristics and present status. AGRI 33: 21–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900001607

Gilbert and Almquist J O. 1978. Effects of processing procedure on post thaw acrosome retention and motility of bovine spermatozoa packed in 0.3 ml straw at room temperature. Journal of Animal Science 46 (1): 225–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.461225x

Graham E F, Crabo B and GandBrown K L. 1985. Effectof some zwitter ion buffers on freezing and storage of spermatozoa of bull. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 55: 372–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(72)85499-7

Gupta H P, Saxena V B and Tripathi S S. 1990. A rapid method for evaluation of semen quality in bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 60 (3): 329–30.

Hafez E S E. 1993. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 6th edn, pp. 405–39. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.

Holt W V. 2000. Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Animal Reproduction Science 62: 2–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00152-4

Javed M T, Khan A and Ali M. 2000. Influence of season on seminal plasma testosterone and oestrogen in healthy and abnormal buffalo bulls and their relationship with other semen parameters. Veterinarski Archiv 70 (3): 141–49.

Jeyendran R S, Van der Ven H H, Perez-Pelaez M, Grabo B G and Zaneveld L Z D. 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 70: 219–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219

Kale M, Manik M R S and Tomer O S. 2000. Invitro assessment of crossbred buck fertility. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 70: 25–29.

Karmur S D, Rana C M, Dhami A J and Panchani G V. 2002. Hypo-osmotic swelling test in relation to motility of fresh and frozen thawed murrah buffalo semen. Indian Journal of Diary Science 55 (6): 363–65.

Kedia N K, Tiwari R P, Mishra G K, Poyam M R, Pandey A K, Nair A K and Sahasrabudhe S.A. 2014. Characterestics and freezability of Tharparkar bull semen. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 84 (4): 382–88.

Keel B A and Webster B W. 1988. Correlation of human sperm motility characteristics with an in vitro cervical mucus penetration test. Fertility and Sterility 49:138–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)59665-4

Kremer J. 1965. A simple sperm penetration test. International Journal of Fertility 10: 209–15.

Krogenaes A, Andersen-Berg K, Hafne A L and Engelan E. 1994. Membrane alterations in bull spermatozoa after freezing and thawing and after in vitro fertilization. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 35: 17–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03548352

Kumar S. 1979. ‘Effect of successive ejaculations on cytomorphology and biochemistry of bull and buffalo semen.’ M.V.Sc. thesis. G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar.

Kumar P and Singhal L K., 2006. Gir: An important milch cattle of western India. The Indian Cow 7: 67–68.

Kumar R A and Devanathan T G. 1996. Effect of spermatozoal quality on sperm progression speed in cervical mucus. Indian Veterinary Journal 73:645–48.

Kumare J S. 2004. ‘Effect of foot and mouth disease vaccination on post thaw seminal attributes.’ M.V.Sc Thesis MAFSU, Nagpur.

Lagerlof N. 1934. Morphologic studies on the changes in the sperm structure and in the testes of bulls with decreased or abolished fertility. Acta Pathology Microbiology Scandinavica 19: (supp.). 254.

Luthra R A and Mariony M F. 1995. Effect of season on the incidence of sperm abnormalities in fresh and frozen semen of Holstein Friesian bulls in Bulgaria. Indian Veterinary Journal 72: 244–46.

Mandal D K and Tyagi S. 2007. Cyto-morphological abnormalities and cell membrane integrity of frozen thawed spermatozoa of Frieswal bulls and their relationship with fertility. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 28 (2): 30–33.

Mathevon M, Buhr M M and Dekkers J C. 1998. Environmental, management, and genetic factors affecting semen production in Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 81 (12): 3321–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75898-9

Matousek J, Riha J, Srsen V, Veseisky L and Louda F. 1989. Penetration of cervical mucus and other body fluids by bull sperm in capillary tubes. Animal Reproduction Science 18:161– 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(89)90018-3

Mixner J P. 1959. Interference by glycerol with differential staining of bull spermatozoa as used with semen thawed from the frozen state. Journal of Dairy Science 37: 1090–93.

Mourya V P and Tuli R K. 2003. Post-thaw termal resistance on motility and acrosomal integrity of filtered and non-filtered frozen semen of Murrah buffalo bulls. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 16 (10): 1424–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.1424

Mukherjee D P and Bhattacharya P. 1952. Seasonal variation in semen quality, haemoglobin and packed cell volume contents of blood in bulls. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 22: 73.

Murase T and Braun J W. 1990. Impact of methodological factors on sperm penetration into cervical mucus in cattle. Theriogenology 34: 73–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(90)90578-H

Nair A. 1997. ‘Studies on cryopreservation of crossbred bull semen in relation to osmolality, biochemical indices and in- vitro fertility tests.’ M.V.Sc. Thesis, Deemed University, IVRI, Izatnagar. UP.

Nath R, Tripathi S S, Saxena V B and Tripathi R D. 1991. Tris diluent and freezability of buffalo semen. Indian Veterinary Journal 68 (20): 139.

Nur Z, Dogan I, Gunay U and Kemal Soylu M. 2005. Relationships between sperm membrane integrity and other semen quality characteristics of the semen of Saanen goat bucks. Bull Veterinary Institute Pulawy 49:183–87.

O’Connor M T, Amann R P and Saacke R G. 1981. Comparisons of computer evaluations of spermatozoal motility with standard laboratory tests and their use for predicting fertility. Journal of Animal Science 53: 1368–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.5351368x

Okuda K, Murase T, Sato K, Matsuzaki S, Wane S and Iwno N. 1988. Penetration ability of bull spermatozoa into cervical mucus. Proceedings of 11th Congress Animal Reproduction Artificial Insemination, Dublin 3: 279.

Pangaonkar G R and Sharma R D. 1989. Spermiogram and cytomorphology of spermatozoa in relation to freezability of Holstein Freisian semen. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 10: 60–63.

Pant H C, Mittal A K, Patel S H, Shukla H R, Kasiraj R and Prabhakar J H. 2002. The hypoosmotic swelling test: an assay of cell membrane integrity and quality of frozen thawed buffalo semen. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 23: 8–11.

Pathak V. 2008. ‘Studies on seminal characteristics and freezability of Sahiwal and Red Sindhi bull.’ M.V.Sc. thesis submitted to Indira Gandhi Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Raipur.

Prabhu S S and Sharma U D. 1954. Seminal characteristics in Murrah bull semen. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 23: 273.

Pramanik P S and Raina V S. 1998. Refrigerator preservation of buffalo semen in various extender. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 51 (6): 375–79.

Prasad J K, Kumar S, Mohan G, Agrawal S K and Shankar U. 1999a. Simple modified method for cervical mucus penetration test for quality assessment of bull semen. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 69 (2): 103–05.

Prasad J K, Satish Kumar, Greesh Mohan, Uma Shankar and Agrawal S K. 1999b. Hypo osmotic swelling test and its response in fresh and freeze thawed semen. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 69 (10): 766–69.

Ramchandran N, Verma G S, Gupta A K, Raina V S, Mohanty T K and Singh M K. 2006. In vitro assessment of seminal traits and fertility parameters of Sahiwal bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 27 (2): 100–03.

Rana C M and Dhami A J. 2004. Physical attributes, intact acrosome, HOS test and freezability of semen of Gir and Jafarabadi bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 81: 406–10.

Rao A V N, Sreemannarayan O and Rao C V. 1996. Studies on sex behaviour and seminal traits in Ongole, Jersey, Jersey × Ongole and Murrah bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 73: 284– 87.

Rao T L N. AND Rao A R. 1978. Semen characteristics of cross bred bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 55: 692.

Rao T T, Rao M M, Rao K B and Naidu K V. 2010. Studies on scrotal biometry, ejaculate, characteristics and fertility in Ongole bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 31 (2): 4–6.

Rasbech N C. 1975. Tris egg yolk citric acid glycerol as extender for bovine semen. Manual for Indo-Danish Training Course. DANIDA. Institute for Animal Reproduction, Copenhagen.

Rasul Z, Anzar M, Jalali S and Ahmad N 2000. Effect of buffering system on post thaw motion characteristics, plasma membrane integrity and acrosomal morphology of buffalo spermatozoa. Animal Reproduction Science 59: 131–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00070-1

Raval R J, Dhami A J and Kavani F S. 2007. Effect of extender- additives on motility, viability and acrosomal integrity of triplebred (HF×J×K) bulls’s spermatozoa during cryopreservation. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 2 (2): 7–15.

Revell S G and Mrode R A. 1994. An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Animal Reproduction Science 36: 77– 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(94)90055-8

Rodriguez-Martinez H. 2003. Laboratory semen assessment and prediction of fertility: still utopia? Reproduction of Domestic Animals 38: 312–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2003.00436.x

Saacke R G and Marshall C C. 1968. Acrosomal cap abnormalities of sperm from subfertile bulls. Journal of Animal Science 27:1391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.2751391x

Saacke R G and White J M. 1972. Semen quality tests and their relationship to fertility. 4th NAAB Technical Conference on Artificial Insemination and Reproduction. P 22. Salisbury G W, Van Demark N L and Lodge J R. 1978. Physiology of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination of Cattle. 2nd edn, pp. 385–479. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

Sardar M J U. 2007. Environmant related variation in the semen characteristics of bulls used for artificial insemination (AI) programme in Bangladesh. University Journal of Zoology Rajashahi University 26: 81–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/ujzru.v26i0.706

Saxena V B and Tripathi S S. 1985. Studies on effect of seasons on sperm abnormalities in Red Dane bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 62: 531–32.

Shannon P and Vishwanath R. 1995. The effect of optimal and suboptimal concentrations of sperm on the fertility of fresh and frozen bovine semen and a theoretical model to explain the fertility differences. Animal Reproduction Science 39: 1– 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(95)01376-B

Sharma M L, Mohan G and Sahni K L. 1990. A comparative study of acrosomal morphology of crossbred and Holstein Friesian bull semen. Indian Journal of Animal Research 11: 96–99.

Shelke VB and Dhami AJ. 2001. Comparetive evaluation of physio- morphological attributes and freezability of semen of Gir cattle (Bos indicus) and Jafarabadi buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 71 (4): 319–24.

Shrivastava S and Kumar S. 2006. Effect of certain additives on the freezability of crossbred bull semen. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 27 (1): 1–5.

Singh D M and Pangaonkar G R. 1990. Studies on some characteristics of exotic and crossbred bull spermatozoa. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 11 (2): 92–95.

Singh J, Pangawkar G R, Biswas R K and Kumar N. 1991. Studies on buffalo sperm morphology during various stages of freezing in certain extenders. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 12 (2): 126–29.

Singh S P, Pandit R K and Bhadoria H B S. 2000. Sexual Behaviour and seminal characteristics in Jersey, Sahiwal and halfbred bulls. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 70 (3): 279– 80.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. The Iowa state university press, Ioea. USA

Soderquist L, Janson L, Haard M and Einarsson S. 1996. Influence of season, age, breed and some other factors on the variation in sperm morphological abnormalities in Swedish dairy A.I. bulls. Animal Reproduction Science 44: 91–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(96)01498-4

Soderquist L, Jansson L, Larsson H and Einaarsson S. 1991. Sperm morphology and fertility in AI bulls. Journal of Veterinary Medical Association 38: 534–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1991.tb01045.x

Steinbach J and Foote R H. 1967. Osmotic pressure and pH effects on survival of frozen bovine spermatozoa. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 205–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(67)87389-2

Suryaprakasham T B and Rao A V N. 1993. Studies on the seminal characteristics of multiple breed AI bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 70:629–32.

Suttiyovin P, Thwaetes C J, Sanchez-partida L G and Setchell B P. 1995. Evaluation of modified sperm penetration test in Ram semen. Theriogenology 44:131–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00145-X

Tang S, Garrett C and Gordan Baker H W. 1999. Comparison of human cervical mucus and artificial sperm penetration media. Human Reproduction 13 (11): 2812–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.11.2812

Tasseron F, Amir D and Schindler H. 1977. Acrosomal damage of ram spermatozoa during dilution, cooling and freezing. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 51: 461–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0510461

Thakur S, Singh M and Vasishta N K. 2006. Studies on the semen quality of different Veterinary Institutions. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction 27 (1): 59–61.

Thanawala A J. 1985. ‘Feasibility of using soluble gelatin containers for the packing and deep freezing of Cow bull semen.’ M.V.Sc thesis submitted to Kokan Krishi Vidyapith, Dapoli.

Thongtip N, Saikhun J, Mahasawangkul S, Kornkaewrat K, Pongsopavijitr P, Songsasen N and Pinyopummin A. 2008. Potential factors affecting semen quality in the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 6: 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-6-9

Valakazi D M. 2003. ‘Factors affecting quality of semen of AI dairy bulls in South Africa.’ Dissertation submitted at department of Animal and wildlife sciences, University of Pretoria. Pretoria, South Africa. p. 1–85.

Veeraiah G, Naidu K V and Rao K B. 1999. Studies on semen characteristics of Ongole bulls. Indian Veterinary Journal 76: 585–60.

Vyas M C, Vyas K K and Dwarkanath P K. 1974. Deterioration of nucleic acids in the semen of bulls and buffalo bulls during storage. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 44: 4–8.

Watson P F. 1975. Use of Giemsa stain to detect changes in the acrosome of frozen Ram spermatozoa. Veterinary Record 97: 12–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.97.1.12

Watson P F. 2000. The causes of reduced fertility with Cryopreserved semen. Animal Reproduction Science 60 & 61: 481–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3

Downloads

Submitted

2016-03-14

Published

2016-03-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SONAR, B. P., TIWARI, R. P., POYAM, M. R., MISHRA, G. K., PANDEY, A. K., NAIR, A. K., & SAHASRABUDHE, S. A. (2016). Characteristics and freezability of Gir bull semen. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86(3), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i3.56643
Citation