The presence of heparin binding proteins and their impact on semen quality of Holstein Friesian bulls

G KRISHNAN; A THANGVEL; K LOGANATHASAMY; C VEERAPANDIAN; P KUMARASAMY; M KARUNAKARAN

doi:10.56093/ijans.v86i4.57716

Authors

G KRISHNAN ICAR National Research Centre on Yak, Dirang
A THANGVEL Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India
K LOGANATHASAMY Madras Veterinary College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 007 India
C VEERAPANDIAN Veterinary College and Research Institute, Orathnadu
P KUMARASAMY Veterinary College and Research Institute, Orathnadu
M KARUNAKARAN ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Kalyani, West Bengal

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i4.57716

Keywords:

24 and 30 kDa, Heparin binding proteins, Quality, Semen

Abstract

Present study was designed to evaluate the semen quality of breeding bulls positive for 24 and 30 kDa heparin binding proteins (HBPs) in the semen. Seventeen Holstein Friesian breeding bulls were screened for 24 and 30 kDa HBPs in semen by heparin-sepharose affinity chromatography and SDS-PAGE, and grouped into three based on presence/absence of HBPs. In vitro characteristics of spermatozoa were assessed by standard analysis of sperm abnormalities, functional membrane integrity, acrosome integrity and sperm chromatin integrity in fresh and frozen- thawed semen. Bulls positive for 30 kDa had lowest sperm abnormalities and sperm chromatin fragmentation than bulls positive for 24 kDa and without HBPs in the fresh ejaculates. Further, fresh semen positive for 30 kDa had 8.76% of higher active plasma membrane with 7.63% intact acrosome. The process of cryopreservation of semen increased sperm abnormalities, acrosome damage and chromatin fragmentation in all the semen samples irrespective of presence/absence of HBPs. However, semen samples positive for 24 and 30 kDa HBPs were able to sustain lower percentage of post-thaw sperm abnormalities with higher chromatin integrity in comparison to semen devoid of HBPs. Moreover, semen with 24 and 30 kDa HBPs had higher post-thaw intact acrosome with active plasma membrane than negative semen. The results concluded that bulls positive for 30 kDa had 12.43 and 28.37 percentages of better semen quality than bulls with 24 kDa and devoid of HBPs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Makhzoomi A, Lundeheim N, Haard M and Rodryguez- Martynez H. 2008. Sperm morphology and fertility of progeny- tested AI dairy bulls in Sweden. Theriogenology 70: 682–91. Ardon F and Suarez S S. 2013. Cryopreservation increases coating of bull sperm by seminal plasma binder of sperm proteins BSP1, BSP3 and BSP5. Reproduction 146: 111–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-12-0468

Asadpour R, Alavi-Shoushtari S M, Asri Rezaii S, Khan M H and Ansari K M. 2007. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of buffalo bulls seminal plasma proteins and their relation with semen freezability. Animal Reproduction Science 102: 308–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.003

Ashrafi I, Kohram H and Tayefi-Nasrabadi H. 2013. Antioxidant effects of bovine serum albumin on kinetics, microscopic and oxidative characters of cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 11 (3): 695–701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013113-3870

Ashrafzadeh A, Karsani S A and Nathan S. 2013. Mammalian sperm fertility related proteins. International Journal of Medical Sciences 10 (12): 1649–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.6395

Ax R L. 2004. A new test screens bulls for a protein that enables them to settle more cows earlier. Western Cowman 7: 28–32.

Barrera C, Mazzolli A B, Pelling C and Stockert J C. 1993. Metachromatic staining of human sperm nuclei after reduction of disulfiphide bonds. Acta Histochemica 94: 141–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-1281(11)80366-1

Bromfield E G, John Aitken R, GibbZ, Lambourne S R and Nixon B. 2014. Capacitation in the presence of methyl-b-cyclodextrin results in enhanced zona pellucida-binding ability of stallion spermatozoa. Reproduction 147: 153–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-13-0393

Dogan S, Vargovic P, Oliveira R, Belser L E, Kaya A, Moura A, Sutovsky P, Parrish J, Topper E and Memili E. 2015. Sperm protamine-status correlates to the fertility of breeding bulls. Biology of Reproduction DOI:10.1095/biolreprod.114.124255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.114.124255

Goularte K L, Gastal G D A, Schiavon R S, Goncalves A O, Schneider J R, Corcini C D and Lucia T. 2014. Association between the presence of protein bands in ram seminal plasma and sperm tolerance to freezing. Animal Reproduction Science 146: 165–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.03.009

Hernandez D A K, Barrientos-Morales M, Cervantes A P, Hernandez B A, Dominguez M B and Absalon-Medina VA. 2015. Antioxidant effects of seminal plasma on cellular morphological viability of swine semen post-cryopreservation. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology 6 (3): 225. doi:10.4172/2157-7579.1000225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7579.1000225

Jeyendran R S, Van Der Ven H H, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo B G and Zaneveld L J D. 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. Journal of Reproduction Fertility 70: 219–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219

Karoui S, Diaz C, Gonzalez C, Amenabar M E, Serrano M, Ugarte E, Gosalvez J, Roy R, Lopez-Fernandez C and Carabano M J. 2012. Is sperm DNA fragmentation a good marker for field AI bull fertility. Journal of Animal Science doi:10.2527/ jas.2011–4492.

Karunakaran M, Devanathan T G, Kulasekar K, Sridevi P, Jawahar T P, Loganathsamy K, Dhali A and Selvaraju S. 2012. Effect of heparin binding protein and hydrogen peroxide on lipid peroxidation status of bovine sperm cells. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82 (9): 976–78.

Kutty M V H, Remya V, Shyma V H, Radhika S, Shende A M and Bhure S K. 2014. An overview on binder of sperm proteins of cattle. International Journal of Livestock Research 4 (4): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20140629034437

Laemmli V K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 660–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0

Lopez-Ubeda R and Matas C. 2015. An approach to the factors related to sperm capacitation process. Andrology 4: 128. doi:10.4172/2167–0250.1000128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0250.1000128

Malik A, Laily M and Zakir M I. 2015. Effects of long term storage of semen in liquid nitrogen on the viability, motility and abnormality of frozen thawed Frisian Holstein bull spermatozoa. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction 4 (1): 22–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2305-0500(14)60052-X

Manaskova P, Liberda J V, Ticha M and Jonakova V. 2002. Isolation of non-heparin-binding and heparin-binding proteins of boar prostate. Journal of Chromatology 770: 137–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00480-7

Manjunath P, Lefebvre J, Jois P S, Fan J and Wright M W. 2009. New nomenclature for mammalian BSP genes. Biology of Reproduction 80: 394–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.108.074088

Mendoza N, Casao A, Perez-Pe R, Jose A, Cebrian-Perez and Muino-Blanco T. 2013. New insights into the mechanisms of ram sperm protection by seminal plasma proteins. Biology of Reproduction 88 (6): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.105650

Moura A A, Chapman D A and Killian G J. 2007. Proteins of the accessory sex glands associated with the oocyte-penetrating capacity of cauda epididymal sperm from Holstein bulls of documented fertility. Molecular Reproduction Development 74: 214–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20590

Nandare R, Derashri H and Joshi C. 2011. Evaluation of Buffalo bull spermatozoal damage using single cell gel electrophoresis. International Journal of Life Science and Pharmacology Research 1 (1): 38–43.

Odhiambo J F, DeJarnette J M, Geary T W, Kennedy C E, Suarez S S, Sutovsky M and Sutovsky P. 2014. Increased conception rates in beef cattle inseminated with nanopurified bull semen. Biology of Reproduction 91 (4): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.114.121897

Ustuner B, Nur Z, Alcay S, Toker M B, Sagirkaya H, Soylu M K. 2015. Effect of freezing rate on goat sperm morphology and DNA integrity. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 39: 110–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1407-70

Waterhouse K E, Gjeldnes A, Tverdal A, De Angelis P M, Farstad W, Haard M and Kommisrud E. 2010. Alterations of sperm DNA integrity during cryopreservation procedure and in vitro incubation of bull semen. Animal Reproduction Science 117: 34–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.04.011

Watson P F. 1975. Use of Giemsa stain to detect changes in the acrosome of frozen ram spermatozoa. Veterinary Record 97: 12–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.97.1.12

Zodinsanga V, Mavi P S, Cheema Ranjna S, Kumar A, Gandotra V K. 2015. Relationship between routine analysis/sperm function and fertility tests of cattle bull semen. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences 9 (1): 18–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajas.2015.37.44