Immunocompetence based scoring index for evaluating disease resistance status in indigenous and exotic breeds of chicken


377 / 102

Authors

  • A KUNDU ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • D P SINGH ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • S C MOHAPATRA ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i8.60597

Keywords:

Exotic birds scoring index, Immunocompetence, Indigenous birds scoring index, Mortality, Sheep red blood cells

Abstract

Birds (433) of both sexes developed from 8 genetically diverse lines of chickens like Aseel, Kadakanath, Naked Neck and Frizzle fowl along with imported breeds Dahlem Red, White Leghorn, Synthetic Dan Line broiler (SDL) and Naked Neck broiler (NNB) were evaluated for immunocompetence traits, viz. haemagglutinin test (HA), mercaptoethanol resistant (MER or IgG), classical pathway (CPW) and alternate pathway (APW) response to sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) at 0, 5, 12 and 19 days post immunization (pi), CMI response (as foot index against PHA-P), phagocytic index (PI) using carbon clearance test. Per cent mortality was also recorded based on whole hatch from which sample birds were drawn for each group from 0–20 weeks of age. Based on the results of immunocompetence traits, a scoring index was formed and various genotypes were ranked. Dahlem Red exhibited highest HA response followed by indigenous breeds. SDL broilers and White Leghorns ranked lowest for HA response. Dahlem Red excelled all other genetic stocks for IgG, FI and only next in order to Aseel and Kadakanath for CPW and APW. The index was constructed giving equal weightage to each of the traits. Broilers and White Leghorns, which ranked lowest, exhibited highest mortality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almid I. 1981. Indirect selection of bulls for improved resistance to diseases in dairy cattle. Livestock production Science 3: 321–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(81)90050-6

Buchmann H and Meyer J. 1989. An immunocompetence profile in swine. Improving Genetic Disease Resistance in Farm Animals. pp 145–52. (Eds)Vanderzijpp A J and Sybesma W. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1057-7_16

Cheng S and Lamont S J. 1990. Selection for general immunocompetence in chickens. Proceeding of the Fourth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Edinburgh 23–27 July XVI Poultry, Fish and Horse Genetics and Breeding, Growth and Reproduction, Immune Response and Disease Resistance 58–61 (fide Animal Breeding Abstract 58 (12)).

Cheng S and Lamont S J.1988. Genetic analysis of immunocompetence measures in a White Leghorn chicken line. Poultry Science 67: 989–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0670989

Hersh E M, Guttermann J U, Alexamian R, Lotova E and Murphy G. 1981. A parameter host defense assay system for evaluating biological response modifier therapy of human cancer. American Association of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 22: 372–75.

Kean R P, Cahaner A, Freeman A E and Lamont S J. 1994. Direct and correlated responses to multitrait, divergent selection for immuno competence. Poultry Science 73: 18–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730018

Kundu A, Singh D P, Mohapatra S C, Dash B B, Moudgal P and Bisht G S. 1999. Antibody response to sheep erythrocyte in Indian native vis-à-vis imported breeds of chickens. British Poultry Science 40: 40–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669987818

Kundu A. 1997. ‘Comparison among genetically diverse lines of chickens for immunocompetence measures.’ Ph. D. thesis submitted to IVRI Deemed University, IVRI, Izatnagar, Bareilly, U.P. India.

Kundu A. 2000. Immunocompetence status of Indian native vis- à-vis imported breeds of chickens – 2 mercaptoethanol resistance (IgG) and sensitive antibody response to sheep erythrocytes. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 34: 295–02.

Kundu A, Singh D P and Mohapatra S C. 2015 a. In vivo phagocytic activity in various indigenous and exotic breeds of chicken for genetic selection. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85: 91–93.

Kundu A, Singh D P and Mohapatra S C. 2015b. In vivo cell – mediated immune response in various indigenous and exotic breeds of chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85: 52– 54.

Kundu A, Singh D P and Mohapatra S C. 2015c. Calcium dependent (CPW) and independent pathway (APW) antibody response to sheep red blood cells in various Indian indigenous and imported breeds of chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85: 129–34.

Meyer J, Buchmann H and Krausslich H.1981. Selection on antibody response in pigs. 32nd Annual Meeting of European Association for Animal Production No. G.1.4, 4pp.

Pavel Yu G, Fedotovskii A N and Meel A Yu. 1980. Determination of genotype index of natural resistance. Genetica 16: 899– 904.

Sivaraman G K and Kumar Sanjeev. 2006. Immune responsiveness to IBDV vaccine in SDL broiler chicken lines divergently selected for immunocompetence index. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 41: 21–25.

Sivaraman G K and Kumar Sanjeev. 2010. Kinetics of antibody response to NDV vaccine in specialized broiler chicken lines divergently selected for immunocompetence index. Journal of Applied Animal Research 37: 167–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2010.9707118

Ulo P. 1975. Concerning the determination of genetic potential for non-specific resistance in animals and man. EestiNSV Aestinsv Teaduste Acadeemia Toimetised 24: 275–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3176/biol.1975.4.02

Val’Daman E K, Fedotovskii A N, Pavel Yu G, Meel A Y and Pavel E A. 1984. The degree of natural resistance and viability on Kurtna type fowl. Dokady Vsesoyuz noi Akademii Sel Skokhozyaistvennykh Nauk 10: 31–32.

Downloads

Submitted

2016-08-05

Published

2016-08-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUNDU, A., SINGH, D. P., & MOHAPATRA, S. C. (2016). Immunocompetence based scoring index for evaluating disease resistance status in indigenous and exotic breeds of chicken. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86(8), 861–864. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i8.60597
Citation