Influence of Salix babylonica extract addition on in vitro rumen gas production and degradability of ryegrass silage harvested in different cutting days


206 / 80

Authors

  • A Z M SALEM Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México
  • A E KHOLIF National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth St. Dokki, Giza, Egypt
  • M M Y ELGHANDOUR Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México
  • J HERNÁNDEZ Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México
  • A G LIMAS Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México
  • M CIPRIANO Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México
  • L M CAMACHO Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México
  • S ROJAS Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México
  • J OLIVARES Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i9.61576

Keywords:

Cutting day, Gas production, Ryegrass, Salix babylonica, Silage

Abstract

Four cutoffs of ryegrass after 15 days (CD15), 30 days (CD30), 45 days (CD45), and 60 days (CD60) with Salix babylonica (SB) extract at 0, 30, and 60 ml/kg ryegrass silage were ensiled for 40 days and then evaluated for the in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility and gas production (GP). No interactions occurred between cutting day and SB extract for silage’s nutrient contents and in vitro GP. The DM and organic matter (OM) contents were decreased linearly with decreased crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibres, acid detergent fibres, and acid detergent lignin contents with advancing of days. In contrary, addition of SB extract increased silages’ OM and decreased CP contents. Addition of SB extract for CD15 and CD60 silages, quadratically decreased the lag time. However, SB extract increased the rate of GP and GP during the first 12 h of incubation at the level of 30 ml/kg with CD30 silage and asymptotic GP with the level 60 ml/kg of CD60 silage. Increased DM degradability (DMD) of CD30 and CD60 silages versus decreased DMD with CD15 with increased relative GP (ml gas/g DMD). It could be concluded that CD15 had the highest DM and OM content; however, higher GP was noted with CD45 and CD60. SB extract had weak effects on nutrient content and GP, and the level of 30 ml/kg DM was more effective than the level of 60 ml/kg DM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC 1997. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA, USA.

Ariciaga G C. 2005. Comparación de las técnicas in sacco e in vitro mediante producción de gas para estimar NA tasa de degradación y fermentación ruminal de heno y ensilado de pasto Ryegrass. Tesis de Licenciatura. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Toluca, México. 69 p.

Castro H H. 2006. Composición química, contenido mineral y digestibilidad in vitro del forraje Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) en relación con la madurez y época del año. Tesis de licenciatura. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Toluca, México. pp 30–32.

France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa M S, Lopez S and Bannink A. 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. British Journal of Nutrition 83: 143–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114500000180

Getachew G, Makkar H P S and Becker K. 2002. Tropical browses: contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoichiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production. Journal of Animal Science 139: 341– 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859602002393

González R M, Fondevila M, Barrios U A and Newman Y. 1998. In vitro gas production from buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris L.) fermentation in relation to the cutting interval, the level of nitrogen fertilisation and the season of growth. Animal Feed Science and Technology 72: 19–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00181-8

Menke K H, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D and Schneider W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Animal Science 92: 217–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086305

Salem A Z M, Kholif A E, Elghandour M M Y, Buendía G, Mariezcurrena M D, Hernandez S R and Camacho L M. 2014b. Influence of oral administration of Salix babylonica extract on milk production and composition in dairy cows. Italian Journal of Animal Science 13: 10–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.2978

Salem A Z M, Kholif A E, Olivares M, Elghandour M M Y, Mellado M and Arece J. 2014a. Influence of S. babylonica extract on feed intake, growth performance and diet on in vitro gas production profile in young lambs. Tropical Animal Health and Production 46: 213–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0478-0

SAS 2002. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Ver 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

Theodorou M K, Williams B A, Dhanoa M S, Mcallan A B and France J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48: 185– 97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6

Valdes K I, Salem A Z M, Lopez S, Alonso M U, Rivero N, Elghandour M M Y, Domínguez I A, Ronquillo M G and Kholif A E. 2015. Influence of exogenous enzymes in presence of Salix babylonica extract on digestibility, microbial protein synthesis and performance of lambs fed maize silage. Journal of Agricultural Science 153: 732–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859614000975

Downloads

Submitted

2016-09-16

Published

2016-09-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SALEM, A. Z. M., KHOLIF, A. E., ELGHANDOUR, M. M. Y., HERNÁNDEZ, J., LIMAS, A. G., CIPRIANO, M., CAMACHO, L. M., ROJAS, S., & OLIVARES, J. (2016). Influence of Salix babylonica extract addition on in vitro rumen gas production and degradability of ryegrass silage harvested in different cutting days. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86(9), 1030–1035. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i9.61576
Citation