Semen collection, evaluation and fertile period in Khaki Campbell and White Pekin breeds of ducks


241 / 136

Authors

  • S C GIRI Central Avian Research Institute, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha 751 003 India
  • K V H SASTRY Central Avian Research Institute, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha 751 003 India
  • SUJATA K SAHOO Central Avian Research Institute, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha 751 003 India
  • P KUMAR Central Avian Research Institute, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha 751 003 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i10.62379

Keywords:

Artificial insemination, Ducks, Fertile period, Semen collection

Abstract

Collection and evaluation of semen are the first critical steps for examination of male fertility, gamete preservation and development of artificial insemination technology in ducks. Induced teaser method and manual massage method of semen collection were evaluated for the ease and reaction time in White Pekin and Khaki Campbell breeds of ducks. Semen characteristics and length of fertile period were examined in both the breeds. Method of semen collection in both the breeds of ducks did not affect semen volume and quality parameters. However, reaction time and hypo-osmotic swollen spermatozoa percent differed significantly with the method of semen collection. The length of fertile period in White Pekin is longer than Khaki Campbell ducks during artificial insemination while it was reverse during natural mating. Our findings indicated that manual message method of semen collection in ducks may be practised for a successful artificial insemination programme as the drakes can be habituated for the semen collection by massage method and donate semen quickly without much difficulty and alteration in semen quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blanco J M, Gee G, Wildt D E and Donoghue A M. 2000. Species variation in osmotic, cryoprotectant, and cooling rate tolerance in poultry, eagle, and peregrine falcon spermatozoa. Biology of Reproduction 63: 1164–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod63.4.1164

Burrows W H and Quinn J P. 1937. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poultry Science 26: 19– 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0160019

Chelmonska B, Dymkowska B and Jerysz A. 1988. Instruction of semen collection from Muscovy drake and duck artificial insemination. Agricultural University, Wroclaw. 1–38 (in Polish).

Chemineau P, Cagnie Y, Gue’rin Y, Orgeur P and Vallet J C. 1991. Training manual on artificial insemination in sheep and goat. FAO, Rome.

Coerrea J R and Zavos P M. 1995. Frozen thawed bovine spermatozoa diluted by slow or rapid dilution method; Measurements on occurrence of osmotic shock and sperm viability. Theriogenology 44: 963–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00283-E

Kamar G A R. 1962. Semen characteristics of various breeds of drakes in the subtropics. Journal of Reproduction Fertility 3: 405–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0030405

Kasai K and Izumo A. 2001. Efficiency of artificial vagina method in semen collection from Osaka drakes. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 10: 206–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/10.3.206

Lukaszewicz E. 2001. Effects of semen filtration and dilution rate on morphology and fertility of frozen gander spermatozoa. Theriogenology 55: 1819–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00524-6

Mcdaniel C D, Hannah J L, Parker H M, Smith T W, Schultz C D and Zumwalt C D. 1998. Use of sperm analyser for evaluating broiler breeder males. Poultry Science 77: 888–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.6.888

Nisshiyama H, Nakashima N and Fukihara N. 1967. Studies on the accessory reproductive organs in the drake and addition to semen of the fluid from the ejaculatory groove region. Poultry Science 55: 234–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0550234

Setioko A R and Hetzel D J. 1984. The effect of collection method and housing system on semen production and fertility of Alabio drakes. British Poultry Science 25:167–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668408454855

Tan N S. 1980. The training of drakes for semen collection. Annals of Zootechnology 93–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:19800201

Downloads

Submitted

2016-10-17

Published

2016-10-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

GIRI, S. C., SASTRY, K. V. H., SAHOO, S. K., & KUMAR, P. (2016). Semen collection, evaluation and fertile period in Khaki Campbell and White Pekin breeds of ducks. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86(10), 1121–1124. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i10.62379
Citation