Applications of artificial neural networks for enhanced livestock productivity: A review
![](/public/icon/gor.png)
![](/public/icon/pdf.png)
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Dairy animals, Estrous detection, Forecasting, Lameness, Mastitis, Milk production, PredictionAbstract
Artificial neural network models are machine-learning systems, a type of artificial intelligence. They have been inspired by and developed along the working principles of the human brain and its nerve cells. It is used in the modelling of non-linear systems. With the information learned through repeated experience, similar to human learning, artificial neural network can provide classification, pattern recognition, optimisation and the realisation of forward-looking forecasts. Artificial neural network has manifold applications in the field of livestock and allied sections for prediction of milk production, prediction of breeding values of bulls, estrous detection, mastitis prediction and lameness detection, detection of cows with artificial insemination difficulties, prediction of success rate of invitro fertilization, manure nutrient content, volatile fatty acids in the rumen of dairy animals. Artificial neural network models were determined to be more successful than cluster analysis. Most of the published works in data analysis use linear models for forecasting the production parameters; however, sufficient literature proved that by using artificial neural network better results obtained as compared to linear or classical methods. The present manuscript is an attempt to review the systematic information available in livestock and allied sector.Downloads
References
Ankinakattea S, Norberga E, Løvendahl P, Edwards D and Højsgaar S. 2013. Predicting mastitis in dairy cows using neural networks and generalized additive models: A comparison. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 99: 1– 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.08.024
Brethour J. 1994. Estimating marbling score in live cattle from ultrasoud images using pattern-recognition and neural-network procedures. Journal of Animal Science 72(6): 1425– 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7261425x
Cavero D, Tölle K H, Henze C, Buxadé C and Krieter J. 2008. Mastitis detection in dairy cows by application of neural networks. Livestock Science 114: 280– 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.05.012
Chandraratne M R, Samarasinghe S, Kulasiri D and Bickerstaffe R. 2006. Prediction of lamb tenderness using image surface texture features. Journal of Food Engineering 77(3): 492– 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.063
Chaturvedi S, Yadav R L, Gupta A K and Sharma A K. 2013. Life time milk amount prediction in dairy cows using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Recent Research and Review 5: 1–6.
Chayjan R A. 2010. Modeling of sesame seed dehydration energy requirements by a soft- computing. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4(3): 180–84.
Chen L J, Cui L Y, Xing L and Han L J. 2008. Prediction of the nutrient content in dairy manure using artificial neural network modeling. Journal of Dairy Science 91(12): 4822–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0978
Craninx M, Fievez V, Vlaeminck B and De Baets B. 2008. Artificial neural network models of the rumen fermentation pattern in dairy cattle. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 60(2): 226–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.08.005
Dong R and Zhao G. 2014. The use of artificial neural network for modeling in vitro rumen methane production using the CNCPS carbohydrate fractions as dietary variables. Livestock Science 162: 159– 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.033
Dongre V B, Gandhi R S, Avtar Singh and Ruhil A P. 2012. Comparative efficiency of artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression analysis for prediction of first lactation 305–day milk yield in Sahiwal cattle. Livestock Science 147: 192–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.04.002
Durairaj M and Meena K. 2008. Application of artificial neural network for predicting fertilization potential of frozen spermatozoa of cattle and buffalo. International Journal of Computer Science and System Analysis, Serials Publications 2(1): 1–10.
Durairaj M and Thamilselvan P. 2013. Applications of artificial neural network for IVF data analysis and prediction. Journal of Engineering Computer and Applied Sciences 2(9): 11–15.
Edriss M A, Hosseinnia P, Edriss M, Rahmani H R and Nilforooshan A. 2008. Prediction of second parity milk performance of dairy cows from first parity information using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression methods. Asian Journal of Animal Veterinary Advances 3: 222– 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2008.222.229
Enquist M and Ghirlanda S. 2008. Neural Networks and Animal Behavior. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
Gandhi R S, Monalisa D, Dongre V B, Ruhil A P, Avtar Singh and Sachdeva G K. 2012. Prediction of first lactation 305-day milk yield based on monthly test day records using artificial neural networks in Sahiwal cattle. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 65(3): 229– 33.
Ghazanfari K N, Nobari K and Tahmoorespur M. 2011. Prediction of egg production using artificial neural network. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 1(1):10–16.
Ghotoorlar S M, Ghamsari S M, Nowrouzian I, Ghotoorlar S M and Ghidary S S. 2012. Lameness scoring system for dairy cows using force plates and artificial intelligence. Veterinary Rececords 170:126– 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.100429
Gorgulu O. 2012. Prediction of 305-day milk yield in Brown Swiss cattle using artificial neural networks. South African Journal of Animal Science 42(3): 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v42i3.10
Goyal S and Goyal G K. 2012. Predicting shelf life of dairy product by using artificial neural networks (ANN) and statistical computerized methods. International Journal of Computer Engineering Research 3(2): 20–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJCER12.008
Grzesiak W, Blaszczyk P and Lacroixb R. 2006. Methods of predicting milk yield in dairy cows-Predictive capabilities of wood’s lactation curve and artificial neural networks (ANNs). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 54: 69–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2006.08.004
Grzesiak W, Zaborski D, Sablik P, ¯ukiewicz A, Dybus A and Szatkowska I. 2010. Detection of cows with insemination problems using selected classification models. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 74(2): 265–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.09.001
Hassan K J. 2007. ‘Application of artificial neural networks for understanding and diagnosing the state of mastitis in dairy cattle.’ M.Sc. Thesis submitted to Lincoln University.
Haykin S. 1999. Neural Networks - A Comprehensive Foundation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Heald C W, Kim T, Sischo W M, Cooper J B and Wolfgang D R. 2000. A computerized mastitis decision aid using farm-based records: An artificial neural network approach. Journal of Dairy Science 83(4): 711–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74933-2
Kamo M, Kubo T and Iwasa Y. 1998. Neural network for female mate preference, trained by a genetic algorithm. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biol 353: 399– 406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0218
Kominakis A P, Abas Z, Maltaris I and Rogdakis E. 2002. A preliminary study of the application of artificial neural networks to prediction of milk yield in dairy sheep. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 35(1): 35–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00051-0
Kunzle Philippe. 2015. Vehicle Control with Neural Networks Game Dev.net. Accessed: April 22, 2015. http://www.gamedev.net/page/index.html
Li J, Tan J and Shatadal P. 2001. Classification of tough and tender beef by image texture analysis. Meat Science 57(4): 341–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00105-4
Li J, Tan J, Martz F A and Heymann H. 1999. Image texture features as indicators of beef tenderness. Meat Science (53)1: 17–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00031-5
Macrossan P E, Hussein A A, Kerry M, Michael T and Gerard F. 1999. Bayesian neural network learning for prediction in the Australian dairy industry. Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1642: 395–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48412-4_33
Mertens K C, Vangeyte J, Weyenberg S V, Campeneere S D and Vannuffe A. 2012. Automatic lameness detection in dairy cows using artificial neural networks. International Conference of Agricultural Engineering. http://cigr.ageng2012.org/images/fotosg/tabla_137_C1140.pdf
Moharrery A and Kargar A. 2007. Artificial Neural Network for prediction of plasma hormones, liver enzymes and performance in broilers. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 16: 293–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/66751/2007
Murphy M D, O’Mahony M J, Shalloo S, French P and Upton J. 2014. Comparison of modelling techniques for milk- production forecasting. Journal of Dairy Science 97(6): 3352– 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7451
Nadimi E S, Jørgensen R N, Blanes-Vidal V and Christensen S. 2012. Monitoring and classifying animal behaviour using ZigBee-based mobile ad hoc wireless sensor networks and artificial neural networks. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 82: 44–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.12.008
National Livestock Policy. 2013. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
Njubi D M, Wakhungu J W and Badamana M S. 2009. Milk yield prediction in Kenyan Holstein-Friesian cattle using computer neural networks system. Livestock Research for Rural Development, Vol. 21; Retrieved June 24, 2014 http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/4/njub21046.htm
Njubi D M, Wakhungu J W and Badamana M S. 2011. Prediction of second parity milk yield of Kenyan Holstein-Friesian dairy cows on first parity information using neural network system and multiple linear regression methods. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23(3): Article# 64; http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/3/njub23064.htm
Noviè, M. 2008. Kohonen and counter-propagation neural networks applied for mapping and interpretation of IR spectra. Artificial Neural Networks : Methods and Applications. pp.45–60. (Ed.) Livingstone D. Humana Press, ISBN: 978–1–58829– 718–1, New York.
Pastell M E and Kujala M. 2007. A probabilistic neural network model for lameness detection. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 2283– 92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-267
Qiao J, Wang N, Ngadi M O, Gunenc A, Monroy M, Gariépy C and Prasher S O. 2007. Prediction of drip-loss, pH, and color for pork using a hyperspectral imaging technique. Meat Science 76(1): 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.031
Qotbi AA A, Nia P H, Seidavi A and Ghovvati S. 2010. Predictions of semen production in ram using phenotypic traits by artificial neural network. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(30): 4822– 25.
Rosenblatt F. 1961. Principles of Neurodynamics: Perceptrons and the Theory of Brain Mechanisms. Spartan Books, Washington D. C., Washington. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0256582
Saleh S, Hassan M Y, Caro L, Ahmad K, Majid K and Kent W. 2012. Prediction of breeding values for dairy cattle using artificial neural networks and Neuro-Fuzzy systems. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine Article ID 127130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/127130
Salle C T P, Guahyba A S, Wald V B, Silva A B, Salle F O and Nascimento V P. 2003. Use of artificial neural networks to estimate production variables of broilers breeders in the production phase. British Poultry Science 44(2): 211–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000088361
Santé V S, Lebert A, Le Pottier G and Ouali A. 1996. Comparison between two statistical models for prediction of turkey breast meat colour. Meat Science 43(3–4): 283– 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00026-5
Sanzogni L and Kerr D. 2011. Milk production estimates using feed forward artificial neural network. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 32: 21–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(01)00151-X
Shan Y, Zhao R, Xua G, Liebich H M and Zhang Y. 2002. Application of probabilistic neural network in the clinical diagnosis of cancers based on clinical chemistry data. Analytica Chimica Acta 471: 77–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00924-8
Sharma A K, Sharma R K and Kasana H S. 2006. Empirical comparisons of feed-forward connectionist and conventional regression models for prediction of first lactation 305-day milk yield in Karan Fries dairy cows. Neural Computer and Application 15: 359–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-006-0037-y
Sheridan C, O’Farrell M, Lewis E, Flanagan C, Kerry J and Jackman N. 2007. A comparison of CIE L and spectral methods for the analysis of fading in sliced cured ham. Journal of Optics A-Pure and Applied Optics 9(6): 32–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/9/6/S06
Shiranita K, Hayashi K, Otsubo A, Miyajima T and Takiyama R. 2000. Grading meat quality by image processing. Pattern Recognition 33 (1): 97–104, ISSN: 0031–3203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00035-7
Silveira C L and Belledeli B D. 2013. Use of artificial neural network for industrial prediction of final temperature of chicken carcasses. Journal of Food Process Engineering 37(1): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12053
Tahmoorespur M and Ahmadi H. 2012. A neural network model to describe weight gain of sheep from genes polymorphism, birth weight and birth type. Livestock Science 148: 221–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.06.008
Wang E and Samarasinghe S. 2005. On-line detection of mastitis in dairy herds using artificial neural networks. International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, December 2005, Pp. 273–278. ISBN: 0–9758400–2–9. http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim05/papers/wang_e.pdf
Zheng C, Sun D W and Zheng L. 2007. Predicting shrinkage of ellipsoid beef joints as affected by water immersion cooking using image analysis and neural network. Journal of Food Engineering 79(4):1243–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.04.010
Zupan J and Gasteiger J. 1991. Neural networks: A new method for solving chemical problems or just a passing phase? Anal Chim Acta 248: 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)80865-X
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.