Phenotypic differentiation among cattle populations based on biometric traits


256 / 127

Authors

  • R K PUNDIR National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • P K SINGH National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i12.65974

Keywords:

Biometric traits, Canonical discriminant analysis, Indigenous cattle

Abstract

An attempt was made to differentiate 3 cattle populations of Rajasthan state i.e. Kankrej (407), Sanchori (152) and Nari (175) by canonical discriminant analysis (CDA), a multivariate technique using 12 different biometric traits. Single trait analysis variance showed that Sanchori cows had largest size, Kankrej was intermediate and Nari was the smallest. The step-wise discriminant analysis showed that distance between hip bones, heart girth, horn length, face width, ear length, face width, horn diameter, height at withers, tail length without switch, tail length and body length were the most discriminating traits between these three cattle populations. The Mahalanobis distances between these cattle populations indicated that they are three distinct populations. The dendrogram based on the average linkage method showed that there are 2 clusters; cluster one includes Nari and Sanchori cows and cluster two Kankrej cows, clearly separated from cluster one. The individual assignment to different cattle populations by the cross-validation classification approach showed that 100% of the Kankrej cows, 98.08% of Sanchori cows and 98.98% of Nari cows were correctly assigned into their source populations. The present study revealed that the free canonical approach is proved useful and informative in differentiating between 3 cattle populations and suggested that Sanchori and Nari may be established/registers as a distinct breed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2016. XV AICRP Cattle Review Meet, held on May 7, 2016 at BAIF, Pune.

Aziz M M A and Al-Hur F S. 2013. Differentiation between three Saudi goat types using size free Canonical discriminant analysis. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 25 (9): 723–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v25i9.15827

Dossa L H, Wollny C and Gauly M. 2007. Spatial variation in goat populations from Benin as revealed by multivariate analysis of morphological traits. Small Ruminant Research 73: 150–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.01.003

Mukeherjee D K, Singh C S P and Mishra H R.1979. A note on some phenotypic parameters in grey and brown Bengal goats. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 49: 671–71.

Neft N A and Marcus L F. 1980. A Survey of Multivariate Methods for Systematic. Privately Published, New York.

Nivsarkar A E, Vij P K and Tantia M S. 2000. Animal Genetic Resources of India Cattle and Buffalo. Pp 155–59. Published by Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Pundir R K, Singh P K, Singh K P and Dangi P S. 2011. Factor analysis of biometric traits of Kankrej cows to explain body. Asian Australian Journal of Animal Sciences 24 (4): 449–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10341

SAS. 2009. Statistical Analysis System User’s guide: Statistic. Cary, NC 27513, U.S.A., SAS Institute Inc.

Yakuba A, Idahor K O, Haruna H S, Wheto M and Amusan S. 2010. Multivariate analysis of phenotypic differenciation in Bunaji and Sokoto Gudali Cattle. Acta Agriculturae Solvenica 96 (2): 75–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10014-010-0018-9

Downloads

Submitted

2016-12-19

Published

2016-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PUNDIR, R. K., & SINGH, P. K. (2016). Phenotypic differentiation among cattle populations based on biometric traits. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86(12), 1415–1419. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i12.65974
Citation