Phenotypic differentiation among cattle populations based on biometric traits
256 / 127
Keywords:
Biometric traits, Canonical discriminant analysis, Indigenous cattleAbstract
An attempt was made to differentiate 3 cattle populations of Rajasthan state i.e. Kankrej (407), Sanchori (152) and Nari (175) by canonical discriminant analysis (CDA), a multivariate technique using 12 different biometric traits. Single trait analysis variance showed that Sanchori cows had largest size, Kankrej was intermediate and Nari was the smallest. The step-wise discriminant analysis showed that distance between hip bones, heart girth, horn length, face width, ear length, face width, horn diameter, height at withers, tail length without switch, tail length and body length were the most discriminating traits between these three cattle populations. The Mahalanobis distances between these cattle populations indicated that they are three distinct populations. The dendrogram based on the average linkage method showed that there are 2 clusters; cluster one includes Nari and Sanchori cows and cluster two Kankrej cows, clearly separated from cluster one. The individual assignment to different cattle populations by the cross-validation classification approach showed that 100% of the Kankrej cows, 98.08% of Sanchori cows and 98.98% of Nari cows were correctly assigned into their source populations. The present study revealed that the free canonical approach is proved useful and informative in differentiating between 3 cattle populations and suggested that Sanchori and Nari may be established/registers as a distinct breed.Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2016. XV AICRP Cattle Review Meet, held on May 7, 2016 at BAIF, Pune.
Aziz M M A and Al-Hur F S. 2013. Differentiation between three Saudi goat types using size free Canonical discriminant analysis. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 25 (9): 723–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v25i9.15827
Dossa L H, Wollny C and Gauly M. 2007. Spatial variation in goat populations from Benin as revealed by multivariate analysis of morphological traits. Small Ruminant Research 73: 150–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.01.003
Mukeherjee D K, Singh C S P and Mishra H R.1979. A note on some phenotypic parameters in grey and brown Bengal goats. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 49: 671–71.
Neft N A and Marcus L F. 1980. A Survey of Multivariate Methods for Systematic. Privately Published, New York.
Nivsarkar A E, Vij P K and Tantia M S. 2000. Animal Genetic Resources of India Cattle and Buffalo. Pp 155–59. Published by Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Pundir R K, Singh P K, Singh K P and Dangi P S. 2011. Factor analysis of biometric traits of Kankrej cows to explain body. Asian Australian Journal of Animal Sciences 24 (4): 449–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10341
SAS. 2009. Statistical Analysis System User’s guide: Statistic. Cary, NC 27513, U.S.A., SAS Institute Inc.
Yakuba A, Idahor K O, Haruna H S, Wheto M and Amusan S. 2010. Multivariate analysis of phenotypic differenciation in Bunaji and Sokoto Gudali Cattle. Acta Agriculturae Solvenica 96 (2): 75–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10014-010-0018-9
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.