Perception of multi-stakeholders towards clean milk production practice at field conditions in Indian dairying


Abstract views: 113 / PDF downloads: 113

Authors

  • PRAKASHKUMAR RATHOD Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension, Veterinary College, Bidar
  • MAHESH CHANDER ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i12.66012

Keywords:

Clean milk production, Multi-stakeholders, Profitability, Relevance, Sustainability

Abstract

Government of India (GoI) efforts in making Clean Milk Production (CMP) as a practice of socio-economic importance, still needs to be emphasized by highlighting the field level realities, and study the perception of multi- stakeholders, viz. dairy farmers, scientists and extensionists towards CMP in Indian dairying. Hence, the present study was designed to know the efforts of GoI for promoting CMP, perception and per cent gap among multi- stakeholders with regards to relevance, profitability and sustainability of CMP in dairying. The study included primary data of 360 dairy farmers, 80 research scientists and 40 extensionists in North India and also relevant secondary data. The study revealed that perception of scientists and extension experts was more favourable towards relevance, profitability and sustainability of CMP, while the perception of farmers was less favourable towards CMP. It was also observed that there was a wide gap between farmers-scientists and farmers-extensionists with respect to relevance, profitability and sustainability, whereas the gap was very narrow among scientists and extensionists. It was concluded from the study that researchers and extension experts must create awareness about the practice of CMP and its advantages for the farmers and the consumers. Further, a need based long-term study under field conditions is very essential with the involvement of farmers so that CMP can be adopted and diffused effectively at field conditions to achieve the target of GoI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aaglave P P and Wadatkar C M. 2012. Microbial examination of milk sample from Nagpur region with reference to coliform. Food Science and Technology Letters 3: 24–26.

Barbuddhe S B and Swain B K. 2008. Hygienic Production of Milk. Technical Bulletin No. 11, ICAR Research Complex for Goa (Indian Council of Agricultural Research), Ela, Old Goa- 403 402, Goa, India.

Chander M, Dutt T, Ravikumar R and Subrahmanyeswari B. 2010. Livestock technology transfer service in India: A review. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80: 1115–25.

Das S. 2003. ‘A multivariate analysis of dairy farming practices among rehabilitated and nomadic Van Gujjars in Haridwar, Uttaranchal.’ Ph.D. Thesis, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal.

FAO. 2008. Milk Hygiene. Milking, Milk Production Hygiene and Udder Health. FAO Animal Production and Health Papers–78, FAO Corporate Document Repository, 1–7 pp.

GoI (Government of India). 2012. Nineteenth Livestock Census, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, India.

GoI (Government of India). 2014. Report of Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries (DAHDF) on Strengthening Infrastructure for Quality & Clean Milk Production. Accessed on 18 June, 2014.

Gray G D, Connell J G and Phimphachanhvongsod V. 2012. Worms in smallholder livestock systems: Technologies and DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.056

practices that make a difference. Veterinary Parasitology 186: 124–31.

Gupta J. 2003. Clean Milk Production. e-book published by NDRI, Karnal, Haryana.

Jacob S K and George A. 2013. Analysis of the clean milk production practices of dairy farmers of Kerala. Indian Journal of Applied Research 3: 604–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/JULY2013/192

Khatkar B S. 2007. Present scenario of quality control of milk in India. Food Science and Technology. Pp- 144 & 153.Daya Books.

Moran J. 2014. The feeding of by-products on small holder dairy farms in Asia and other tropical regions. Final report of FAO E-Conference held in November-December,2013. (Ed.) John Moran. http://www.profitabledairysystems.com.au/publications/

Muhammad K A, Hanif A, Anjum A A and Tipu M Y. 2009. Monitoring of hygienic status of raw milk marketed in Lahore city, Pakistan. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 19:74– 77.

Nanu E, Latha C, Sunil B, Prejit N, Thomas M and Menon K V. 2007. Quality assurance and public health safety of raw milk at the production point. American Journal of Food Technology 2: 145–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2007.145.152

Pandey G S and Voskuil G C J. 2011. Manual on Milk Safety, Quality and Hygiene. Golden Valley Agricultural Research Trust, Zambia.

Patil A P, Gawande S H, Nande M P and Gobade M R. 2009. Assessment of knowledge level of dairy farmers in Nagpur district and the co-relation between socio-economic variables with their training needs. Veterinary World 2: 199–201.

Radder S K and Bhanj S K. 2011. Perceptions of dairy farmers of Gadag district in north-western part of Karnataka state, India regarding Clean Milk Production. Veterinary World 4: 79–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2011.79-81

Rathod P and Chander M. 2014. Identification of socio- economically important dairy innovations in India: A perspective of scientists. In: E. Karamidehkordi (ed), Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Asia and Pacific Islands Rural Advisory Services (APIRAS) and the Fifth Congress of Extension and Education in Agriculture and Natural Resources Management: Facilitating Information and Innovations for Empowering Family Farmers. 2–4 September, 2014,

University of Zanjan, Iran. pp–101. Available at http://www.iaeea.ir/files/site1/Docs_documents/conference_farsi/5th_Congress/total_english_abstract_ book.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2015).

Singh V and Gupta J. 2014. Status of milk quality at farmers’ field. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 84: 1304–08.

Smith O, Avila M and Abdi N. 2004. Strengthening linkages between farmers’ organizations and agricultural research institutions. Proceedings of 36th World Farmers Congress IFAP. pp 1–11. Washington, D. C.

Swaminathan M S. 1991. Toward sustainable agriculture: Dimensions and components. Employment News, 20(34): 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003072709102000406

Thomas B. 2012. An assessment of the role of research and extension services for small-scale crop farmers in North-

Central Namibia. Journal of Agricultural Biodiversity Research 1: 122–26.

Downloads

Submitted

2016-12-19

Published

2016-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RATHOD, P., & CHANDER, M. (2016). Perception of multi-stakeholders towards clean milk production practice at field conditions in Indian dairying. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86(12), 1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i12.66012
Citation