Principal component analysis of biometric traits to explain body conformation in Kajali sheep of Punjab, India
459 / 137
Keywords:
Kajali sheep, Morphometry, Multivariate analysis, PCAAbstract
Different body biometric traits were analysed in Kajali ewes (395) of Punjab (India) using varimax rotated principal components (PCA) with Kaiser Normalization to explain their body conformation and were subsequently used to predict adult body weight. These traits revealed that Kajali sheep were large in size and suitable for mutton production. The positive and highly significant phenotypic correlations among most of the traits indicates high predictability among these traits. PCA extracted major three components which explained 68.66% of total variation of body biometry. First component described the body size and explained about 36% of total variation. It was represented by high component loadings for chest girth, paunch girth and body weight. The second component described the tail length, height and ear length and explained about 21% variation. The communalities ranges between 0.33 (face length) to 0.87 (chest girth). The lower communality of face length and ear length indicates that these traits are less effective to explain the body conformation. The study suggested that PCA could be used in breeding programme for phenotypic selection of Kajali ewes and PCA is more appropriate compared to multiple regression analysis in predicting adult body weight. In predicting body weight using multiple regression analysis, chest girth alone accounted for 55% of total variation in body weight whereas, use of first principal component as a single predictor explained 79% of total variance and the best prediction equation (R2 = 0.83) was obtained after inclusion of second and third component in the model.Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2015. Annual Report. ICAR- National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources, Karnal, India. Pp: 17–18.
Brooks S, Makvandi- Nejad S, Chu E, Allen J, Streeter C, Gu E, McCleery B, Bellome R and Sutter N. 2010. Morphological variation in the horse: defining complex traits of body size and shape. Animal Genetics 41: 159–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02127.x
Brown C J, Brown J E and Butts W T. 1973. Evaluating relationships among immature measures of size, shapes and performance of beef bulls II, The relationships between immature measures od size, shape and feedlot traits in young beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 36: 1021–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1973.3661021x
Fernandez G. 2002. Data mining using SAS application. Chapman & Hall/CRC press, USA. Pp. 367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420057331
Harvey W R. 1987. Least-squares analysis of data with unequal sub-class numbers. ARS H-4. USDA, Washington DC, USA. Johnson R A and Wichern D W. 1982. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis: Prentice-Hall, Inc; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
Kaiser H F. 1958. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23: 187–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
Kaiser H F. 1974. Index to factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39: 31–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Keskin S, dasiran I and Kor A. 2007. Factor analysis scores in a multiple linear regression model for prediction of carcass weight in Akkeci kids. Journal of Applied Animal Research 31: 210–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2007.9706664
Kunene N W, Bezuidenhout C C and Nsahlaii V. 2009. Determination of prediction equations for estimating body weight of Zulu (Nauni) sheep. Small Ruminant Research 84: 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.05.003
Legaz E, Cervantes I, Perez- Cabel M A, de la Fuente L F, Martenez R, Gpyache F and Gutiferrez J P. 2011. Multivariate characterization of morphological traits in Assaf (Assaf. E) sheep. Small Ruminant Research 100: 122–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.06.005
Mavule B S, Muchenje V, Bezuidenhout and Kunene N W. 2013. Morphological structure of Zulu sheep based on principal component analysis of body measurements. Small Ruminant Research 111: 23–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.09.008
Mishra A K, Arora A L, Kumar S, Sharma R C and Singh V K. 2005. Malpura: A mutton type sheep breed. Bulletin, ICAR- Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar, Rajasthan.
Ogah D M. 2011. Assessing size and conformation of the body of Nigerian indigenous Turkey. Slovak Journal of Animal Science44: 21–27.
Okpeku M, Yakubu A, Peters S O, Ozoje M O, Ikeobi C O N, Adebambo O A and Imunmorin I G. 2011. Application of multivariate principal component analysis to morphological traits of goats in southern Nigeria. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 98: 101–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10014-011-0026-4
Pundir R K, Singh P K, Singh K P and Dangi P S. 2011. Factor analysis of biometric traits of Kankrej cows to explain body conformation. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 24: 449–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10341
Sadak M H, Al-Aboud A Z and Ashmaway A A. 2006. Factor analysis of body measurements in Arabian horses. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 123: 369–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00618.x
Salako A E. 2006. Principal component factor analysis of the morpho structure of immature Uda sheep. International Journal of Morphology 24: 571–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022006000500009
SPSS. 2001. Statistical Package for social sciences. SPSS Inc, 444 Michigan Avenue, Chicago, II, USA.
Tolenkhomba T C, Singh N S and Konsam D S. 2013. Princiapl component analysis of body measurements of bull of local cattle of Manipur, India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 281–84.
Vohra V, Niranjan S K, Mishra A K, Jamuna V, Chopra A, Sharma N and Jeong D K. 2015. Phenotypic characterization and multivariate analysis to explain body conformation in lesser known buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) from north India. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 28: 311– 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0451
Yadav D K, Arora R, Bhatia S and Singh G. 2011. Morphological characterization, production and reproduction status of Munjal – A threatened sheep population of North–West India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 81: 943–45.
Yakubu A and Ayoade J. 2009. Application of principal component factor analysis in quantifying size and morphological indices of domestic rabbits. International Journal of Morphology 27: 1013–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022009000400009
Yunusa A J, Salako A E and Oladejo O A. 2013. Principal component analysis of the morphostructure of Uda and Balami sheep of Nigeria. International Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1: 45–51.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.