Genetic evaluation of lifetime performance of Phule Triveni cows by univariate and multivariate methods


301 / 148

Authors

  • G S AMBHORE ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • AVTAR SINGH ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • D K DEOKAR ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • MANVENDRA SINGH ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • S K SAHOO ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • P DIVYA ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i2.67709

Keywords:

Genetic and non-genetic factors, Lifetime traits, Phule Triveni cow, Univariate and multivariate evaluation

Abstract

Data pertaining to 509 Phule Triveni cows sired by 102 bulls maintained at Research-Cum Development Project
on Cattle, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri District Ahmadnagar (Maharashtra) were analysed to study
the performance of Phule Triveni cows for lifetime traits. Least-squares means and genetic parameters were estimated for different lifetime traits. The observed least squares means for actual life time milk yield (ALTMY), herd life (HL), productive life (PL) and breeding efficiency (BE) were 12767 ± 207 kg, 2863 ± 29 days, 1875 ± 28 days and
77.00 ± 0.71%, respectively. The estimates of heritability (h2) for all these lifetime traits under univariate methods
(LSML and REML) were 0.15 ± 0.11 and 0.22 ± 0.08 for ALTMY, 0.10 ± 0.12 and 0.19 ± 0.06 for HL, 0.10 ± 0.11 and 0.16 ± 0.05 for PL and 0.01 ± 0.11 and 0.10 ± 0.07 for BE, respectively. The h2 estimates obtained by REML method were higher as compared to LSML. The h2 estimates for ALTMY under two traits models were 0.27 ± 0.08, 0.20 ± 0.08 and 0.20 ± 0.06 for ALTMY + PL, ALTMY + HL and ALTMY + BE traits combinations, respectively. The observed estimates of h2 for ALTMY in combination with PL were higher than the estimates obtained under univariate model by REML method. The estimates of h2 for ALTMY were 0.54 ± 0.03, 0.54 ± 0.06 and 0.49 ± 0.02 for ALTMY + PL + HL, ALTMY + PL + BE and ALTMY + HL + BE traits combinations, respectively. The h2 estimates of ALTMY under three trait models were quite high, positive and significant compared to two trait and unitrait models by REML method. The lifetime trait combinations of ALTMY, HL, PL and BE could be used for genetic evaluation and selection of cows in the herd at any point of time. The genetic and phenotypic correlations among the lifetime traits in the present study were 0.90 ± 0.10 and 0.92 ± 0.11, 0.88 ± 0.17 and 0.98 ± 0.11 and 0.17 ± 0.08 and 0.06 ± 0.26 within ALTMY and PL, ALTMY and HL and ALTMY and BE, respectively. The high genetic and phenotypic correlations between ALTMY, HL and PL revealed that selection can be based on any one of these lifetime traits to bring improvement in other lifetime traits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chaudhary M Z and Shafiq M. 1995. Lifetime production performance of Holstein Friesian × Sahiwal crossbreds. Asian Australasian Journal Animal Science 8(5): 499–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1995.499

Dalal D S, Rathi S S and Raheja K L. 2002. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for first lactation and lifetime performance traits in Haryana cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 72(5): 398–401.

Dash S. 2014. ‘Genetic evaluation of Karan Fries cattle for fertility and production traits’. Ph.D. Thesis, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal. India.

Deshmukh P V. 2008. ‘Longevity and lifetime performance of Phule Triveni crossbred cattle’. M.Sc. (Agri.), Thesis, MPKV, Rahuri.

Hammound M H and Salem M M I. 2013. The genetic evaluation of some first lactation traits of Holstein cows in Egypt. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research 58(1): 1–8.

Harvey W R. 1990. Guide for LSMLMW, PC-1 Version, mixed model least squares and maximum likelihood computer programme. Mimeograph Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

Joshi R S. 2009. ‘Longevity and lifetime performance of Holstein Friesian × Gir halfbreds at Panjarpole Ahmednagar’. M.Sc. (Agri.), Thesis, M.P.K.V., Rahuri.

Kaushik S N, Agrawal S S and Garg R C. 1994. Lifetime in Haryana cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 64: 1104– 07.

Kohle P R. 2011. ‘Factors affecting reproductive performance of Phule Triveni synthetic cows’. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, M.P.K.V., Rahuri.

Kramer C Y. 1957. Extension of multiple range test to group corrected adjusted means. Biometrics 13:13–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001898

Meyer K. 2007. WOMBAT- A tool for mixed model analysis in quantitative genetics by REML. Journal of Zheijang University Science 8: 815–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815

Shinde A S. 2010. ‘Studies on breeding efficiency of HF crossbreds’. M.Sc. (Agri.), Thesis, M.P.K.V., Rahuri.

Shinde S B. 2002. ‘Studies on life time production traits of Phule Triveni (Triple crossbred) cattle’. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, M.P.K.V., Rahuri.

Singh M K, Sharma R C and Gupta A K. 1995. Association among lifetime traits in Karan Swiss cattle. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 48: 538–39.

Singh V K, Singh C V, Kumar D and Kumar A. 2002. Genetic evaluation of some economic traits in Sahiwal and its crossbreds. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 58(3): 206–10.

Willcox C J, Pfau K O and Bartlett J W. 1957. An investigation of the inheritance of female reproductive performance and longevity and their inter-relationship within a Holstein Friesian herd. Journal of Dairy Science 40: 924–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(57)94578-2

Zol S R, Bhoite U Y, Pachpute S T and Deokar D K. 2009. Reproduction and production performance and breeding efficiency of Phule Triveni crossbred cows. Journal of Maharashtra Agriculture Universities 34(2): 208–10.

Downloads

Submitted

2017-02-15

Published

2017-02-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

AMBHORE, G. S., SINGH, A., DEOKAR, D. K., SINGH, M., SAHOO, S. K., & DIVYA, P. (2017). Genetic evaluation of lifetime performance of Phule Triveni cows by univariate and multivariate methods. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(2), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i2.67709
Citation