Effect of strain and sex of bird on carcass and fat yield of foraging slow-growing chickens
188 / 71
Keywords:
Abdominal fat, Carcass, Chickens, Sex, Strain, WeightAbstract
Meat and fat yield influence the profitability of modern commercial poultry production. This study sought to determine the effect of strain and sex on carcass and fat yield of three slow-growing chicken strains reared in open and closed pens. Two hundred and fifty-eight, 20-week old PK, OV and NN chickens, weighing 1710±308.8 g, were allocated to 4 paddocks of Chloris gayana and 4 pens in a poultry house. Final body weight (BW), carcass (CW), dressed (DW) weight, cut, abdominal fat pad (AFP) yield and giblet weights were determined. As a result of this study, strain did not affect BW but influenced back, pancreas, gizzard, neck, crop and AFP weight. Sex of bird influenced BW and males were significantly heavier, yielding heavier cuts and pancreases but lighter AFP than females. It was concluded that foraging males yield heavier cuts and females are fattier than foraging males of the same strain. Evaluating fatty acid composition of meat from foraging birds could help quantify risk associated with consumption of meat from foraging slow-growing chickens.
Downloads
References
Chikumba N and Chimonyo M. 2014. Effects of water restriction on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and organ weights of Naked Neck and Ovambo chickens of Southern Africa. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27: 974–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13383
Chabault M, Baéza E, Gigaud V, Chartrin P, Chapuis H, Boulay M, Arnould C, D’Abbadie F, Berri C and Le Bihan-Duval E. 2012. Analysis of a slow-growing line reveals wide genetic variability of carcass and meat quality-related traits. BMC Genetics DOI: 10.1186/1471–2156–13–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-13-90
Eits R M, Kwakkel R P, Verstegen M W A and Emmans G C. 2003. Responses of broiler chickens to dietary protein: Effects of early life protein nutrition on later responses. British Poultry Science 44: 398–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000035544
Fanatico A C, Pillai P B, Cavitt L C, Owens C M and Emmert J L. 2005. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Growth performance and carcass yield. Poultry Science 84:1321–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1321
Faria P B, Bressan M C, de Souza X R, Rossato L V, Botega L M G and da Gama L T. 2010. Carcass and parts yield of broilers reared under a semi-extensive system. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 12: 153–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2010000300003
Fouad A M and El-Senousey H K. 2014. Nutritional factors affecting abdominal fat deposition in poultry: A Review. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27: 1057–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13702
Grobbelaar J A N, Sutherland B and Molalakgotla N M. 2010. Egg production potentials of certain indigenous chicken breeds from South Africa. Animal Genetic Resources 46: 25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633610000664
Haslinger M, Leitgeb R, Bauer F, Ettle T and Windisch W M. 2007. Slaughter yield and meat quality of chicken at different length of preslaughter feed withdrawal. Die Bodenkultur 67: 1–4.
Hrnèár C, Weis J, Pál G, Baraòska B, Bujko J and Hanusová E. 2010. Meat performance of the hen’s breed Oravka after reproductive and laying period. Scientific Papers: Animal Science and Biotechnologies 43: 284–86.
Janczak A M and Riber A B. 2015. Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science 94: 1454–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev123
Loh T C, Tan B F, Foo H L, Ab1ullah N, Idrus Z and Ramlah H. 2000. Manipulation of very low density lipoprotein metabolism to reduce fat deposition in poultry. UPM Research Report 1997–2000, Vol II, Section 2-Extended Abstracts.
Mapiye C, Mwale M, Mupangwa J F, Chimonyo M, Foti R and Mutenje M J. 2008. A research review of village chicken production constraints and opportunities in Zimbabwe. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 21: 1680–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.r.07
Midmore P, Naspetti S, Sherwood A M, Daniela V, Wier M and Zanoli R. 2005. Consumer attitudes to quality and safety of organic and low input foods: A review. Quality low input food. Accessed June 2015. http://r0.unctad.org/trade_env/itf-organic/meetings/miscQLIF_Review_Reanalysis200509.pdf.
Mignon-Grasteau S, Beaumont C, Poivey J P and de Rochambeau H. 1998. Estimation of the genetic parameters of sexual dimorphism of body weight in ‘label’ chickens and Muscovy ducks. Genetics Selection Evolution 30: 481–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-30-5-481
Misztal L and Lovendahl P. 2012. Genotype by environment interactions in commercial populations. Environmental Physiology of Livestock. Pages 289–90. (Eds) Collier R J and Collier J L. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119949091.ch16
Peng Y D, Xu H Y, Ye F, Lan X, Peng X, Rustempašiæ A, Yin H D, Zhao X L, Liu Y P, Zhu Q and Wang Y. 2010. Effects of sex and age on chicken TBC1D1 gene mRNA expression. Genetics and Molecular Research 14: 7704–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.July.13.16
Ponte P I P, Rosado C M C, Crespo J P, Crespo D G, Mourão J L, Chaveiro-Soares M A, Brás J L A, Mendes I, Gama L T, Prates J A M, Ferreira L M A and Fontes C M G A. 2008. Pasture intake improves the performance and meat sensory attributes of free-range broilers. Poultry Science 87: 71–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00147
Remes¡ V and Sze´kely T. 2010. Domestic chickens defy Rensch’s rule: Sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 2754–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02126.x
Sales J. 2014. Effects of access to pasture on performance, carcass composition, and meat quality in broilers: a meta-analysis. Poultry Science 93: 1523–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03499
Sanz M, Lopez-Bote C J, Menoyo D and Bautista J M. 2000. Abdominal fat deposition and fatty acid synthesis are lower and b-oxidation is higher in broiler chickens fed diets containing unsaturated rather than saturated fat. American Society for Nutritional Sciences 11: 3034–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.12.3034
Statistical Analysis System. 2010. SAS/STAT User’s guide, Release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Takahashi S E, Mendes A A, Saldanha E S P B, Pizzolante C C, Pelícia K, Garcia R G, Paz I C L A and Quinteiro R R. 2006. Efeito do sistema de criação sobre o desempenho e rendimento de carcaça de frangos de corte tipo colonial. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 58: 624–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000400026
Wood J D, Enser M, Fisher A V and Nute G R. 2008. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: a review. Meat Science 78: 343–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019
Zhao X, Ren W, Siegel P B, Li J, Yin H, Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Honaker C F and Zhu Q. 2015. Housing systems interacting with sex and genetic line affect broiler growth and carcass traits. Poultry Science 94: 1711–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev128
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.